ECG Library
The ECG patterns every emergency physician should recognize on sight — each a complete teaching card with the findings, pearls, pitfalls, and the bedside action that recognition triggers. One rotates onto the front page every day.
Ischemia & Infarction (17)
Anterior STEMI Anterior ST elevation means LAD occlusion until proven otherwise, and proximal lesions carry high risk for shock and malignant dysrhythms.
A 57-year-old woman presents with crushing chest pressure and diaphoresis. The ECG shows ST elevation in V2 through V5 with reciprocal ST depression in III and aVF. V1 has slight elevation and aVL is involved. The QRS complexes are still narrow and there are no established Q waves.
Key ECG findings
- ST elevation in anterior precordial leads V1βV4, often extending to V5βV6 depending on LAD territory
- Reciprocal inferior ST depression may be present
- Proximal LAD occlusion may involve V1, aVL, or produce widespread anterior changes
- Hyperacute T waves may precede obvious ST elevation
- New Q waves, poor R-wave progression, or terminal QRS distortion suggest more advanced infarction
Pearls
- Hyperacute anterior T waves can be the first STEMI finding. Do not wait for dramatic STE when the story and regional T waves fit.
- Anterior STEMI has a large myocardium-at-risk footprint; shock and ventricular dysrhythmias are the feared complications.
- Compare with old ECGs when LVH or early repolarization is possible, but do not let comparison delay activation in a convincing case.
Pitfalls
- Benign early repolarization and LVH can mimic anterior STE. Reciprocal changes, terminal QRS distortion, symptoms, and serial evolution help separate them.
- Do not dismiss anterior STE in young patients as early repol without a deliberate check for ischemic morphology.
- Posterior MI produces anterior ST depression, not anterior STE; do not mix the mirror-image pattern.
At the Bedside
Activate STEMI pathway, give antiplatelet/anticoagulation per local protocol, manage dysrhythmia/shock risk, and get emergent cardiology involvement.
LITFL ECG Library β Anterior Myocardial Infarction · reviewed 2026-06-12
Aslanger Pattern / OMI Aslanger pattern is a subtle occlusion-MI clue: isolated inferior lead III elevation with widespread subendocardial ischemia signs.
A 66-year-old diabetic patient presents with diaphoresis and vague chest discomfort. The ECG shows ST elevation only in lead III, ST depression in multiple lateral and precordial leads, and ST elevation in aVR. Lead III looks abnormal but II and aVF do not meet classic inferior STEMI criteria.
Key ECG findings
- Isolated ST elevation in lead III without equivalent elevation in II and aVF
- ST depression in multiple leads, especially I, aVL, and V4βV6
- ST elevation in aVR may be present
- Pattern suggests inferior OMI with concomitant diffuse subendocardial ischemia, often multivessel disease
- May fail classic STEMI criteria
Pearls
- The danger is not the amount of ST elevation; it is the pattern combination.
- Aslanger pattern is one of the reasons OMI thinking matters more than strict STEMI millimeters.
- Lead III deserves respect when it is the only inferior lead elevating in a sick ACS patient with diffuse depression elsewhere.
Pitfalls
- Do not dismiss isolated lead III elevation as noise without checking the rest of the ECG.
- Do not wait for the pattern to become a textbook inferior STEMI if the patient is unstable or high-risk.
- Do not confuse this with diffuse demand ischemia alone; the focal lead III elevation is the clue to an occlusion component.
At the Bedside
Treat as high-risk ACS/possible OMI. Repeat ECGs, compare old tracings, give ACS therapy per protocol, and involve cardiology early for possible emergent angiography.
LITFL ECG Library β Aslanger Pattern · reviewed 2026-06-12
Inferior STEMI Inferior ST elevation is usually RCA or LCx occlusion; always look for RV involvement and posterior extension.
A 59-year-old man presents with diaphoresis and epigastric pressure. The ECG shows ST elevation in II, III, and aVF with reciprocal ST depression in I and aVL. ST elevation is greater in III than II, and V1 has slight ST elevation. He becomes hypotensive after nitroglycerin given before arrival, prompting right-sided leads.
Key ECG findings
- ST elevation in II, III, and aVF
- Reciprocal ST depression in I and aVL supports acute inferior infarction
- STE in lead III greater than lead II suggests RCA occlusion; STE in II greater than III suggests LCx more often
- Look for posterior involvement with ST depression in V1βV3
- Look for right ventricular infarction with V4R ST elevation, especially when hypotensive
Pearls
- Inferior STEMI is a territory plus a complication screen: RV infarct, posterior infarct, bradyarrhythmias, and AV block.
- Lead aVL reciprocal depression is a powerful subtle clue when inferior STE is small.
- Right-sided leads are fast and high-yield when inferior STEMI patients are hypotensive or have clear RCA clues.
Pitfalls
- Nitrates can crash a preload-dependent RV infarct patient. Use caution when inferior STEMI plus hypotension or V4R elevation is present.
- Inferior MI can present as nausea, weakness, syncope, or epigastric pain rather than classic chest pain.
- Do not ignore bradycardia or AV block in inferior STEMI; nodal ischemia may evolve quickly.
At the Bedside
Activate STEMI pathway, give antiplatelet/anticoagulation per local protocol, obtain right-sided/posterior leads when indicated, avoid nitrates if RV infarct or hypotension is suspected, and involve cardiology immediately.
LITFL ECG Library β Inferior STEMI · reviewed 2026-05-11
Lateral STEMI ST elevation in I, aVL and V5-6 is a stand-alone indication for emergent reperfusion, and isolated inferior ST depression may be its only easily visible clue.
A 62-year-old man with hypertension arrives with an hour of left-sided chest heaviness radiating to the jaw. He is diaphoretic; blood pressure 148/90, heart rate 92. The monitor tech hands you the 12-lead and points to the inferior leads, where there is ST depression in III and aVF that first catches your eye. Scanning up to the high lateral leads, you see subtle ST elevation in I and aVL, and following across the precordium there is a hint of ST elevation with fattened, hyperacute T waves in V5 and V6. R wave progression is preserved and there are no Q waves yet. The prior ECG on file, from a clinic visit two years ago, is clean.
Key ECG findings
- ST elevation in the lateral leads: I, aVL, V5-6
- Reciprocal ST depression in the inferior leads (III and aVF), seen when there is ST elevation in I and aVL
- ST elevation localized to I and aVL defines a high lateral STEMI
- Hyperacute T waves in V5-6 may accompany subtle lateral ST elevation
- ST elevation in the precordial leads plus the high lateral leads (I and aVL) predicts a proximal LAD lesion 87% of the time
Pearls
- Isolated inferior ST depression should make you scrutinize I and aVL for high lateral ST elevation β the reciprocal change is often more obvious than the primary injury current.
- Lateral extension of an anterior, inferior or posterior MI marks a larger territory at risk and a worse prognosis, so hunting for lateral involvement changes how sick you consider the patient.
- The lateral wall is fed by branches of both the LAD and the circumflex, so the culprit is often a smaller branch β D1, obtuse marginal, or ramus intermedius β that a quick read can dismiss as 'nonspecific.'
Pitfalls
- Reciprocal inferior ST depression can be obliterated when there is concomitant inferior ST elevation (inferolateral STEMI), removing your best clue to the lateral injury.
- Subtle high lateral ST elevation in I and aVL is easily missed; the inferior reciprocal depression is what makes it visible.
- A completed high lateral MI can present with only a pathological Q wave in aVL and T-wave inversion in I and aVL β do not mistake this for an old, benign tracing.
At the Bedside
Treat lateral ST elevation as a STEMI: activate the cath lab for emergent reperfusion and give ACS therapy per your local pathway. Do not wait for anterior or inferior changes to declare it.
LITFL ECG Library β Lateral STEMI · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Main Coronary Artery Occlusion / ST Elevation in aVR Diffuse ST depression with ST elevation in aVR is global subendocardial ischemia until proven otherwise.
A 72-year-old man presents diaphoretic and hypotensive with chest pressure. The ECG does not meet classic STEMI criteria. Instead, it shows widespread horizontal ST depression in I, II, aVL, and V3 through V6 with 1.5 mm of ST elevation in aVR. He looks much sicker than the computer interpretation suggests.
Key ECG findings
- Diffuse ST depression across multiple territories, often maximal in lateral precordial leads
- ST elevation in aVR, sometimes also V1
- Pattern suggests global subendocardial ischemia from left main, proximal LAD, severe triple-vessel disease, or supply-demand mismatch
- Clinical instability, ongoing chest pain, or dynamic change increases concern for acute coronary occlusion or critical stenosis
- May not meet classic STEMI criteria despite high-risk coronary anatomy
Pearls
- aVR is not a trash lead. In the right pattern, it is the lead that tells you the whole heart is ischemic.
- This pattern is not automatically left main occlusion, but it is automatically high-risk when paired with ACS symptoms or shock.
- The differential includes severe anemia, hypoxia, hypotension, and tachydysrhythmia; treat supply-demand causes while involving cardiology.
Pitfalls
- Do not call it NSTEMI-low-risk just because there is no regional ST elevation.
- Do not overcall isolated aVR elevation without diffuse reciprocal depression and a fitting clinical picture.
- Left main/prox LAD/triple-vessel physiology can deteriorate quickly; serial troponins alone are not the plan.
At the Bedside
Treat as high-risk ACS/global ischemia: resuscitate, correct supply-demand triggers, give ACS therapy per protocol, and obtain urgent cardiology consultation for possible emergent angiography.
LITFL ECG Library β ST Elevation in aVR / Left Main Coronary Artery Occlusion · reviewed 2026-05-11
Occlusion MI (OMI) vs STEMI STEMI criteria miss up to 30% of acute coronary occlusions; learn the non-ST-elevation patterns that still mean the cath lab.
A 52-year-old man with ischemic-sounding chest pain hands you his ECG. In the inferior leads there is ST elevation, but only a millimeter or so β not enough to satisfy your STEMI threshold. You are about to call it nonspecific when you notice lead aVL: a small but definite scoop of ST depression, the only lead truly reciprocal to the inferior wall. Nothing else jumps out. The rhythm is sinus, the QRS is narrow, and there are no established Q waves. The first troponin is pending and the man is still holding his chest. The overnight resident wants to admit him to the floor as an NSTEMI and wait for serial troponins.
Key ECG findings
- Inferior ST elevation of any degree with any reciprocal ST depression in aVL β highly suspicious for inferior OMI (aVL is the only lead truly reciprocal to the inferior wall)
- New RBBB with left anterior fascicular block β strongly associated with proximal LAD occlusion; look for subtle concordant STE (e.g. in V2)
- Hyperacute T waves: T waves out of proportion to the preceding R wave, wider and more symmetric than normal, often preceding classic ST elevation
- ST depression maximal in V1-4 without spread to V5-6 β posterior OMI until proven otherwise, even without ST elevation in V7-9
- Diffuse ST depression with ST elevation in aVR β left main or triple-vessel disease (a NOMI pattern warranting urgent, not emergent, catheterization)
Pearls
- The problem was never missing MI β it is missing the acute occlusion that reperfusion would fix. Up to 30% of patients labeled NSTEMI have a totally occluded artery found on delayed cath, by which time the tissue is already infarcted.
- In low-voltage QRS complexes, judge the ST and T changes in proportion to the preceding complex rather than by absolute millimeters β small deflections can be occlusion.
- A prior ECG is your friend: a RBBB or fascicular block that was not there two months ago transforms a subtle tracing into an emergency.
Pitfalls
- Anchoring on the STEMI millimeter threshold: dismissing 1 mm of inferior STE with reciprocal aVL depression as 'nonspecific' delays a patient who needs immediate PCI.
- Waiting for troponin to declare an occlusion β the diagnosis is electrocardiographic and clinical; a normal early troponin does not exclude OMI.
- Confusing diffuse subendocardial ischemia (ST depression deepest in V4-6 and II, often demand-related) with true posterior OMI (ST depression maximal in V1-4) β the lead distribution separates them.
At the Bedside
Treat OMI patterns as STEMI-equivalents: activate cardiology for consideration of immediate PCI rather than admitting for serial troponins. Any patient with ongoing ischemic chest pain warrants urgent angiography regardless of whether strict ST-elevation criteria are met.
LITFL ECG Library β OMI: Replacing the STEMI misnomer · reviewed 2026-07-06
Posterior STEMI ST depression in V1βV3 with tall R waves and upright T waves is the mirror image of posterior wall infarction β flip the ECG and you are looking at a STEMI.
A 62-year-old woman with diaphoresis and back pain has an ECG that shows ST depression of 2 mm in V1 through V3 with notably tall R waves in V1βV2 and upright T waves in those leads. Inferior leads show subtle ST elevation of about 1 mm in II, III, and aVF. The triage interpretation reads 'anterior ischemia' and no STEMI alert is called. Posterior leads V7βV9, placed at the request of the senior physician, show 1.5 mm of ST elevation. The cath lab is activated.
Key ECG findings
- Horizontal ST depression in V1βV3 (sometimes extending to V4) β the mirror image of ST elevation
- Tall R waves in V1βV2 (R/S ratio > 1, R wave width often > 40 ms)
- Upright T waves in V1βV2
- Often accompanied by inferior STEMI findings (ST elevation in II, III, aVF) because the same RCA territory is involved
- Confirm by placing posterior leads V7βV9: β₯ 0.5 mm ST elevation is diagnostic
Pearls
- When you see anterior ST depression, ask whether the ECG is upside down. Flip the tracing mentally β depression becomes elevation, R waves become Q waves, and the diagnosis becomes obvious.
- Posterior MI is most often part of an inferior or lateral infarct. If the inferior leads are abnormal, look harder at V1βV3.
- Posterior leads add only 30 seconds at the bedside. Use them whenever V1βV3 show ST depression that you can't otherwise explain.
Pitfalls
- The standard 12-lead ECG does not directly view the posterior wall, so the diagnosis is easy to miss without active suspicion.
- Computer interpretation rarely calls posterior MI; many algorithms label it 'anterior subendocardial ischemia' instead.
- An isolated posterior MI (no inferior or lateral involvement) is rarer but happens. Keep V7βV9 on the table when the story fits.
At the Bedside
Treat as STEMI. ASA and anticoagulation per local pathway, cath lab activation, posterior leads to confirm and document. Do not delay activation while obtaining V7βV9 if suspicion is high β the workflow runs in parallel.
LITFL ECG Library β Posterior Myocardial Infarction · reviewed 2026-05-06
Right Ventricular STEMI RV infarction makes the patient preload-dependent; V4R ST elevation changes your nitrate and fluid decisions.
A 64-year-old man with inferior STEMI becomes hypotensive after a small dose of nitroglycerin. His lungs are clear and JVP is elevated. Right-sided ECG leads show ST elevation in V4R. The cath lab is already being activated, but the resuscitation plan changes immediately.
Key ECG findings
- Usually occurs with inferior STEMI, especially proximal RCA occlusion
- ST elevation in V4R is the most useful right-sided lead finding
- May show ST elevation in V1 with inferior STEMI
- Clinical triad can include hypotension, clear lungs, and elevated JVP
- May be associated with bradycardia or high-grade AV block
Pearls
- Any hypotensive inferior STEMI deserves right-sided leads.
- RV infarct patients may need cautious fluids to maintain preload while awaiting reperfusion.
- Clear lungs in a hypotensive STEMI patient are a clue that the shock may be RV/preload physiology rather than left-sided pulmonary edema.
Pitfalls
- Do not give nitrates reflexively to inferior STEMI with hypotension or suspected RV involvement.
- Absence of classic JVP findings does not exclude RV infarct in a chaotic ED exam.
- RV infarct and PE can both create right-sided strain; the inferior STEMI pattern points you to the culprit.
At the Bedside
Activate STEMI pathway, avoid nitrates if RV infarct suspected, give cautious IV fluids if hypotensive without pulmonary edema, treat bradyarrhythmias, and expedite reperfusion.
LITFL ECG Library β Right Ventricular Infarction · reviewed 2026-05-11
Sgarbossa Criteria A scoring system for diagnosing acute MI in the setting of left bundle branch block or ventricular paced rhythm β the modified version is the more sensitive bedside tool.
A 71-year-old man with a known left bundle branch block presents with chest pain. The old rule of 'new LBBB equals STEMI' has been retired, but ischemia in LBBB still has to be diagnosed somehow. On his ECG, lead III shows 2 mm of ST elevation in the same direction as a positive QRS β concordant ST elevation.
Key ECG findings
- Original criterion 1 (5 points): concordant ST elevation β₯ 1 mm in a lead with a predominantly positive QRS
- Original criterion 2 (3 points): concordant ST depression β₯ 1 mm in V1βV3
- Original criterion 3 (2 points): discordant ST elevation β₯ 5 mm in a lead with predominantly negative QRS
- A score of β₯ 3 has high specificity (> 90%) for acute MI but limited sensitivity
- Modified (Smith) Sgarbossa replaces criterion 3 with proportional discordance: ST elevation β₯ 25% of the preceding S-wave depth β substantially more sensitive without sacrificing specificity
Pearls
- In LBBB or a paced rhythm, the entire ECG already shows discordant ST changes at baseline. Sgarbossa identifies the changes that exceed what conduction delay alone would produce.
- Concordance is the strongest signal. A single concordant ST elevation in any lead (criterion 1) is almost as specific as the full score.
- Modified Sgarbossa is the better tool when the patient has a deep S wave and any ST elevation that would otherwise look proportionate. Use the 25% rule rather than the absolute 5 mm threshold.
Pitfalls
- The old teaching of 'new LBBB equals STEMI' over-activates the cath lab. Sgarbossa is the more accurate framework β apply it.
- The criteria are not very sensitive overall; a negative score does not exclude infarction. Pair the ECG with serial troponin and clinical context.
- Right ventricular pacing produces an LBBB-like pattern, so Sgarbossa applies to paced rhythms too. Ask about the device interrogation if available.
At the Bedside
Apply modified Sgarbossa to any LBBB or ventricular paced rhythm with concerning chest pain. A positive score warrants STEMI activation. A negative score does not rule out MI β admit, serial troponin, and serial ECGs as the symptoms and risk profile dictate.
LITFL ECG Library β Sgarbossa Criteria · reviewed 2026-06-12
Wellens Syndrome A pain-free chest pain patient with deeply inverted or biphasic T waves in V2βV3 has a critical proximal LAD lesion until proven otherwise.
A 58-year-old man arrives at 0300 reporting two days of intermittent substernal pressure with exertion, each episode lasting ten minutes and resolving on its own. He has been pain-free for ninety minutes. Vitals are normal and he looks well β he is asking when he can leave. The triage ECG is read by the machine as 'nonspecific.' On a closer look, V2 and V3 show deep, symmetrically inverted T waves with preserved R wave progression and an isoelectric ST segment. There are no Q waves. The first troponin is 0.04 ng/mL.
Key ECG findings
- Deeply inverted, symmetric T waves in V2βV3 (Type B), or biphasic T waves (initially positive, terminally negative) in V2βV3 (Type A) β sometimes extending to V1 or V4
- Type B is the more common pattern; both predict the same lesion
- ST segment isoelectric or minimally elevated (<1 mm)
- Preserved R wave progression β no pathological Q waves
- Pattern is present during the pain-free interval, not during active angina
Pearls
- Wellens reflects 'ischemic memory' from recent occlusion-and-reperfusion of the proximal LAD. The ECG paradoxically looks worse when the patient feels better, because the pattern only emerges once flow is restored.
- During recurrent pain the pattern can transiently disappear or convert to ST elevation. Resolution of the T wave inversion is not improvement β it can mean reocclusion.
- Troponin is often normal or only mildly elevated. A clean troponin should not lower your urgency or your suspicion.
Pitfalls
- Stress testing a Wellens patient can precipitate anterior infarction. The disposition is the cath lab, not the treadmill.
- Mimics include persistent juvenile T-wave inversions, CNS catastrophe (including SAH), and PE-related right-heart strain β clinical context separates them.
- Computer interpretation routinely misses Wellens. The pattern is subtle and the patient looks well; only the human reader catches it.
At the Bedside
Recognize, then disposition: aspirin and anticoagulation per local ACS pathway, urgent cardiology consult, and admit for catheterization. Do not discharge a pain-free patient with Wellens morphology, even if the troponin is negative.
LITFL ECG Library β Wellens Syndrome · reviewed 2026-05-06
de Winter T Waves A STEMI equivalent β proximal LAD occlusion presenting as prominent symmetric T waves on top of upsloping ST depression in the precordial leads.
A 47-year-old man arrives with crushing substernal chest pain that began forty minutes ago. The triage tracing shows no ST elevation. On a closer look, V2βV5 show prominent, symmetric, peaked T waves rising from upsloping ST depression of about 1.5 mm at the J point. There is small ST elevation in aVR. The pattern is identical on a repeat ECG five minutes later β it does not normalize between bursts of pain. Cardiology is paged.
Key ECG findings
- Tall, broad, symmetric, peaked T waves in V1βV6, most prominent in V2βV4
- Upsloping ST depression (β₯1 mm) at the J point in the precordial leads
- Small ST elevation (β0.5β1 mm) in aVR
- QRS is normal β no Q waves, no bundle branch block
- Pattern is static during pain, not transient (distinguishes it from Wellens)
Pearls
- de Winter is a STEMI equivalent. Treat it like one β cath lab activation, not serial troponins.
- It typically does not evolve into classic ST elevation; the pattern is the disease, not a precursor stage. Waiting for elevation is waiting too long.
- Hyperkalemia gives tall T waves too β but with a widened QRS and isoelectric ST segments. The upsloping ST depression in de Winter is the discriminating feature.
Pitfalls
- Computer interpretation reads it as 'nonspecific T-wave abnormality' or 'anterior subendocardial ischemia.' Both labels under-call the lesion.
- Waiting for evolution to overt STEMI loses the window. Recognize the pattern itself as the activation criterion.
- Easy to misattribute to hyperkalemia in a CKD patient. Check the K+ and the QRS β if K+ is normal and QRS is narrow, the diagnosis is de Winter.
At the Bedside
Treat as anterior STEMI. Aspirin and anticoagulation per local pathway, immediate cardiology activation for catheterization. Do not wait for serial ECGs to show classic ST elevation.
LITFL ECG Library β de Winter T Wave · reviewed 2026-05-06
High Lateral STEMI ST elevation in I and aVL with reciprocal depression in III is an acute high lateral occlusion β subtle, easily called nonspecific, and just as much a STEMI.
A 57-year-old man presents with an hour of left-sided chest heaviness radiating to the jaw. He is diaphoretic, blood pressure 148/90. The triage ECG shows no elevation in the classic anterior or inferior clusters, so the machine reads it as nonspecific. Looking lead by lead, there is ST elevation in lead I and aVL, with a smaller bump in V2. Turn to the inferior leads and there is mirror-image ST depression and T wave inversion, most pronounced in lead III with reciprocal change also in aVF. Laid out on the 4x3 display, the elevation up top and the depression below trace out a distinctive flag-like shape. He remains in pain as the tracing prints.
Key ECG findings
- ST elevation localized primarily to leads I and aVL, sometimes with V2
- Reciprocal ST depression and/or T wave inversion in the inferior leads, most pronounced in lead III
- South African Flag sign: ST elevation in I, aVL and V2 with reciprocal change best seen in III and aVF, forming a flag pattern on the 4x3 display
- Isolated ST elevation in I and aVL points to occlusion of the first diagonal branch (D1) of the LAD
- ST elevation in I, aVL extending to V5-V6 suggests a left circumflex culprit
Pearls
- The South African Flag sign is a deliberate pattern-recognition trick: the elevated leads (I, aVL, V2) and the reciprocally depressed lead (III) light up in the shape of the flag on a standard 4x3 layout, making a subtle infarct jump out.
- The reciprocal ST depression in lead III is often more eye-catching than the primary elevation β let the inferior mirror image point you back up to I and aVL.
- Lead grouping matters: I and aVL sit apart from the standard contiguous clusters, so a high lateral STEMI can hide as scattered, noncontiguous changes rather than an obvious territory.
Pitfalls
- The elevation in I and aVL can be modest and is routinely dismissed as nonspecific, missing an acute coronary occlusion.
- Reading the inferior ST depression as primary inferior ischemia rather than reciprocal change misdirects you away from the lateral culprit.
- Failing to appreciate that isolated I/aVL changes represent a real occluding lesion (D1 or circumflex) can delay activation of the cath lab in a true STEMI.
At the Bedside
Treat it as an acute coronary occlusion: activate the STEMI/cath lab pathway and give ACS therapy rather than waiting for the changes to declare themselves in more leads. Use the reciprocal depression in III to confirm the diagnosis when the elevation in I and aVL is subtle.
LITFL ECG Library β High lateral STEMI · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Ventricular Aneurysm Persistent anterior ST elevation with well-formed Q waves and small T waves weeks after an infarct is a ventricular aneurysm, not a fresh STEMI.
A 60-year-old chronic smoker presents with mild chest pain and shortness of breath. He mentions an episode of severe chest pain about two weeks ago for which he never sought care. He is comfortable now, not diaphoretic, hemodynamically stable. His 12-lead shows ST elevation in the precordial leads with a concave contour, sitting over well-formed, deep QS-type Q waves. The T waves are conspicuously small relative to the tall QRS complexes rather than the fat hyperacute T waves you would expect early in occlusion. There is no reciprocal ST depression, and a prior ECG on the chart looks identical to today's tracing.
Key ECG findings
- ST elevation persisting more than 2 weeks after an acute myocardial infarction, most often in the precordial leads
- Concave or convex ST morphology, usually with well-formed Q- or QS waves
- T waves of relatively small amplitude compared with the QRS, unlike the hyperacute T waves of acute STEMI
- No dynamic ST changes and no reciprocal ST depression; often identical to prior ECGs
- T-wave/QRS amplitude ratio less than 0.36 in all precordial leads favors aneurysm (greater than 0.36 in any precordial lead favors anterior STEMI)
Pearls
- The T-wave/QRS ratio is a validated discriminator: under 0.36 in every precordial lead points to aneurysm, whereas over 0.36 in any precordial lead points to acute anterior STEMI.
- Persistent ST elevation is common after anterior infarcts β some degree remains in 60% of anterior STEMIs (only 5% of inferior), so the finding alone is not automatically acute.
- The pattern of persistent anterior ST elevation plus pathological Q waves is fairly specific (84%) but insensitive (38%) for aneurysm, so its absence does not exclude an aneurysm.
Pitfalls
- The core trap is calling an old aneurysm an acute STEMI and firing off thrombolytics or the cath lab; comparison with a prior ECG showing an identical tracing is the fastest way out.
- Dynamic or progressive ST elevation on serial ECGs, new changes versus an old tracing, or reciprocal depression argue for acute STEMI β a static tracing argues for aneurysm.
- Let the clinical gestalt override the ECG when they disagree: ongoing ischemic pain, a sick, pale, sweaty, or unstable patient should push you toward treating an acute occlusion regardless of the aneurysm-like morphology.
At the Bedside
Get and compare a prior ECG and apply the T/QRS ratio before committing. An unchanged tracing with well-formed Q waves, small T waves, and no reciprocal change supports old aneurysm and spares the patient reperfusion therapy; any dynamic change or high clinical suspicion means treat as acute STEMI.
LITFL ECG Library β Left Ventricular Aneurysm · reviewed 2026-07-06
MI Localization by Lead Groups Mapping ST changes onto lead groups tells you which wall is infarcting and which artery is occluded β the mental model that turns a 12-lead into a coronary angiogram.
A 66-year-old woman with an hour of crushing chest pain and diaphoresis is brought to a resus bay. As the 12-lead prints, you make yourself read it by territory rather than lead by lead: the inferior group (II, III, aVF), the lateral group (I, aVL, V5-6), the anteroseptal precordium (V1-4), and aVR. You are looking for where a wave of ST elevation clusters and where reciprocal depression falls opposite it, so you can name the wall at risk before the troponin returns. The tracing in front of you shows changes concentrated in one of these groups, and the pattern is pointing you toward a specific culprit vessel.
Key ECG findings
- Group the 12 leads by territory: inferior (II, III, aVF), lateral (I, aVL, V5-6), anteroseptal (V1-4), and aVR
- Anterior/anteroseptal changes localize to the LAD territory
- Inferior changes localize to the inferior wall (typically RCA or circumflex)
- Lateral changes point to LAD or circumflex branch territory; high lateral changes to I and aVL
- Posterior involvement is inferred from reciprocal anterior changes and confirmed with posterior leads
Pearls
- Reading by lead group rather than lead by lead is what lets you predict the culprit vessel and the volume of myocardium at risk before angiography.
- Reciprocal depression opposite a territory helps confirm a true injury current, so always check the leads that face away from the suspected wall.
- The territories overlap at their edges β lateral extension of an inferior or anterior MI signals a larger infarct β so localize, then look for extension into adjacent walls.
Pitfalls
- Anchoring on a single lead's ST change misses the territorial pattern; a finding is far more convincing when the whole lead group moves together.
- Posterior and right ventricular infarcts hide from the standard 12-lead and must be actively sought with posterior and right-sided leads.
- Treating localization as academic delays action β the point of naming the wall is to trigger reperfusion for the corresponding STEMI, not to file a diagnosis.
At the Bedside
Use the lead-group map to convert ST changes into a wall and a suspected artery, then act on that territory: activate the cath lab for a localized STEMI and add posterior or right-sided leads when the pattern hints at a hidden territory.
LITFL ECG Library β ECG AMI localisation · reviewed 2026-07-06
Myocardial Ischemia (NSTEACS) Horizontal or downsloping ST depression and dynamic T-wave changes are the ECG face of NSTE-ACS β and widespread depression with ST elevation in aVR points at the left main.
A 64-year-old diabetic woman presents with 40 minutes of chest heaviness and nausea. She is tachycardic and diaphoretic but her pressure holds. The ECG shows flat, horizontal ST-segment depression across leads I, II and V4 through V6, each depression a half to one millimeter below baseline at the J point. In aVR the ST segment is instead elevated by more than a millimeter. The T waves in the lateral leads are shallow and inverting. A tracing from an hour earlier at triage looked different β these changes are new and evolving as you watch the monitor.
Key ECG findings
- ST-segment depression β horizontal or downsloping β₯ 0.5 mm at the J-point in β₯ 2 contiguous leads indicates ischemia; β₯ 1 mm is more specific and conveys worse prognosis
- T-wave flattening or inversion β significant when β₯ 1 mm deep in β₯ 2 contiguous leads with dominant R waves and dynamic
- Widespread ST depression (I, II, V4-6) reflects subendocardial ischemia; when paired with ST elevation in aVR > 1 mm, suspect left main occlusion
- Dynamic change β different from the old ECG or evolving over time β is what makes ST/T changes strongly ischemic
- Less common signs: U-wave inversion, and pseudonormalization of previously inverted T waves
Pearls
- Subendocardial ischemia does NOT localize. ST depression confined to one territory (especially inferior or high-lateral leads) is more likely reciprocal change from a STEMI β go hunt for the subtle ST elevation you're missing.
- Widespread ST depression with β₯ 2 mm depression in β₯ 3 leads carries roughly 35% mortality at 30 days; this pattern is a sick patient, not a soft one.
- Upsloping ST depression, depression < 0.5 mm, T-wave flattening and inversion < 1 mm are all non-specific β don't overcall them, but don't dismiss a convincing story either.
Pitfalls
- LVH and digoxin effect can both mimic ischemic ST/T changes; the discriminator is whether the changes are dynamic compared with baseline.
- T-wave inversion is a normal variant in leads III, aVR and V1 and only counts as ischemic in leads with dominant R waves β don't call physiologic inversion an infarct.
- The aVR-plus-diffuse-depression pattern of left main occlusion is easy to under-triage as 'just NSTEMI' because there's no single obvious ST elevation; treat it as high risk.
At the Bedside
Manage NSTEMI and unstable angina identically in the ED β aspirin, anticoagulation and anti-ischemic therapy per your ACS pathway, serial ECGs to catch dynamic change, and serial troponin (drawn at 8-12 hours to separate NSTEMI from unstable angina). Escalate the diffuse-depression-with-aVR-elevation pattern for urgent cardiology and consideration of emergent angiography for possible left main disease.
LITFL ECG Library β Myocardial Ischaemia · reviewed 2026-07-06
South African Flag Sign ST elevation in I, aVL, and V2 with reciprocal change in III β high lateral STEMI from first diagonal (D1) occlusion, named for the geometry the affected leads make on a 12-lead.
A 55-year-old man presents with anterior chest pain and a 'normal-looking' ECG. Closer inspection shows 1.5 mm of ST elevation in I and aVL, 1 mm of ST elevation in V2, and reciprocal ST depression with T-wave inversion in lead III.
Key ECG findings
- ST elevation in I and aVL
- ST elevation in V2 (without elevation in V3 or V4)
- Reciprocal ST depression and T-wave inversion in lead III
- Inferior leads II and aVF are typically unchanged
- When the affected leads are highlighted on a standard 12-lead layout, the geometry resembles a South African flag β hence the name
Pearls
- The reciprocal change in III is the most reliable confirmatory finding when the elevation in I and aVL is subtle.
- Isolated ST elevation in V2 without V3 involvement is unusual β when it appears alongside high lateral changes, suspect a D1 lesion rather than sampling artifact.
- The 'flag' is a memory aid, not a clinical sign. The diagnosis rests on the lead distribution and reciprocal change, not on whether you see the flag.
Pitfalls
- Easy to dismiss as a non-specific change because no single lead shows dramatic elevation. The pattern across leads is the diagnosis.
- Computer algorithms rarely label this as a STEMI β they look for contiguous lead involvement and miss the disjoint distribution.
- Lead aVL elevation alone, without I or V2, is seen in many situations including LVH and is not specific. Demand the full pattern.
At the Bedside
Treat as STEMI. ASA, anticoagulation per local pathway, cath lab activation. Do not let an unusual lead distribution slow the call β the lesion behind it is as time-critical as a classic anterior infarct.
LITFL ECG Library β High Lateral STEMI (South African Flag Sign) · reviewed 2026-06-12
Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy STEMI-pattern ST elevation in a post-menopausal woman after acute emotional stress may be stress cardiomyopathy β but no ECG safely tells it apart from an infarct.
A 68-year-old woman arrives with crushing substernal chest pain that began an hour after learning of her husband's sudden death. She is tearful, tachycardic, blood pressure 100/70. The ECG shows ST elevation across the precordial leads that looks, lead for lead, like an anterior STEMI. There are no reciprocal changes that reassure you and nothing on the tracing that reads as clearly non-ischemic. A troponin drawn at the bedside is mildly elevated. Her history has no prior cardiac disease, and the story is dominated by an overwhelming emotional shock rather than exertion. Looking at the tracing alone, you cannot say whether a coronary is occluded.
Key ECG findings
- ST elevation that closely mimics STEMI and is difficult to differentiate from it
- New ECG changes are part of the diagnostic criteria: ST elevation or T wave inversion
- Changes accompany ischemic chest pain and often a moderate troponin rise
- No ECG criteria can safely distinguish Takotsubo from STEMI
- Underlying substrate is transient dyskinesis/ballooning of the LV apex, not a fixed coronary occlusion (arteries normal on angiography)
Pearls
- The diagnosis is one of the catheterization lab, not the ECG: angiography showing no coronary stenosis > 50% with the characteristic apical ballooning is what confirms it β so in the ED you cannot rule out STEMI from the tracing.
- Epidemiology sharpens suspicion but never proves it: ~90% of cases worldwide are post-menopausal women after sudden emotional stress, while male cases skew toward physical stress.
- Prognosis is better than a STEMI with a similar ECG but it is not benign β supportive care with LV function usually recovering within 21 days, and large hypokinetic segments carry real thromboembolic risk.
Pitfalls
- Talking yourself out of a STEMI because the story is emotional and the patient is a woman β no ECG feature reliably separates the two, so treat as STEMI when in doubt.
- Underestimating it as a benign 'broken heart' β acutely it can cause the same STEMI-mimicking elevation and its complications.
- Forgetting anticoagulation in patients with large areas of hypokinesis, who are at high risk of cerebrovascular thromboembolic events.
At the Bedside
If you cannot exclude STEMI, activate your local code STEMI protocol and go to angiography β that is what differentiates the two. Once confirmed, management is largely supportive, with anticoagulation for those with large hypokinetic territories to prevent thromboembolic stroke.
LITFL ECG Library β Tako-Tsubo Cardiomyopathy · reviewed 2026-07-06
Rhythm (26)
Atrial Fibrillation Irregularly irregular rhythm without organized P waves β management depends on stability, duration, trigger, and stroke risk.
A 74-year-old woman with pneumonia presents tachycardic and short of breath. The ECG shows an irregularly irregular narrow-complex rhythm at 142 bpm with no consistent P waves and a fibrillatory baseline. Her blood pressure is stable, but she is febrile and hypoxic. The rhythm is real, but the infection is driving it.
Key ECG findings
- Irregularly irregular R-R intervals
- No discrete repeating P waves
- Fibrillatory baseline may be visible, especially in V1
- QRS is usually narrow unless baseline bundle branch block, aberrancy, pre-excitation, or ventricular pacing is present
- Ventricular rate can be slow, controlled, rapid, or extremely rapid in pre-excited AF
Pearls
- Treat the patient, not just the rate. Sepsis, PE, alcohol withdrawal, thyrotoxicosis, pain, hypovolemia, and hypoxia commonly drive AF with RVR.
- Unstable AF gets synchronized cardioversion when the rhythm is causing instability.
- Irregular wide-complex AF should trigger a pre-excitation check before AV nodal blockers.
Pitfalls
- Do not cardiovert stable AF of unclear duration without thinking about anticoagulation/stroke risk and local protocol.
- Do not miss atrial flutter with variable block; it can look irregular.
- Do not reflexively stack AV nodal blockers in a patient whose RVR is compensatory for shock.
At the Bedside
Determine stability first. If unstable from AF, cardiovert. If stable, treat triggers, choose rate/rhythm strategy per duration/comorbidities, and address anticoagulation/disposition.
LITFL ECG Library β Atrial Fibrillation · reviewed 2026-05-11
Atrial Flutter A regular narrow tachycardia near 150 is atrial flutter with 2:1 block until proven otherwise.
A 61-year-old man presents with palpitations. The ECG shows a narrow-complex rhythm at 150 bpm that appears regular. The machine calls it sinus tachycardia. In the inferior leads, small negative sawtooth waves march through the baseline, with one buried in each QRS complex and one visible between complexes.
Key ECG findings
- Sawtooth flutter waves, classically negative in II, III, and aVF in typical counterclockwise flutter
- Atrial rate often around 250β350 bpm
- 2:1 AV conduction commonly produces a ventricular rate near 150 bpm
- Variable block can make the ventricular rhythm irregular
- Flutter waves may be hidden in QRS/T waves and become clearer with vagal maneuvers or adenosine
Pearls
- Rate around 150 should make you actively hunt for flutter.
- Adenosine may reveal flutter waves by transiently increasing AV block; it usually does not terminate typical flutter.
- Flutter has thromboembolic risk like AF and needs the same anticoagulation thinking.
Pitfalls
- Do not call every regular 150 rhythm sinus tachycardia. Sinus tach usually has a reason and visible sinus P waves.
- Do not assume rate control will be easy; flutter often resists AV nodal blockade.
- Do not forget that variable block can make flutter look like AF.
At the Bedside
Assess stability. Cardiovert if unstable. If stable, pursue rate or rhythm strategy per local protocol, evaluate duration and anticoagulation needs, and treat triggers.
LITFL ECG Library β Atrial Flutter · reviewed 2026-06-12
Polymorphic VT Polymorphic VT is a malignant ventricular rhythm; QT status separates torsades from ischemic polymorphic VT.
A 63-year-old man with crushing chest pain has repeated runs of wide-complex tachycardia with changing QRS morphology and axis. Between episodes, the QT interval is not prolonged, but there is anterior ST depression with aVR elevation. A second patient on methadone has similar twisting VT but a QTc of 610 ms. Same rhythm family, different treatment priorities.
Key ECG findings
- Wide-complex tachycardia with beat-to-beat variation in QRS morphology and axis
- May be sustained or nonsustained; can degenerate into VF
- QT prolongation suggests torsades de pointes
- Normal QT polymorphic VT suggests acute ischemia or scar-related electrical instability
- Often presents with syncope, shock, chest pain, or cardiac arrest
Pearls
- Always ask: polymorphic VT with long QT, or polymorphic VT with normal QT? The answer changes the next medication and trigger hunt.
- Ischemic polymorphic VT is a cath-lab problem as much as an antiarrhythmic problem.
- Defibrillation is the treatment when pulseless or unstable; do not overthink morphology during arrest.
Pitfalls
- Do not reflexively give magnesium and stop thinking; magnesium is key for torsades, but ischemic PMVT needs ischemia treatment.
- Do not use synchronized cardioversion when the rhythm is too chaotic to sync reliably; defibrillate if unstable/pulseless.
- Do not miss QT-prolonging meds and electrolytes after the rhythm terminates.
At the Bedside
If unstable or pulseless, defibrillate. If perfusing, determine QT status, correct electrolytes, treat ischemia aggressively, and use expert-guided antiarrhythmic therapy based on suspected mechanism.
LITFL ECG Library β Polymorphic VT · reviewed 2026-05-11
Supraventricular Tachycardia / Undifferentiated SVT Regular narrow-complex tachycardia without clear P waves is usually AVNRT or AVRT at the bedside β stability determines the first move.
A 28-year-old patient has sudden-onset palpitations while at rest. The ECG shows a regular narrow-complex tachycardia at 196 bpm. P waves are not clearly visible, and the QRS complexes are narrow and identical. The patient is anxious but normotensive.
Key ECG findings
- Regular narrow-complex tachycardia, commonly 150β250 bpm
- P waves absent, retrograde, buried in QRS, or visible just after QRS depending on mechanism
- QRS usually narrow unless aberrancy or pre-existing bundle branch block is present
- Onset and termination are often abrupt
- Includes AVNRT, orthodromic AVRT, atrial tachycardia, and other supraventricular mechanisms
Pearls
- Modified Valsalva is a real treatment, not a placebo, and should be done correctly before medication when stable.
- Adenosine is diagnostic and therapeutic for AV-node-dependent SVT, but warn the patient before giving it.
- Capture a 12-lead before and after conversion if possible; baseline delta waves change the future plan.
Pitfalls
- Do not use adenosine casually in irregular wide-complex tachycardia.
- Do not miss sinus tachycardia from shock, sepsis, PE, or withdrawal; sinus tach usually has visible P waves and a clinical driver.
- Do not discharge recurrent SVT without considering WPW, triggers, and follow-up.
At the Bedside
If unstable, synchronized cardioversion. If stable regular narrow SVT, use modified Valsalva then adenosine per protocol, obtain post-conversion ECG, and plan follow-up/disposition based on recurrence and risk.
LITFL ECG Library β Supraventricular Tachycardia · reviewed 2026-06-12
Torsades de Pointes Polymorphic VT in the setting of prolonged QT β treat the rhythm and remove the trigger.
A 44-year-old woman treated with methadone and ondansetron becomes lightheaded, then briefly loses consciousness. The monitor shows a rapid wide-complex rhythm whose QRS axis appears to twist above and below the baseline. Between bursts, the ECG shows a markedly prolonged QT interval with a long pause before the next run. She wakes up pale and diaphoretic as the rhythm self-terminates.
Key ECG findings
- Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with QRS amplitude and axis waxing and waning around the baseline
- Occurs in the setting of prolonged QT or prominent pause-dependent QT prolongation
- Often initiated by a premature ventricular beat after a long-short sequence
- May be self-terminating or deteriorate into ventricular fibrillation
- Baseline ECG often shows QTc prolongation, bradycardia, electrolyte abnormality, or offending drugs
Pearls
- Magnesium is first-line even if the serum magnesium level is normal.
- Pause-dependent torsades improves by increasing the heart rate: overdrive pacing or isoproterenol can be the bridge when recurrent despite magnesium.
- Think medication stack: methadone, antipsychotics, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, antiemetics, and electrolyte depletion often combine.
Pitfalls
- Do not treat torsades like stable monomorphic VT with QT-prolonging antiarrhythmics; that can worsen the substrate.
- Polymorphic VT with a normal QT is often ischemic until proven otherwise and needs a different pathway.
- QTc measurement after the event matters; the monitor strip alone tells you the rhythm, not the cause.
At the Bedside
If pulseless or unstable, defibrillate. If perfusing, give magnesium sulfate 2 g IV, correct potassium/magnesium, stop QT-prolonging drugs, and consider overdrive pacing or isoproterenol for recurrent pause-dependent episodes.
LITFL ECG Library β Torsades de Pointes · reviewed 2026-05-11
VT vs SVT with Aberrancy When the wide tachycardia diagnosis is uncertain, the ED-safe answer is to treat as VT.
A 58-year-old patient with palpitations has a regular wide-complex tachycardia at 165 bpm. The team debates SVT with aberrancy because he is awake and talking. A closer look shows an extreme superior axis and no RS complexes in the precordial leads. There is no old ECG available.
Key ECG findings
- VT clues: AV dissociation, capture beats, fusion beats, extreme axis, precordial concordance, very broad QRS
- SVT with aberrancy is more likely when QRS morphology matches a known baseline bundle branch block
- Irregular wide-complex tachycardia raises different diagnoses: AF with aberrancy, pre-excited AF, polymorphic VT
- Clinical history matters: prior MI, structural heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and older age favor VT
- Algorithms can help but should not delay stabilization
Pearls
- If you are wrong treating SVT as VT, the patient usually tolerates it. If you are wrong treating VT as SVT with AV nodal blockers, the patient may not.
- An old ECG is high-yield: the same BBB morphology during sinus rhythm supports SVT with aberrancy.
- Regularity is step one. Regular WCT and irregular WCT have different dangerous branches.
Pitfalls
- Do not use hemodynamic stability to distinguish VT from SVT; VT can be stable.
- Do not use adenosine casually in irregular or polymorphic wide-complex rhythms.
- Do not let algorithm memorization replace the key ED heuristic: uncertain WCT equals VT-safe management.
At the Bedside
Assess stability first. Cardiovert unstable patients. For stable regular WCT, manage with a VT-safe pathway while seeking old ECGs, expert help, and diagnostic clarification.
LITFL ECG Library β VT versus SVT · reviewed 2026-06-12
Ventricular Fibrillation VF is chaotic ventricular electrical activity with no organized perfusion β shock first, diagnose later.
EMS rolls in doing compressions. The monitor shows a chaotic irregular waveform without identifiable QRS complexes. There is no pulse. The team confirms pad contact and immediately defibrillates while CPR continues. After the shock, compressions resume before anyone stops to analyze the rhythm again.
Key ECG findings
- Chaotic irregular waveform without organized QRS complexes
- No consistent rate, axis, or repeating morphology
- Coarse VF has larger amplitude; fine VF may resemble asystole or artifact
- Clinical correlation is mandatory: patient is pulseless and unresponsive
- Can be mimicked by motion artifact, loose leads, or shivering
Pearls
- VF is a shockable arrest rhythm. The first meaningful intervention is defibrillation plus high-quality CPR.
- Fine VF can look like asystole; if uncertain, check leads/gain and clinical context quickly without prolonging pulse checks.
- Post-ROSC ECG matters: STEMI, hyperkalemia, tox, and inherited arrhythmias are all possible causes.
Pitfalls
- Do not spend long seconds debating the rhythm while compressions are paused.
- Do not shock artifact in an awake patient; always correlate the monitor with the patient.
- Do not forget reversible causes after ROSC; the ECG after resuscitation often reveals the trigger.
At the Bedside
Defibrillate, resume CPR immediately, follow ACLS shockable rhythm algorithm, and search for reversible causes during rhythm checks and after ROSC.
LITFL ECG Library β Ventricular Fibrillation · reviewed 2026-05-11
Ventricular Tachycardia β Overview / Monomorphic A regular wide-complex tachycardia is VT until proven otherwise, especially in an older or structurally abnormal heart.
A 69-year-old man with prior MI presents with palpitations and lightheadedness. The monitor shows a regular wide-complex tachycardia at 178 bpm. The QRS is very broad, concordant across the precordial leads, and occasional capture beats appear on the rhythm strip. His blood pressure is 92 systolic and he is increasingly diaphoretic.
Key ECG findings
- Regular wide-complex tachycardia, usually QRS >120 ms and often much wider
- AV dissociation, capture beats, or fusion beats strongly support VT
- Extreme axis, precordial concordance, or very broad QRS supports VT
- History of MI, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, or older age increases pretest probability
- Can be stable initially but deteriorate suddenly
Pearls
- The safest ED default for undifferentiated regular WCT is VT.
- Stable does not mean benign. Stability only determines whether you have seconds or minutes to act.
- Capture and fusion beats are diagnostic gifts; search the rhythm strip before labeling SVT with aberrancy.
Pitfalls
- Do not give verapamil or diltiazem to undifferentiated WCT.
- Do not rely on the patient's age alone; young patients can have VT, and old patients can have SVT with aberrancy.
- Do not let a pulse delay cardioversion when the patient is hypotensive, altered, ischemic, or in shock.
At the Bedside
If unstable, perform synchronized cardioversion. If stable monomorphic VT, use local antiarrhythmic pathway and expert consultation; keep pads on and prepare for deterioration.
LITFL ECG Library β Ventricular Tachycardia · reviewed 2026-05-11
Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm A regular wide-complex rhythm at 50-120 bpm just after reperfusion is usually a benign ventricular escape focus outrunning the sinus node β not VT.
A 62-year-old man is 40 minutes out from thrombolysis for an anterior STEMI and his chest pain has largely settled. On the monitor the rhythm becomes regular and broad, with a QRS well over 120 ms, running at about 75 per minute. There are no clearly conducted P waves in front of the wide beats; instead a dissociated P wave marches through independently, deforming an occasional complex. Every few beats a narrower, normally conducted complex breaks through, and one beat looks intermediate in width β a hybrid between the wide and narrow morphologies. He is warm, alert, and normotensive, asking whether he can sit up. The rate is too slow to call it tachycardia and too fast to call it an escape rhythm.
Key ECG findings
- Regular rhythm, rate typically 50-120 bpm β faster than the sinus/ventricular escape range but below VT
- Three or more ventricular complexes with QRS duration > 120 ms
- Fusion and capture beats as the sinus and ventricular pacemakers compete
- AV dissociation, sometimes isorhythmic (sinus and ventricular rates nearly identical) with dissociated P waves deforming the QRS
- Classically appears in the reperfusion phase of an acute STEMI, e.g. post-thrombolysis or after ROSC
Pearls
- The rate is the discriminator: a wide regular rhythm under about 110 bpm that emerged as the patient reperfused is far more likely AIVR than VT. Rates < 50 point to a ventricular escape rhythm, > 110 toward VT.
- It is usually well-tolerated, benign, and self-limiting, resolving on its own once the sinus rate again overtakes the ventricular focus. Watching is often the whole management.
- A taller left rabbit ear in V1 (taller initial R of a notched R wave) and independent dissociated P waves are your bedside clues that the wide beats are truly ventricular in origin.
Pitfalls
- Mistaking AIVR for VT and giving an antiarrhythmic can abolish the only functioning pacemaker and cause precipitous hemodynamic deterioration β avoid them.
- Isorhythmic AV dissociation, where atrial and ventricular rates are identical, creates the illusion of an association between the chambers; do not read it as normal sinus conduction.
- Anchoring on 'reperfusion arrhythmia = benign' without checking a rate and blood pressure β the same wide morphology at > 110 bpm is VT, a different problem entirely.
At the Bedside
Recognize it, then mostly leave it alone: treat the underlying cause (restore or confirm myocardial perfusion, correct electrolytes) and monitor rather than reaching for antiarrhythmics. Reserve intervention for the low-output patient who needs atrial kick, where atropine may be trialed to speed the sinus rate and reclaim AV synchrony.
LITFL ECG Library β Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm (AIVR) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Atrioventricular Re-entry Tachycardia (AVRT) A regular SVT with retrograde P waves at a long RP interval β or a regular broad-complex tachycardia in a young patient β should raise an accessory pathway.
A 24-year-old man presents with the abrupt onset of palpitations and lightheadedness that began while lifting weights. Blood pressure is 108/70, he is alert. The monitor shows a regular narrow-complex tachycardia at 200 bpm. Studying V1, you find a small notch at the beginning of each T wave β a retrograde P wave sitting well after the QRS, giving a long RP interval. The QRS complexes are narrow, under 120 ms, and their amplitude varies slightly from beat to beat even though the baseline is steady. There are no clear delta waves during the tachycardia. He mentions he has been told before that his 'resting ECG looked unusual.'
Key ECG findings
- Regular tachycardia, rate usually 200-300 bpm
- Orthodromic form: narrow QRS (<120 ms) with retrograde P waves at a long RP interval (>70 ms), often a notch at the start of the T wave in V1 or lead III
- Antidromic form: regular broad-complex tachycardia from anterograde conduction down the accessory pathway, easily mistaken for VT
- QRS alternans (phasic beat-to-beat variation in QRS amplitude with a normal QRS amplitude)
- Features of pre-excitation (delta wave) are lost during the tachycardia and may reappear in sinus rhythm
- Rate-related ischemia is common
Pearls
- The long RP interval is the fingerprint that separates orthodromic AVRT from typical AVNRT: in AVNRT the retrograde P is early (buried in the QRS or a pseudo-R' at its terminal portion), in AVRT it lands later after the QRS.
- Reversion to sinus rhythm can be diagnostic β a WPW pattern appearing on the post-conversion ECG confirms the tachycardia was orthodromic AVRT; tall R waves in V1-3 point to a left-sided pathway.
- In a young child, a regular broad-complex tachycardia is far more likely SVT with aberrancy than VT β over 95% of pediatric broad-complex tachycardias are SVT.
Pitfalls
- Antidromic AVRT is a regular broad-complex tachycardia indistinguishable from VT at the bedside β if in doubt, treat as VT.
- Giving an AV nodal blocker (adenosine, verapamil) in a pre-excited rhythm carries a small but real risk of inducing AF, which can then conduct rapidly down the accessory pathway and precipitate cardiac arrest.
- Any AV nodal blocker can provoke AF even in orthodromic AVRT β if verapamil is used, observe for at least 4 hours.
At the Bedside
Cardiovert any unstable patient immediately. In stable orthodromic AVRT, slow AV nodal conduction stepwise β vagal maneuvers, then adenosine and/or verapamil. In stable antidromic AVRT, avoid AV nodal blockade and target the pathway with procainamide (first line), with cardioversion held in reserve.
LITFL ECG Library β Atrioventricular Re-entry Tachycardia (AVRT) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Bidirectional Ventricular Tachycardia A wide-complex tachycardia whose QRS axis flips beat-to-beat is severe digoxin toxicity until proven otherwise.
An 80-year-old woman on digoxin for atrial fibrillation is brought in nauseated, confused, and unwell after several days of poor oral intake. On the monitor you catch a wide-complex tachycardia, and something about it is peculiar: every alternate beat looks different. Running a 12-lead, you see the frontal-plane QRS axis swing a full 180 degrees from one beat to the next β leftward, then rightward, then leftward again, a metronomic beat-to-beat alternation of the complexes. There is frequent multifocal ectopy scattered through the strip. She is hypotensive and lethargic but still perfusing. Her family mentions her kidney function has been declining and she 'takes a heart pill every day.'
Key ECG findings
- Beat-to-beat alternation of the frontal-plane QRS axis, classically shifting a full 180 degrees from left to right with each alternate beat
- An alternative described pattern is alternating left and right bundle-branch block morphology
- Frequently accompanied by multifocal ventricular ectopy, especially in the setting of digoxin poisoning
- Wide-complex tachycardia of ventricular origin
Pearls
- The alternating axis is the tell β a wide-complex tachycardia where every other beat looks like its mirror image should immediately raise digoxin toxicity in the right patient.
- In a younger patient with exertional or catecholamine-driven onset, think familial CPVT: the paper describes BVT emerging after about a minute of exercise and receding during recovery.
- Herbal aconite poisoning is a reported cause β ask about supplements and non-prescription remedies when the digoxin and CPVT stories don't fit.
Pitfalls
- Calling it ordinary polymorphic VT or artifact and cardioverting without treating the underlying cause β in digoxin toxicity the fix is the antidote, not just electricity.
- Assuming a therapeutic digoxin level excludes toxicity in a dehydrated elderly patient with worsening renal function, where levels climb.
- Missing the diagnosis in an exercise or stress-test setting, where CPVT-driven BVT can escalate to more dangerous ventricular arrhythmias.
At the Bedside
Recognize BVT as a marker of severe digoxin toxicity and treat the poisoning β digoxin-specific antibody (Fab) therapy β rather than chasing the rhythm alone; in the young patient without digoxin exposure, pursue CPVT and toxic exposures such as aconite.
LITFL ECG Library β Bidirectional Ventricular Tachycardia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Focal Atrial Tachycardia A narrow-complex tachycardia with abnormal but uniform P waves before every QRS is a single atrial focus firing outside the sinus node.
A 62-year-old woman presents with a few hours of palpitations and mild breathlessness. She is comfortable, with a blood pressure of 128/76 and a regular pulse around 120. The 12-lead shows a narrow-complex tachycardia. Every QRS is preceded by a P wave, but the P waves look wrong: upright in V1 and inverted in the inferior leads II, III, and aVF. Their shape is identical from beat to beat, and the baseline between them is flat rather than sawtoothed. The QRS complexes themselves are normal. On the medication list is digoxin, and you note the ventricular response is slower than the atrial rate would suggest.
Key ECG findings
- Atrial rate greater than 100 bpm from a single ectopic focus outside the sinus node
- Abnormal P-wave morphology and axis (e.g. inverted in the inferior leads) reflecting the ectopic origin
- Unifocal, identical P waves preceding each QRS, consistent throughout the tracing
- Isoelectric baseline between P waves, unlike the continuous undulation of atrial flutter
- Normal QRS morphology unless there is pre-existing bundle branch block, an accessory pathway, or rate-related aberrancy
Pearls
- The uniform abnormal P wave is the discriminator: consistent, non-sinus morphology means one focus (focal AT), separating it from the sawtooth of flutter and the varying P waves of multifocal atrial tachycardia β and management differs across the three.
- AV block during the tachycardia is usually just a physiologic response to the fast atrial rate, so a slow ventricular rate does not exclude atrial tachycardia.
- Sustained atrial tachycardia, though rare, can drive a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy over time, so it is not always benign.
Pitfalls
- Atrial tachycardia with AV block plus a paradoxically slow ventricular rate ('PAT with block') should prompt thought of digoxin toxicity, where vagotonic AV nodal suppression is the mechanism.
- A flat isoelectric baseline distinguishes it from atrial flutter β miscall the baseline and you may treat the wrong rhythm.
- Look for reversible drivers named in the source β digoxin toxicity, ischemic atrial scarring, catecholamine or stimulant excess (cocaine, caffeine), and alcohol β rather than reflexively rate-controlling.
At the Bedside
Distinguish focal AT from flutter and MAT because treatment diverges, and hunt for a precipitant. If the P-wave and rate picture suggests digoxin toxicity, check the level and reconsider AV nodal agents rather than pushing more.
LITFL ECG Library β Atrial Tachycardia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Idiopathic Fascicular Ventricular Tachycardia A relatively narrow, RBBB-pattern VT with left axis deviation in a young, healthy patient is fascicular VT β verapamil-sensitive, and misdiagnosed as SVT with aberrancy at your peril.
A 28-year-old man with no medical history presents with palpitations and lightheadedness that started at rest. He is alert and talking, blood pressure 108/70. The monitor shows a regular broad-complex tachycardia, but the QRS looks oddly narrow for a wide-complex rhythm β around 120 ms. There is an RBBB morphology with an RSR' in V1 and marked left axis deviation. Running the lead II rhythm strip, you catch occasional P waves that march through independently, and one beat mid-strip is suddenly narrow and early. The rate is fast and sustained, and he has had brief episodes like this before that resolved on their own.
Key ECG findings
- Monomorphic VT with signs of AV dissociation, fusion complexes, or capture beats
- QRS duration 100-140 ms β narrower than other forms of VT
- Short RS interval (onset of R to nadir of S) of 60-80 ms, versus > 100 ms in most VT
- RBBB pattern (RSR' in V1)
- Axis deviation by subtype: left axis deviation in the common posterior fascicular VT (90-95%), right axis in anterior fascicular VT
Pearls
- Fascicular VT is the most common idiopathic VT of the left ventricle, arising by re-entry near the left posterior fascicle in structurally normal hearts β typically young patients, 15-40 years, 60-80% male.
- The whole game is proving it is VT and not SVT with RBBB: look for dissociated P waves, a narrow capture beat, or fusion complexes on a rhythm strip before you commit.
- It is verapamil-sensitive and characteristically does not respond to adenosine, vagal maneuvers, or lidocaine β so a rhythm that ignores adenosine is a clue, not a failure.
Pitfalls
- The relatively narrow QRS and RBBB+LAD pattern is routinely mislabeled SVT with bifascicular block; missing the AV dissociation means missing that this is VT.
- An identical-looking fascicular VT can be driven by digoxin toxicity via enhanced automaticity β in that setting the treatment is digoxin immune Fab, not verapamil.
- Do not reflexively reach for the usual VT drugs: this rhythm is often unresponsive to lidocaine, and treating it as ordinary VT wastes time.
At the Bedside
In a stable patient, once you have confirmed VT, verapamil is first-line and often terminates it. If there is any suspicion of digoxin toxicity, give digoxin immune Fab instead; treat the unstable patient with electrical cardioversion.
LITFL ECG Library β Idiopathic Fascicular Ventricular Tachycardia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Junctional Escape Rhythm A regular narrow-complex rhythm at 40-60 bpm with no relationship to the P waves is the AV junction stepping in when everything above it has failed.
An 80-year-old woman on digoxin for atrial fibrillation is brought in lethargic. The rate is regular at 60. The QRS complexes are narrow, under 120 milliseconds, and they march out at perfectly even intervals. The baseline, though, is not flat β it is a chaotic, irregular fibrillatory line with atrial activity far faster than the ventricles. Nowhere is there a consistent P wave tied to a QRS; the atrial chaos and the crisp regular ventricular rhythm are utterly dissociated. A once-irregular atrial fibrillation has become strikingly regular on the monitor.
Key ECG findings
- Regular rhythm at 40-60 bpm
- Narrow QRS complexes (< 120 ms), because activation originates at the AV junction and travels normally down the His-Purkinje system
- No relationship between the QRS complexes and any preceding atrial activity β P waves, flutter waves, or fibrillatory waves
- 'Regularized AF': atrial fibrillation with a regular narrow-complex ventricular response indicates complete heart block with a junctional escape
- Rate-based terminology: < 40 bpm junctional bradycardia, 40-60 escape, 60-100 accelerated junctional, > 100 junctional tachycardia
Pearls
- The junction escapes because faster impulses from above have failed to arrive β think sinus arrest, SA exit block, or high-grade/complete AV block β so the escape rhythm is a symptom, not the disease. Find why the sinus node went quiet.
- A junctional escape at 40-60 is protective backup; suppressing or pacing over it without addressing the cause can remove the only rhythm keeping the patient perfused.
- Atrial fibrillation that suddenly becomes regular ('regularized AF') is classically a fingerprint of digoxin toxicity producing complete heart block.
Pitfalls
- Don't call a regular narrow rhythm 'sinus' just because it looks organized β hunt for whether the atrial activity actually conducts to the ventricles; dissociation is the tell.
- Reach for the reversible causes: hyperkalemia and beta-blocker, calcium-channel blocker, or digoxin poisoning all suppress the sinus node and unmask junctional escape.
- Coarse atrial fibrillation can be mistaken for flutter; what matters is recognizing that a regular ventricular response over a fibrillating atrium means the atrial impulses aren't conducting at all.
At the Bedside
Recognition redirects you from the rhythm to its cause: check a potassium, review rate-slowing and digoxin dosing, and stop the offending drug. If the escape rate is too slow to perfuse and the patient is symptomatic, treat the bradycardia (atropine, transcutaneous pacing) while correcting the underlying etiology; in suspected digoxin toxicity consider digoxin-specific antibody fragments.
LITFL ECG Library β Junctional Escape Rhythm · reviewed 2026-07-06
Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia (MAT) An irregularly irregular tachycardia with at least three P-wave shapes in one lead is MAT β a marker of a sick, decompensating patient.
A 74-year-old man with severe COPD is in respiratory distress from an exacerbation, on continuous nebulized beta-agonists and looking exhausted. The monitor shows a fast, irregular rhythm, and you order a 12-lead to sort out whether this is atrial fibrillation. On the tracing the rhythm is irregularly irregular at about 130 bpm β but there clearly are P waves, and they keep changing shape. Studying a single lead you count at least three distinct P-wave morphologies, each with its own PR interval, and the baseline between them is flat with no flutter waves. There is right axis deviation with a dominant R wave in V1. His potassium is low and he is tiring.
Key ECG findings
- Heart rate > 100 bpm (usually 100-150)
- Irregularly irregular rhythm with varying P-P, PR and R-R intervals
- At least 3 distinct P-wave morphologies in the same lead
- Isoelectric baseline between P waves (no flutter waves), with no single dominant atrial pacemaker
- Frequently accompanying signs of COPD such as right axis deviation and a dominant R wave in V1 (cor pulmonale)
Pearls
- MAT is a transitional rhythm between frequent PACs and atrial flutter/fibrillation β the presence of organized but polymorphic P waves is what separates it from AF.
- It is a barometer of severe underlying illness: developing MAT during an acute illness carries roughly 60% in-hospital mortality, with death from the illness, not the arrhythmia.
- Because the driver is increased atrial automaticity from hypoxia, hypercarbia, beta-agonists, theophylline, and electrolyte depletion, fixing the patient fixes the rhythm.
Pitfalls
- Miscalling MAT as atrial fibrillation and reaching for rate/rhythm control or anticoagulation instead of treating the respiratory failure.
- Treating the rate directly and aggressively rather than the cause β the arrhythmia typically resolves once the underlying disorder is corrected.
- Overlooking correctable contributors: hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia (often from diuretics and beta-agonists) feed the automaticity.
At the Bedside
Treat the underlying illness β optimize oxygenation and ventilation in the COPD/CHF exacerbation and replete potassium and magnesium β rather than targeting the rhythm; recognize MAT as a red flag for a critically ill patient who needs escalated care.
LITFL ECG Library β Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia (MAT) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Sinus Bradycardia Sinus rhythm under 60 is often physiologic, but it is also the ECG face of inferior MI, hypothyroidism, hyperkalemia, and a long list of overdoses.
A 15-year-old girl is brought in by her parents for fatigue and feeling faint. She is thin and quiet; heart rate reads 35 on the monitor. The 12-lead shows a regular sinus rhythm β a normal upright P wave before every QRS in lead II β but the rate is strikingly slow. Scanning the precordial leads, you notice prominent U waves after the T waves. Blood pressure is low-normal and she is mentating well. Her parents mention she has been eating very little and has lost a lot of weight over the past several months.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus rhythm with a resting heart rate < 60 bpm in adults (or below the age-normal range in children)
- Normal P wave morphology and P-QRS relationship β each QRS preceded by a sinus P wave
- Prominent U waves in the precordial leads are a common accompanying finding
- Rate can be profound (e.g. 35 bpm) in causes such as anorexia nervosa
Pearls
- Sort the cause into physiologic (sleep, athletic vagal tone, pain) versus pathologic before you treat β a fit athlete at 50 and a hypothermic overdose at 35 are not the same problem.
- Bradycardia is a vital-sign clue to systemic disease: inferior MI, hypothyroidism, hypothermia, anorexia nervosa, and electrolyte derangements like hyperkalemia all present this way.
- Run the drug list every time β beta-blockers, verapamil and diltiazem, digoxin, clonidine and dexmedetomidine, amiodarone, opiates, GABA-ergic agents, and organophosphates all slow the sinus node.
Pitfalls
- Sinus bradycardia can be indistinguishable from type II sinoatrial block; do not assume a benign sinus mechanism without scrutinizing the P waves.
- In children the threshold is age-dependent, so a rate that is normal for an adult may be bradycardic for an infant β use age-specific ranges.
- Attributing a slow rate to 'athletic heart' can mask an evolving inferior MI, hyperkalemia, or an occult ingestion.
At the Bedside
Recognition redirects the workup toward the cause: check a temperature, thyroid function, potassium, and a medication and ingestion history, and get an ECG looking for inferior MI. Treat the underlying driver rather than reflexively chasing the number.
LITFL ECG Library β Sinus Bradycardia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Sinus Node Dysfunction (Sick Sinus Syndrome) Syncope with documented long sinus pauses or alternating brady-tachy is sick sinus syndrome β pacing is the answer only when symptoms and ECG line up.
A 78-year-old woman presents after a syncopal episode at home, now recovered but shaken, describing weeks of fatigue, dizziness and palpitations. Her telemetry tells a strange story: runs of a fast, narrow-complex junctional tachycardia around 140 bpm abruptly give way to profound slowing, with the sinus rate dropping from 40 bpm to nearly nothing and a pause stretching to six seconds before the next beat surfaces. At other moments there are stretches with no P waves at all for more than three seconds. She takes a beta-blocker and digoxin. Between episodes her rhythm looks almost ordinary, which is why three prior clinic visits found nothing.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus bradycardia and sinus arrest (pauses > 3 seconds, absent P waves)
- Sinoatrial exit block and inappropriate sinus arrhythmia in the elderly
- Bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome: alternating bradycardia with paroxysmal (often supraventricular) tachycardia, with delayed sinus recovery on termination
- Atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular response
- Abnormalities are characteristically intermittent and variable, so a single ECG can look normal
Pearls
- The dangerous moment is often after the tachycardia stops: the suppressed sinus node fails to recover, producing the long pause that drops cardiac output and causes syncope.
- Always hunt for extrinsic, reversible causes first β beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, hypothyroidism, and hyperkalemia can all mimic or unmask sick sinus syndrome.
- Pacing requires correlation of the ECG abnormality with symptoms; an asymptomatic pause or a rate < 40 from necessary drug therapy alone is not itself an indication.
Pitfalls
- Discharging the patient because the resting ECG between episodes is normal β the disease is intermittent and demands prolonged monitoring to capture.
- Pacing asymptomatic bradycardia, or bradycardia clearly documented as unrelated to the patient's symptoms β a Class III (potentially harmful) indication.
- Missing an iatrogenic cause and implanting a pacemaker when simply stopping a nonessential rate-slowing drug would have resolved it.
At the Bedside
Capture the rhythm during symptoms with continuous/prolonged monitoring, strip away reversible extrinsic contributors (nonessential AV-nodal drugs, hypothyroidism, electrolyte derangement), and refer for permanent pacemaker only once symptomatic bradycardia is documented to correlate with the ECG.
LITFL ECG Library β Sinus Node Dysfunction · reviewed 2026-07-06
Sinus Tachycardia Sinus rhythm above 100 bpm is almost always a symptom of something else β the number to fix is rarely the heart rate itself.
A 34-year-old presents feeling their heart racing. On the monitor the rate is 150 and regular, with narrow QRS complexes. You look for P waves and at first can't find them β then you notice each T wave has an odd extra hump on its upstroke, a 'camel hump' where the P wave is buried in the preceding T. The rhythm is regular but not rigidly so, and it doesn't start or stop abruptly. The patient is warm and mildly diaphoretic. There is no bundle branch pattern, no delta wave β just a fast, narrow, regular tracing with hidden P waves.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus rhythm with a resting rate > 100 bpm in adults (or above the age-appropriate normal range in children)
- Narrow QRS complexes with a normal, upright sinus P-wave axis when P waves are visible
- At very fast rates the P waves may be hidden within the preceding T wave, producing a 'camel hump' appearance
- Regular rhythm with gradual onset and offset rather than abrupt start/stop
- Pediatric thresholds differ by age: newborn 110-150, 2 years 85-125, 4 years 75-115, 6 years and up 60-100 bpm
Pearls
- Sinus tachycardia is usually secondary β treat the cause (hypovolemia, hypoxia, sepsis, pain, anemia, PE, hyperthyroidism, withdrawal), not the number. Rate-controlling a compensatory tachycardia can be dangerous.
- Finding the buried P wave in the T-wave 'camel hump' is what separates sinus tachycardia from a re-entrant SVT and keeps you from reaching for adenosine inappropriately.
- Inappropriate sinus tachycardia is a diagnosis of exclusion β reserved for symptomatic persistent sinus tachycardia only after the secondary causes have been ruled out.
Pitfalls
- Don't anchor on 'anxiety' or 'caffeine' before excluding pulmonary embolism, occult hemorrhage, sepsis, and hyperthyroidism β sinus tach is often the body's first warning.
- At 150 bpm sinus tachycardia is easily confused with atrial flutter with 2:1 block or a regular SVT; the gradual rate variation and hidden sinus P waves distinguish it.
- Consider a drug cause when the story fits β beta-agonists, sympathomimetics like cocaine and amphetamines, anticholinergics, and theophylline all drive the sinus node.
At the Bedside
Resist the urge to slow the rate directly; instead search for and treat the underlying trigger β volume for hypovolemia, oxygen for hypoxia, source control and antibiotics for sepsis, and specific therapy for hyperthyroidism, PE, or withdrawal. The disposition is driven by the cause you uncover, not by the tachycardia in isolation.
LITFL ECG Library β Sinus tachycardia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Ventricular Escape Rhythm A slow, broad-complex rhythm at 20-40 bpm with no relationship to any P waves is the ventricle's last-resort pacemaker taking over.
A 76-year-old woman is brought in obtunded and profoundly bradycardic after feeling dizzy at home. Her blood pressure is barely palpable. The monitor shows a regular but extremely slow rhythm, around 25 bpm. Each beat is a wide QRS, well over 120 ms, with a left bundle branch appearance. On the 12-lead you can find occasional P waves marching at their own independent rate, bearing no consistent relationship to the broad complexes below them. There are no pacing spikes. The complexes are uniform and regular but agonizingly slow. You reach for her medication list and the potassium result while the nurse places pads.
Key ECG findings
- Broad QRS complexes (>=120 ms), which may carry an LBBB or RBBB morphology
- Very slow ventricular rate of 20-40 bpm (idioventricular range)
- Regular escape rhythm without conducted supraventricular activity driving the QRS
- Often seen with sinus arrest/pause or with complete (3rd degree) AV block, where P waves march independently
Pearls
- This is an escape, not the primary problem β it emerges only when the faster pacemakers above (SA node 60-100, atria <60, AV node 40-60) fail or are blocked. Treat the cause of the failure, and do not suppress the escape.
- The bundle morphology localizes the origin: a dominant S in V1 (LBBB pattern) points to an escape arising from the right bundle, while a dominant R in V1 (RBBB pattern) points to the left bundle system.
- Reach for the reversible drivers named in the source β hyperkalemia and beta-blocker, calcium-channel-blocker, or digoxin toxicity β because those change management immediately.
Pitfalls
- Do not treat a slow broad-complex rhythm with an AV-nodal blocker or antiarrhythmic that suppresses the escape β you can abolish the only remaining pacemaker and cause asystole.
- Rates as low as ~15 bpm occur; an extremely slow escape may be mistaken for a dying or agonal tracing when it actually reflects complete heart block needing pacing.
- Missing the underlying etiology β hyperkalemia, sinus arrest, high-grade or complete AV block, or drug poisoning β means treating the rate while the real problem progresses.
At the Bedside
Support the patient and treat the cause: check potassium and the medication list for AV-nodal blockers or digoxin, and provide chronotropic support (atropine, then transcutaneous/transvenous pacing) for high-grade or complete AV block β while never giving a drug that would suppress the escape rhythm.
LITFL ECG Library β Ventricular Escape Rhythm · reviewed 2026-07-06
Accelerated Junctional Rhythm A narrow-complex rhythm at 60-100 with retrograde or absent P waves is an AV junctional pacemaker outrunning the sinus node β think digoxin.
A 74-year-old woman on digoxin for atrial fibrillation is brought in feeling nauseated and 'off,' with some blurred vision. She is stable, and the monitor shows a regular narrow-complex rhythm at about 80. On the 12-lead the QRS complexes are narrow, but the P waves are strange: inverted in the inferior leads II, III, and aVF and upright in aVR and V1, and they sit oddly close to the QRS β appearing just before some complexes, buried in others. In places the atria and ventricles seem to march independently. The rate is too fast for a normal junctional escape yet not a tachycardia, and vagal pressure barely nudges it.
Key ECG findings
- Narrow-complex rhythm with QRS under 120 ms (unless pre-existing bundle branch block or rate-related aberrancy)
- Ventricular rate usually 60-100 bpm β faster than a junctional escape (40-60) but not a junctional tachycardia (>100)
- Retrograde P waves that may fall before, during, or after the QRS; inverted in the inferior leads, upright in aVR and V1
- AV dissociation may be present, with the ventricular rate typically exceeding the atrial rate
- There may be associated ECG features of digoxin effect or toxicity
Pearls
- AJR arises when the junctional pacemaker's rate exceeds the sinus node's β increased AV nodal automaticity paired with decreased sinus automaticity, so it often signals something suppressing the sinus node.
- Digoxin toxicity is the classic cause; other drivers include beta-agonists (isoprenaline, adrenaline), myocardial ischemia, myocarditis, and cardiac surgery.
- Because it is an automatic rhythm, it typically does not respond to vagal maneuvers with reversion β you may see transient slowing but not conversion to sinus, which itself helps separate it from re-entrant SVT.
Pitfalls
- A rapid AJR can be hard to distinguish from re-entrant junctional tachycardias like AVNRT or AVRT; irregularity and heart-rate variability favor an automatic junctional rhythm.
- AJR with aberrant conduction can mimic accelerated idioventricular rhythm β fusion or capture beats indicate a ventricular rather than junctional focus.
- Anchoring on the 'benign' rate can cause you to miss the underlying driver; in a patient on digoxin, treat the rhythm as a clue to toxicity rather than an isolated finding.
At the Bedside
Recognition redirects you to the cause rather than to rate control: in a digoxin-treated patient, evaluate for toxicity, and otherwise look for ischemia, myocarditis, sympathomimetics, or recent cardiac surgery, since the rhythm itself is usually a marker rather than the primary target.
LITFL ECG Library β Accelerated Junctional Rhythm (AJR) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Ashman Phenomenon A single wide RBBB-shaped beat after a long-then-short cycle in atrial fibrillation is aberrancy, not ectopy.
A 74-year-old woman in known atrial fibrillation is on the monitor for palpitations. The rhythm is irregularly irregular, as expected. During one stretch a relatively long R-R interval is followed by a noticeably short one, and the beat that closes that short cycle comes out wide, with a right-bundle morphology β a tall secondary R in V1. The very next beats are narrow again. There is no fully compensatory pause around the wide complex, and the initial vector of that broad QRS looks the same as the surrounding conducted beats. She is asymptomatic and hemodynamically well throughout.
Key ECG findings
- Aberrantly conducted beat, usually of RBBB morphology, following a short R-R interval that was itself preceded by a relatively long R-R interval
- Most often seen in atrial fibrillation, but can occur with other supraventricular arrhythmias
- RBBB-form aberrancy with a normal orientation of the initial QRS vector
- A short-long-short R-R sequence is especially likely to trigger it
- Lack of a fully compensatory pause; irregular coupling of the aberrant complexes
Pearls
- The mechanism explains the whole pattern: His-Purkinje refractoriness tracks the preceding R-R, so a long cycle lengthens the next refractory period, and a premature beat arriving into that refractoriness conducts aberrantly.
- It favors RBBB morphology because the right bundle's refractory period is slightly longer than the left's β a useful tell that a wide beat is aberrant.
- On its own it is asymptomatic and needs no specific treatment; recognizing it prevents an unnecessary cascade.
Pitfalls
- The core trap is calling it a PVC or a run of VT and treating ventricular ectopy that isn't there.
- A normal initial QRS vector (matching conducted beats) and absence of a fully compensatory pause argue for aberrancy over ventricular origin β miss these and you overcall ectopy.
- Consecutive aberrant beats are possible, so a short 'wide-complex' series in AF can still be Ashman aberrancy rather than VT.
At the Bedside
Recognizing Ashman aberrancy in atrial fibrillation lets you withhold antiarrhythmics or defibrillation aimed at ventricular ectopy and instead keep managing the underlying AF β sparing the patient an unnecessary and potentially harmful intervention.
LITFL ECG Library β Ashman Phenomenon · reviewed 2026-07-06
Fusion Beats A single hybrid complex, intermediate between the patient's narrow and wide beats, proves two pacemakers are firing at once β and helps nail a wide tachycardia as VT.
A 66-year-old man is being monitored during a run of regular wide-complex tachycardia. Scanning the strip, most of the beats are broad and uniform, but one complex stands out: it is neither as narrow as his baseline conducted beats nor as wide as the surrounding ectopics, sitting midway in both width and shape. A couple of beats nearby look fully narrow and normally conducted, as if the supraventricular impulse briefly won out. That single in-between complex is the clue β a supraventricular and a ventricular impulse have collided to stamp out one blended morphology on the tracing.
Key ECG findings
- A hybrid QRS of intermediate width and morphology between the supraventricular and the ventricular complexes
- Indicates two pacemaker foci firing simultaneously β a supraventricular pacemaker (e.g. sinus node) and a competing ventricular focus
- Often seen alongside capture beats (fully conducted narrow beats) in the same strip
- Occurs in the setting of ventricular tachycardia and accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR)
Pearls
- A fusion beat is physical proof of AV dissociation β a supraventricular and a ventricular impulse depolarized the ventricle together β which is why it helps confirm VT over SVT with aberrancy.
- Look for fusion and capture beats together: capture beats are fully conducted narrow complexes, fusion beats are the intermediate blends, and both mark a competing ventricular focus.
- Fusion beats aren't inherently dangerous themselves; their value is diagnostic, telling you which rhythm you're actually dealing with. (Dressler first described the beat in 1952.)
Pitfalls
- Mistaking a fusion or capture beat for an artifact or an isolated ectopic, and missing the AV-dissociation clue that points to VT.
- Assuming a fusion beat always means VT β it also appears in the benign AIVR, so interpret it against rate and clinical context.
- Expecting fusion beats to be present in every VT; their absence does not exclude VT, it just removes one confirmatory clue.
At the Bedside
Use a fusion beat as confirmatory evidence when classifying a wide-complex tachycardia: it supports a ventricular origin and pushes you toward treating the rhythm as VT rather than SVT with aberrancy. Weigh it with the rate β the same finding in a slow, well-tolerated rhythm points to AIVR instead.
LITFL ECG Library β Fusion Beats · reviewed 2026-07-06
Premature Ventricular Complex (PVC) A broad, early, bizarre beat with discordant ST-T changes and a full compensatory pause is usually benign β unless it lands on a T wave in a long QT.
A 52-year-old presents with palpitations and a sensation of the heart 'skipping.' The underlying rhythm is sinus and regular. Interrupting it, early and unexpected, is a wide QRS complex of at least 120 milliseconds with a bizarre morphology unlike the sinus beats. Its ST segment and T wave point in the opposite direction to the main QRS deflection. There is no preceding P wave, and after the odd beat comes a pause β the next sinus beat arrives at an interval equal to double the normal R-R. Scanning the strip, a second early beat appears with a different shape from the first.
Key ECG findings
- Broad QRS complex (β₯ 120 ms) with abnormal morphology, occurring earlier than the next expected sinus beat
- Discordant ST-segment and T-wave changes (appropriate discordance) β opposite in direction to the main QRS vector
- Usually followed by a full compensatory pause: the next normal beat arrives after an interval equal to double the preceding R-R
- Morphology localizes origin: LBBB morphology (dominant S in V1) = right ventricle; RBBB morphology (dominant R in V1) = left ventricle
- Patterns: bigeminy, trigeminy, quadrigeminy, couplets, and multifocal PVCs (multiple morphologies from multiple foci)
Pearls
- PVCs are a normal electrophysiological phenomenon that usually need no investigation or treatment β the presence of ectopy alone is not a disease.
- The danger is context: with a prolonged QTc, a PVC landing on the T wave ('R on T') can trigger Torsades de Pointes, so the QT interval is the interval that matters most.
- Multifocal PVCs (varying morphologies) imply more than one irritable focus and, unlike unifocal ectopy, should prompt you to look for an underlying cause such as ischemia or electrolyte derangement.
Pitfalls
- Three or more consecutive PVCs at > 100 bpm is non-sustained VT, not just 'a run of ectopy' β labeling matters for risk stratification.
- In patients with ischemic heart disease or WPW, a PVC can be the trigger that launches a re-entrant tachycardia (VT, AVNRT, AVRT); don't dismiss ectopy in the wrong substrate.
- Look for reversible drivers before reassuring β hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, digoxin toxicity, sympathomimetics, and myocardial ischemia all provoke frequent PVCs.
At the Bedside
For isolated PVCs in a well patient, reassure and avoid unnecessary treatment. When PVCs are frequent, multifocal, or occur as couplets/NSVT, check a potassium and magnesium and an ECG for QT prolongation and ischemia β correcting electrolytes and treating the substrate is the intervention. Escalate monitoring for R-on-T ectopy in a long QT because of the Torsades risk.
LITFL ECG Library β Premature Ventricular Complex (PVC) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Sinoatrial Exit Block Dropped P waves where the pause is an exact multiple of the underlying P-P interval mark sinus impulses that fire but fail to leave the SA node.
A 68-year-old woman on a beta blocker presents feeling intermittently 'skippy.' She is stable, with a pulse in the 60s. Her rhythm strip shows a run of normal sinus beats, then an abrupt gap where an entire P-QRS-T is missing, then the rhythm resuming on schedule. When you caliper it, the P waves before and after are otherwise regular, and the pause bracketing the absent P wave measures almost exactly twice the surrounding P-P interval. On a second strip you see a different pattern: the P-P intervals gradually shorten into a cluster before a P wave drops, giving the beats a grouped appearance.
Key ECG findings
- Intermittent dropped P waves from failure of sinus impulses to propagate out of the SA node, while the node itself keeps depolarizing
- Type II second-degree SA block: dropped P waves with a constant conduction interval and no clustering; the pause around the dropped P wave is an exact multiple of the preceding P-P interval
- Type I (Wenckebach) SA block: progressive shortening of the P-P interval before a dropped P wave, producing grouped beating
- Only second-degree SA block (types I and II) can be diagnosed from the 12-lead ECG
- Junctional escape beats may appear during the pauses
Pearls
- The 'exact multiple' rule is the workhorse: in type II SA block the pause equals a whole-number multiple of the baseline P-P (the source cites a 2.1-second pause that is exactly double a 1.05-second P-P), because the sinus keeps timing even when an impulse fails to exit.
- The conduction patterns mirror AV block, but since the sinus impulse itself is invisible you infer it from the P waves alone β analogous to reading only the R waves in AV block.
- Third-degree SA block is indistinguishable on the surface ECG from sinus arrest due to pacemaker-cell failure; separating them requires a sinus node electrode during EP study.
Pitfalls
- Type I SA block's gradually shortening P-P and grouped beating is easily mistaken for sinus arrhythmia β measure the intervals rather than eyeballing.
- Look for reversible drivers before labeling intrinsic node disease: increased vagal tone (athletes, pain, surgery), inferior MI, myocarditis, and rate-slowing drugs (digoxin, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, amiodarone).
- The onset of third-degree SA block can produce long sinus pauses or arrest and may lead to fatal asystole if a junctional escape does not take over β do not dismiss high-grade block as benign.
At the Bedside
Confirm the block by caliper (multiple-of-P-P pause for type II, grouped shortening for type I), then hunt for and reverse the cause β stop or reduce AV/sinus-slowing drugs, treat vagal triggers, and consider inferior MI. Symptomatic or high-grade block with inadequate escape warrants monitoring and a pacing evaluation, often in the context of sick sinus syndrome.
LITFL ECG Library β Sinoatrial Exit Block · reviewed 2026-07-06
Normal Sinus Rhythm The default rhythm: a regular narrow-complex rhythm at 60-100 bpm with a normal P wave before every QRS and a constant PR.
A healthy 18-year-old man presents for a pre-participation sports evaluation with no complaints. Vitals are normal. His 12-lead shows a regular rhythm at 84 bpm. Each QRS is narrow, under 100 ms, and is preceded by a P wave that is upright in leads I and II and inverted in aVR. The PR interval is constant from beat to beat, and every P wave is followed by a QRS. The complexes are of normal amplitude with no ST or T wave abnormality. Nothing on the tracing departs from what you would expect in a well young adult.
Key ECG findings
- Regular rhythm at a rate of 60-100 bpm (or age-appropriate rate in children)
- Each QRS complex preceded by a normal P wave
- Normal P wave axis: upright in leads I and II, inverted in aVR
- Constant PR interval
- QRS complexes <100 ms wide (unless a co-existent interventricular conduction delay is present)
Pearls
- The P wave axis is the quiet workhorse: upright in I and II and inverted in aVR confirms the impulse is coming from the sino-atrial node, not an ectopic or junctional focus.
- Rate alone doesn't unseat sinus rhythm β sinus tachycardia (>100) and sinus bradycardia (<60) are still sinus, defined by the same normal P wave and constant PR.
- Beat-to-beat variation in the P-P interval with otherwise normal sinus P waves is sinus arrhythmia, a normal variant, not a pathologic irregularity.
Pitfalls
- Assuming any narrow, regular, appropriately-rated rhythm is sinus without confirming a normal P wave precedes each QRS β junctional and ectopic atrial rhythms can masquerade.
- Using child rates against adult thresholds β normal newborn rates run 110-150 bpm, so 'tachycardia' must be judged against the age-appropriate range.
- Forgetting that a QRS can exceed 100 ms and still sit on sinus rhythm when there is a co-existent interventricular conduction delay.
At the Bedside
Confirming normal sinus rhythm establishes the baseline against which every abnormality is judged β it reassures you the conduction pathway from SA node through AV node and His-Purkinje is intact and directs attention to the clinical question rather than the rhythm.
LITFL ECG Library β Normal Sinus Rhythm · reviewed 2026-07-06
Sinus Arrhythmia A cyclical, breathing-linked variation in the P-P interval with normal, constant P waves is a benign vagal phenomenon of the young β not a pathologic arrhythmia.
A healthy 19-year-old has an ECG done before minor elective surgery. The rhythm looks irregular at a glance, and the automated read flags an 'irregular ventricular rate.' On inspection every P wave is a normal sinus P wave, upright in I and II, with identical morphology beat to beat. Each P wave is followed by a QRS at a constant PR interval. What varies is the spacing between beats: the P-P interval lengthens and shortens smoothly and cyclically, speeding up and slowing down in a rhythmic way that seems to track the patient's breathing. There are no premature P waves and no dropped beats.
Key ECG findings
- Variation in the P-P interval of more than 120 ms (3 small boxes), producing an irregular ventricular rate
- The P-P interval gradually lengthens and shortens in a cyclical fashion, usually corresponding to the respiratory cycle
- Normal sinus P waves with constant morphology β no premature atrial contractions
- Constant P-R interval β no evidence of Mobitz I AV block
- Rate is best estimated for such irregular rhythms by multiplying the total complexes in the rhythm strip by 6
Pearls
- Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a normal physiological phenomenon most common in young, healthy people β heart rate rises on inspiration (falling vagal tone) and falls on expiration.
- Its incidence decreases with age as carotid distensibility and baroreceptor sensitivity decline, so pronounced respiratory variation in a young patient is reassuring, not alarming.
- The two anchors that make it benign are constant P-wave morphology and a fixed PR interval β if both hold, the irregularity is vagal, not conduction disease.
Pitfalls
- Don't mistake it for a pathologic irregular rhythm: frequent premature atrial contractions, Mobitz I (Wenckebach) AV block, and Type I sinoatrial exit block all cause sinus rhythm with an irregular ventricular rate.
- 'Non-respiratory' sinus arrhythmia, not linked to breathing, typically occurs in the elderly and is more likely pathologic β from heart disease or digoxin toxicity.
- A changing P-wave morphology or a varying PR interval takes you out of simple sinus arrhythmia and toward ectopy or AV block β check those before dismissing the irregularity.
At the Bedside
Recognizing respiratory sinus arrhythmia lets you reassure the patient and avoid an unnecessary workup or antiarrhythmic β no treatment is needed for the benign respiratory form in a young, healthy person. Reserve further evaluation for the non-respiratory pattern in an older patient, where you should consider structural heart disease or digoxin toxicity.
LITFL ECG Library β Sinus Arrhythmia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Conduction (11)
AV Block β Mobitz II Intermittent dropped QRS complexes without progressive PR prolongation imply infranodal disease and a high risk of complete heart block.
A 76-year-old patient with dizziness has an ECG showing regular sinus P waves at 75 bpm. Most P waves conduct with a constant PR interval, but every third P wave is suddenly not followed by a QRS complex. The conducted QRS complexes are wide with a right bundle branch block morphology. There is no progressive PR lengthening before the dropped beat.
Key ECG findings
- Constant PR intervals in conducted beats before and after a non-conducted P wave
- Intermittent dropped QRS complexes without preceding PR prolongation
- Often associated with a wide QRS because the block is commonly infranodal
- May appear as 2:1 AV block where Mobitz I vs II cannot be proven from PR behavior alone
- Can progress abruptly to complete heart block
Pearls
- Mobitz II is a pacemaker rhythm, even if the patient looks okay in the moment.
- A wide QRS with dropped beats should raise suspicion for infranodal disease.
- When the rhythm is 2:1 AV block, you often cannot definitively classify Mobitz I vs II; risk-stratify based on QRS width, symptoms, and clinical context.
Pitfalls
- Do not reassure yourself because the ventricular rate is currently acceptable; progression can be sudden.
- Do not confuse blocked PACs with Mobitz II. Look for premature, abnormal P waves deforming the preceding T wave.
- Atropine may not work well for infranodal block and can occasionally worsen conduction patterns.
At the Bedside
Place pacing pads, monitor continuously, evaluate reversible causes, and admit with cardiology involvement. If unstable, pace and support perfusion rather than waiting for progression.
LITFL ECG Library β Mobitz II · reviewed 2026-05-11
AV Block β Third Degree / Complete Heart Block Complete AV dissociation with an escape rhythm is a pacing problem until proven otherwise.
An 82-year-old man presents with weakness and near-syncope. The ECG shows P waves marching through at 80 bpm while the QRS complexes appear independently at 32 bpm. The PR intervals vary randomly because the atria and ventricles are not communicating. His blood pressure is 84/48 and he looks gray.
Key ECG findings
- AV dissociation: atrial rate faster than ventricular rate with no consistent PR relationship
- Regular P-P intervals and usually regular R-R intervals, but no fixed PR interval
- Narrow escape rhythm suggests junctional escape; wide escape rhythm suggests ventricular escape and is less reliable
- Can occur with inferior MI, anterior MI, degenerative conduction disease, hyperkalemia, medication toxicity, or post-procedure conduction injury
- May be intermittent; capture a 12-lead and rhythm strip when symptoms occur
Pearls
- Look for AV dissociation before calling it high-grade block. P waves hidden in T waves are the common miss.
- Wide escape rhythm and hypotension should make you move quickly toward pacing.
- Reversible causes matter, especially inferior MI, hyperkalemia, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and digoxin.
Pitfalls
- Atropine may fail in infranodal complete heart block. Do not let repeated atropine attempts delay pacing in an unstable patient.
- Transcutaneous pacing is a bridge, not definitive therapy; call cardiology early for transvenous pacing or permanent pacemaker planning.
- Complete heart block can masquerade as a slow regular ventricular rhythm if you do not search for P waves.
At the Bedside
If unstable, start ACLS bradycardia management: pads on, atropine if appropriate, transcutaneous pacing, pressor infusion, and cardiology for transvenous pacing. Treat reversible causes in parallel.
LITFL ECG Library β Complete Heart Block / 3rd Degree AV Block · reviewed 2026-05-11
Bifascicular Block RBBB plus a fascicular block in a patient with chest pain can be the only sign of proximal LAD occlusion β even with no ST elevation.
A 66-year-old man presents with an hour of central chest pressure and diaphoresis. He is pale but hemodynamically stable. The ECG shows a broad QRS with an RSR' pattern in V1 through V3 and slurred S waves in the lateral leads β a right bundle branch block. Layered on top, the frontal axis is markedly leftward, with a dominant negative deflection inferiorly. Looking closer at the precordium there are concordant ST-segment changes best seen in V2 and the inferior T waves look fuller and more peaked than they should. No lead meets a millimeter threshold for classic ST elevation. The pain persists as the tracing prints.
Key ECG findings
- RBBB (broad QRS with RSR' in V1-V2, slurred S waves in lateral leads) combined with a fascicular block
- RBBB + left anterior fascicular block, seen as left axis deviation β the most common pattern, due to the single LAD blood supply to the anterior fascicle
- RBBB + left posterior fascicular block, seen as right axis deviation β less common (dual blood supply) and associated with more extensive underlying pathology
- Conduction to the ventricles depends on the single remaining fascicle
- In the setting of chest pain, concordant ST changes or hyperacute T waves may be the only overt signs of acute occlusion
Pearls
- New bifascicular block during chest pain is highly associated with proximal LAD occlusion even without ST elevation β in about 30% of cases there is no ST elevation and the bifascicular block is the only acute finding.
- Bifascicular block signals structural heart disease and extensive conducting-system fibrosis in 50-80% of patients; it is rarely an isolated wiring quirk.
- Risk stratify by symptoms: overall progression to complete heart block is only 1-4% per year (~1% in the asymptomatic), but a patient who presents with syncope carries a 17% annual risk.
Pitfalls
- Before labeling RBBB with right axis deviation as bifascicular block, exclude other causes of RAD such as right ventricular hypertrophy.
- Masquerading bundle branch block β a mixed complete RBBB and LBBB pattern β mimics ordinary bifascicular block but reflects worse fibrosis and higher progression to complete heart block.
- Hyperkalemia can produce a bifascicular pattern that resolves with treatment; don't miss a reversible metabolic cause.
At the Bedside
Treat new bifascicular block in a chest-pain patient as an acute coronary occlusion equivalent β activate the ACS pathway and discuss emergent catheterization even without ST elevation. Any patient with bifascicular block plus syncope or presyncope is admitted for monitoring; if the syncope workup is otherwise unrevealing, pacemaker insertion is recommended.
LITFL ECG Library β Bifascicular Block · reviewed 2026-07-06
First-Degree AV Block A uniformly long PR interval with every P conducting is delay, not interruption β usually benign, but a flag to look for its cause.
A 60-year-old man with well-controlled hypertension comes in after a minor fall and gets a routine ECG. He is asymptomatic, hemodynamically normal, and the tracing is otherwise unremarkable. Every P wave is followed by a QRS, and the rate and rhythm are regular β but the PR interval is strikingly long, well beyond five small squares, and constant from beat to beat. On careful inspection some of the P waves are almost lost in the upstroke of the preceding T wave. There is no dropped beat and no progressive lengthening; the conduction delay is fixed across the entire strip.
Key ECG findings
- PR interval > 200 ms (more than one large square / five small squares)
- Delay without interruption β every P wave conducts to a QRS, with no dropped beats
- PR interval is fixed, not progressively lengthening (distinguishing it from Mobitz I)
- 'Marked' first-degree block when PR > 300 ms β P waves may be buried in the preceding T wave
Pearls
- As an isolated finding this is benign, causes no hemodynamic instability, and needs no specific treatment β the value is using it as a prompt to look for a reversible cause.
- Run the cause list at the bedside: high vagal tone or athletic conditioning, inferior MI, myocarditis (including Lyme), electrolyte disturbance such as hyperkalemia, and AV-nodal blocking drugs (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, amiodarone).
- In marked block the P can hide inside the prior T wave β count intervals carefully so you don't misread it as a junctional rhythm or a dropped beat.
Pitfalls
- Do not treat isolated first-degree block itself; the trap is over-reacting to a benign finding while missing the medication or electrolyte driving it.
- In the right clinical context (inferior MI, Lyme myocarditis) a lengthening PR is a warning that higher-grade block may follow β don't file it as purely benign without watching.
- Mistaking fixed PR prolongation for Wenckebach: the defining feature here is that the PR does not change and no beats drop.
At the Bedside
Confirm every P conducts, then shift attention to the cause: review rate-controlling drugs, check potassium, and consider ischemia. In isolation, reassure and disposition normally; escalate monitoring only if it accompanies acute MI or higher-grade block.
LITFL ECG Library β First Degree Heart Block · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Bundle Branch Block A broad QRS with a dominant S wave in V1 and a broad monophasic R wave laterally is LBBB β and knowing what discordance is allowable is what lets you spot the infarct hiding inside it.
A 70-year-old woman with hypertension and aortic stenosis presents with chest pressure. Her vitals are stable. The 12-lead shows a wide QRS, clearly beyond 120 ms. In V1 there is a deep, dominant S wave with only a tiny initial R wave; in leads I, aVL, and V5-V6 there is a broad, notched, M-shaped R wave with no preceding Q waves. R-wave progression across the precordium is poor and the axis is leftward. In the lateral leads with the tall R waves you see some ST depression and T-wave inversion, while the right precordial leads with deep S waves carry a modest amount of ST elevation. You study the proportions of those ST shifts against the QRS.
Key ECG findings
- QRS duration >=120 ms with a dominant S wave in V1 (rS or QS complex)
- Broad, monophasic, often M-shaped/notched R wave in the lateral leads (I, aVL, V5-V6) with absence of Q waves there
- Prolonged R-wave peak time >60 ms in V5-V6
- Left axis deviation and poor R-wave progression across the precordium
- Appropriate discordance β ST segment and T wave point opposite to the main QRS deflection
Pearls
- Appropriate discordance is the rule: leads with deep S waves may show ST elevation that is allowable up to roughly 25% of the S-wave depth without meaning ischemia. Judge the ST shift as a proportion of the QRS, not in absolute millimeters.
- LBBB rarely exists without underlying organic disease β aortic stenosis, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, dilated cardiomyopathy, and Lenegre-Lev degeneration are among the drivers, so its presence flags a diseased heart.
- New LBBB with chest pain is no longer an automatic STEMI-equivalent; modern practice is to hunt for excessive discordance or concordant ST change rather than reflexively activating on the block alone.
Pitfalls
- Any concordant ST change β ST shift in the same direction as the main QRS deflection β is concerning for ischemia and should not be dismissed as part of the block (apply Sgarbossa reasoning).
- Right ventricular paced rhythms produce a nearly identical LBBB-like morphology; look for pacing spikes to tell them apart.
- LVH can mimic LBBB with QRS widening and lateral ST depression / T-wave inversion β don't over-call a bundle branch block on voltage and repolarization changes alone.
At the Bedside
In a chest-pain patient with LBBB, don't stop at the block β measure ST shifts against QRS proportions and apply Sgarbossa/excessive-discordance criteria; concordant ST change or excessive discordance drives emergent cath lab activation, while an old LBBB with only appropriate discordance directs you to serial troponins and an alternative workup.
LITFL ECG Library β Left Bundle Branch Block · reviewed 2026-07-06
Right Bundle Branch Block A wide QRS with an RSR' in V1 and slurred lateral S waves is RBBB β but a new one during chest pain is a red flag.
A 62-year-old man with risk factors presents with an hour of central chest pain. He is diaphoretic, and the pain is ongoing. The QRS is broad, beyond 120 ms. Lead V1 shows an M-shaped RSR' with a tall, broad secondary R wave, and leads I and V6 carry wide, slurred terminal S waves. The right precordial leads show some ST and T-wave change, but in V2 the ST shift looks concordant rather than discordant, and the inferior T waves are tall and bulky. A prior ECG on file, the nurse notes, had a normal QRS width. The pain has not eased.
Key ECG findings
- QRS duration > 120 ms
- RSR' ('M-shaped') pattern in V1β3, sometimes a broad monophasic R or qR in V1
- Wide, slurred S wave in the lateral leads (I, aVL, V5β6)
- Appropriate discordance: ST depression and/or T-wave inversion in the right precordial leads V1β3
- Normal cardiac axis in isolated RBBB, since left ventricular activation is normal
Pearls
- In a patient with chest pain, a new RBBB is highly concerning for occlusion MI and a potential indication for immediate reperfusion β the right bundle is supplied by LAD perforators in most people, so new RBBB (with or without LAFB) can mean proximal LAD occlusion.
- Learn what 'appropriate' discordance looks like (repolarization opposite the terminal QRS in V1β3); departures from it β concordant ST change, hyperacute T waves β are the ischemic tells, as in the case with a 99% proximal LAD lesion.
- Incomplete RBBB (RSR' in V1β3 with QRS < 120 ms) is a normal variant, common in children, and carries no clinical significance.
Pitfalls
- An RSR' in V1β3 can be Brugada syndrome rather than RBBB β a pattern tied to malignant ventricular arrhythmias, not a benign conduction finding.
- Anchoring on 'known RBBB' can bury acute ischemia: compare with an old ECG, because newness is what matters, and look past the expected discordance for concordant change and hyperacute T waves.
- Do not assume isolated RBBB shifts the axis β axis deviation implies an added fascicular block (e.g. LAFB), i.e. bifascicular disease.
At the Bedside
Treat isolated, chronic RBBB as incidental β but a new RBBB with ongoing chest pain should be handled as a possible occlusion MI: activate the reperfusion pathway and get cardiology involved rather than waiting for classic STEMI criteria. Always compare with a prior tracing.
LITFL ECG Library β Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Interventricular Conduction Delay A wide QRS that fits neither LBBB nor RBBB should make you think metabolic or toxic, not simple bundle disease.
A 55-year-old man is brought in obtunded after a suspected overdose. He is hypotensive and poorly responsive. The ECG shows a broad QRS β clearly beyond 100 ms β but the morphology fits no clean template: there is no RSR' in V1 to call it a right bundle block, and no dominant broad S in V1 with a notched R in V6 to call it a left bundle block. The complex is just widened and bizarre across the precordium. The rate is a touch fast and the terminal forces look prolonged. Nothing about the QRS conforms to a typical bundle-branch pattern.
Key ECG findings
- QRS duration > 100 ms
- Widening not attributable to left bundle branch block or right bundle branch block morphology
- Absence of the defining RBBB pattern (RSR'/'M' in V1 with slurred S in V6)
- Absence of the defining LBBB pattern (dominant S in V1, broad notched R in V6)
Pearls
- A nonspecific wide QRS is a clue, not a diagnosis: the most important causes to reach for are hyperkalemia and tricyclic antidepressant poisoning.
- Because these causes are reversible and lethal, a QRS that won't fit a bundle-branch template should trigger an immediate metabolic and toxicologic workup rather than a label of 'IVCD, chronic.'
- It sits within the broader conduction-block family β distinguishing it from fascicular and bundle blocks is largely about excluding their specific morphologies.
Pitfalls
- Filing a broad QRS as a benign nonspecific delay and missing rising potassium or sodium-channel blockade.
- Forcing the tracing into an LBBB or RBBB bin when it meets neither set of criteria, obscuring the true metabolic/toxic cause.
- Assuming 'wide QRS' automatically means intrinsic conducting-system disease when the driver may be a treatable poisoning or electrolyte derangement.
At the Bedside
Treat the wide, non-conforming QRS as potential hyperkalemia or sodium-channel-blocker toxicity: check a potassium immediately and, in the right context, give IV calcium and sodium bicarbonate empirically while confirming the cause, rather than attributing it to fixed bundle disease.
LITFL ECG Library β Conduction Blocks · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB) Marked left axis deviation with qR in I/aVL and rS inferiorly, and a QRS that's barely widened, is left anterior fascicular block.
A 68-year-old man presents for evaluation of exertional chest discomfort. He is hemodynamically stable and the rhythm is regular sinus. On the 12-lead the frontal axis is markedly leftward, between -45 and -90 degrees. Leads I and aVL show qR complexes with small Q waves and tall R waves, while the inferior leads II, III and aVF show rS complexes with small R waves and deep S waves. The QRS duration is only slightly prolonged, around 100 ms. The R wave in aVL peaks late, its onset-to-peak time exceeding 45 ms, and the limb-lead voltages look generous. There is no ST-segment strain pattern in the lateral leads.
Key ECG findings
- Left axis deviation, usually -45 to -90 degrees
- qR complexes in leads I and aVL
- rS complexes in leads II, III and aVF
- Prolonged R wave peak time in aVL >45 ms
- QRS duration normal or only slightly prolonged (80-110 ms)
- Increased QRS voltage in the limb leads
Pearls
- The mechanism explains the morphology: conduction reaches the LV only via the posterior fascicle, so the initial vector goes down-and-right (small R inferiorly, small Q laterally) before the delayed main vector swings up-and-left (tall lateral R, deep inferior S).
- The block adds only about 20 ms of delay, which is why the QRS widens just slightly rather than becoming a full bundle branch block.
- The late-peaking R wave in aVL (>45 ms peak time) is the hallmark of that delayed leftward conduction β a useful confirmatory sign when the axis alone is ambiguous.
Pitfalls
- In LAFB, aVL can meet LVH voltage criteria (R >11 mm) without true LVH β the giveaway is the absence of an accompanying LV strain pattern.
- Attributing the marked left axis deviation to other causes (inferior MI, LVH) without recognizing the qR-lateral / rS-inferior fascicular signature.
- Overcalling the small inferior R waves or lateral Q waves as pathological infarction Q waves.
At the Bedside
Recognize LAFB as a conduction pattern, not ischemia β don't let its axis shift or pseudo-LVH voltages trigger a false MI or hypertrophy workup; note it as a fascicular block and interpret coexisting findings (e.g., RBBB for bifascicular block) in that light.
LITFL ECG Library β Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Posterior Fascicular Block Right axis deviation with rS in I/aVL and qR in the inferior leads is LPFB β but only after you have excluded the dangerous causes of right axis it mimics.
A 70-year-old man presents with dyspnea. His ECG shows a markedly rightward frontal axis: leads I and aVL are dominantly negative while II, III, and aVF are dominantly positive. Looking at the morphology, leads I and aVL show rS complexes with small R waves and deep S waves, and the inferior leads show qR complexes with small Q waves and tall R waves. The QRS is only slightly widened, and the R-wave peak time in aVF looks prolonged. There is no chest wall deformity, and you have no prior tracing to compare against as you work through why his axis has swung so far right.
Key ECG findings
- Right axis deviation (> +90 degrees)
- rS complexes in leads I and aVL (small R, deep S)
- qR complexes in leads II, III and aVF (small Q, tall R)
- Prolonged R-wave peak time in aVF (> 45 ms)
- QRS duration normal or only slightly prolonged (80-110 ms)
Pearls
- LPFB is a diagnosis of exclusion: you can only call it after ruling out right ventricular hypertrophy and every other cause of right axis deviation.
- It is much less common than LAFB because the posterior fascicle is a broad, well-protected band of fibers, while the anterior fascicle is a slim single tract more easily damaged.
- LPFB in isolation is extremely rare β it usually travels with RBBB as part of a bifascicular block, so finding it should prompt a hunt for coexisting conduction disease.
Pitfalls
- Do not diagnose LPFB before excluding acute pulmonary embolism, tricyclic overdose, lateral STEMI, and right ventricular hypertrophy β all can produce right axis deviation and some are emergencies.
- Because true isolated LPFB is so rare, a lone RAD is far more likely to be one of those mimics than a fascicular block.
- Anchoring on 'LPFB' can distract you from the real driver of a new right axis, such as an acutely strained right heart.
At the Bedside
Treat a new right axis deviation as a prompt to exclude the dangerous causes first β get a focused history and exam for PE and TCA ingestion, and scrutinize the ECG for lateral STEMI and RVH β before you settle on LPFB, and look for accompanying RBBB signaling bifascicular block.
LITFL ECG Library β Left Posterior Fascicular Block (LPFB) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Trifascicular Block True trifascicular block is bifascicular block with complete AV block β the clinically loose usage of the term is a different, lower-risk animal.
A 78-year-old man presents after a syncopal episode. He is now alert, bradycardic in the low 30s, and mildly lightheaded. The ECG shows a broad QRS with an RSR' in V1 typical of right bundle disease and a markedly leftward axis. The P waves march out at their own rate, and the QRS complexes come slower and entirely independently β there is no consistent relationship between atria and ventricles. The escape complexes carry that same right-bundle-plus-left-axis appearance. Across the strip the atria and ventricles beat on separate clocks.
Key ECG findings
- True trifascicular block = conduction delay in all three fascicles: one of two patterns β 3rd-degree AV block + RBBB + LAFB, or 3rd-degree AV block + RBBB + LPFB
- Ventricular escape arises distal to the block (left anterior or posterior fascicle), giving RBBB-plus-fascicular-block-shaped QRS complexes
- Impending forms: alternating LBBB/RBBB in sinus rhythm, or RBBB with beat-to-beat alternating fascicular blocks
- The common clinical (mis)usage: bifascicular block plus 1st-degree or 2nd-degree AV block
Pearls
- Separate the two meanings: 'true' trifascicular block carries actual 3rd-degree AV block and needs a pacemaker, whereas the everyday label β bifascicular block with a long PR β usually reflects AV-nodal delay, not disease of the third fascicle.
- The AHA/ACCF/HRS recommends against the term 'trifascicular block' because it has no unique anatomical correlate β so decide management on the actual components (bifascicular block, degree of AV block, symptoms), not the label.
- Alternating bundle branch block or RBBB with alternating fascicular blocks is an ominous herald of impending complete failure of all three fascicles.
Pitfalls
- Equating the loose 'incomplete trifascicular block' (bifascicular + 1st-degree AVB) with genuine three-fascicle failure β their risk of progression to complete heart block differs greatly.
- Asymptomatic bifascicular block with first-degree AV block is not an indication for pacing (class III) β pacing it reflexively is a mistake.
- Missing a reversible driver: hyperkalemia (resolves with treatment) and digoxin toxicity can mimic or cause the picture.
At the Bedside
Sort by the real components. True trifascicular block (with 3rd-degree AV block) needs pacemaker insertion; bifascicular block with syncope or presyncope warrants admission, monitoring, and likely pacing (class II); asymptomatic bifascicular block with first-degree AV block does not. Exclude and treat hyperkalemia and digoxin toxicity first.
LITFL ECG Library β Trifascicular Block · reviewed 2026-07-06
Masquerading Bundle Branch Block RBBB in the precordial leads with an LBBB-like limb-lead pattern and vanishing S waves in I signals severe, diffuse conducting-system disease.
A 71-year-old man with a known ventricular aneurysm and heart failure presents with fatigue and near-syncope. He is stable but bradycardic. The QRS is broad. In the precordial leads V1β3 there is a clear RSR' pattern typical of right bundle disease. But look at the limb leads and the picture changes: lead I has almost no S wave at all, the axis is markedly leftward with QS complexes in II, III, and aVF, and aVL shows an M-shaped complex resembling a left bundle pattern. The two territories seem to be telling different stories on the same tracing.
Key ECG findings
- Mixed pattern: complete RBBB in the precordial leads with a complete LBBB pattern in the limb leads
- RBBB shown by the typical RSR' in V1; small or absent S wave in lead I (and often aVL)
- Standard MBBB: left axis deviation, QS complexes in II, III, aVF, and an M-shaped complex in aVL
- Precordial-type MBBB variant: RBBB in V1β3 with an LBBB pattern and absent S waves in V4β6
- Differentiated from typical bifascicular block chiefly by the absence of prominent S waves in leads I and aVL
Pearls
- Read the missing S wave in lead I as the key discriminator β typical RBBB-plus-LAFB bifascicular block keeps prominent lateral S waves; their near-absence is what unmasks masquerading block.
- It reflects more extensive fibrosis of the left bundle pathways and left ventricle than ordinary bifascicular block, hence the worse prognosis and higher risk of progressing to complete AV block.
- The numbers make the point: reported progression to complete heart block reached about 59% over four years (versus roughly 11% over five years for typical RBBB + LAFB), with high associated mortality and pacemaker rates.
Pitfalls
- Dismissing it as ordinary bifascicular block and under-appreciating the markedly higher risk of complete heart block, mortality, and need for pacing.
- Assuming an asymptomatic patient is safe β close follow-up and consideration of a permanent pacemaker are advised even without symptoms.
- Overlooking the severe underlying substrate it flags: ischemic heart disease, especially severe triple-vessel disease, plus Lenègre-Lev and Chagas disease.
At the Bedside
Recognizing MBBB changes disposition: treat it as a marker of severe, diffuse conducting-system disease with a high rate of progression to complete AV block β arrange cardiology follow-up, and pursue admission/monitoring and consideration of permanent pacemaker insertion, especially with syncope, even in an asymptomatic patient.
LITFL ECG Library β Masquerading Bundle Branch Block (MBBB) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Pre-excitation (4)
Atrial Fibrillation in Pre-excitation (WPW) An irregular, broad-complex tachycardia faster than the AV node can conduct is atrial fibrillation crossing an accessory pathway β and AV nodal blockers can kill.
A 24-year-old man is brought in with palpitations, chest tightness, and lightheadedness that began abruptly an hour ago. He is anxious, diaphoretic, and pale, with a blood pressure of 96/58. The monitor shows a wide, chaotic tachycardia. The 12-lead is a rapid, irregular, broad-complex rhythm with an overall rate around 200 and stretches touching 300 in places β far too fast to be conducted through the AV node. The QRS width shifts subtly from beat to beat, and the axis stays fixed rather than rotating. Scattered among the wide beats are a couple of narrower complexes in the right precordial leads. It looks almost like a polymorphic ventricular rhythm, but there is no twisting envelope.
Key ECG findings
- Rate greater than 200 bpm, with segments reaching up to 300 bpm β too rapid for AV nodal conduction
- Irregularly irregular rhythm with wide QRS complexes from ventricular depolarization via the accessory pathway
- Subtle beat-to-beat variation in QRS morphology and width (unlike the fixed-width QRS of true bundle branch block)
- Stable axis, unlike polymorphic VT
- Occasional narrow complexes where impulses conduct via the AV node instead of the pathway; delta waves may appear when pre-excitation is intermittent
Pearls
- The tell is a rate the AV node physically cannot produce: an irregular broad-complex tachycardia running up to 300 bpm is pre-excited AF until proven otherwise, not AF with bundle branch block.
- Beat-to-beat QRS width variation points to a pathway; a real bundle branch block gives fixed-width complexes. Use morphology, rate, and irregularity together.
- Procainamide is the most widely available medical option in the stable patient β it targets the accessory pathway and prolongs myocardial action potential duration without blocking the AV node, and is safe in children.
Pitfalls
- Adenosine, calcium channel blockers, and beta blockers can be catastrophic: blocking the AV node removes the brake on pathway conduction and can accelerate the ventricular rate into VT or VF and arrest.
- It is easily mistaken for AF with LBBB or for polymorphic VT; the absence of a twisting torsades morphology and the fixed axis argue against polymorphic VT.
- Do not be reassured by intermittent narrow or normal-looking beats β those are simply impulses that happened to travel down the AV node, and the pathway is still the danger.
At the Bedside
If the patient is unstable, go straight to urgent synchronized DC cardioversion. If stable, avoid every AV nodal blocking drug and treat with procainamide; refer for accessory pathway ablation as the definitive long-term therapy.
LITFL ECG Library β Atrial Fibrillation in Pre-excitation · reviewed 2026-07-06
Wolff-Parkinson-White Short PR plus delta wave means an accessory pathway; irregular wide-complex tachycardia in WPW is dangerous because AV nodal blockers can accelerate conduction.
A 23-year-old man presents with palpitations. His baseline ECG shows a PR interval under 120 ms, a slurred upstroke at the beginning of the QRS, and a mildly widened QRS complex. Later, he develops an irregular very rapid wide-complex rhythm with beat-to-beat QRS variation, and the monitor alarms.
Key ECG findings
- Short PR interval, typically <120 ms
- Delta wave: slurred initial QRS upstroke from ventricular pre-excitation
- Widened QRS with secondary ST-T changes
- Orthodromic AVRT is usually regular narrow-complex tachycardia; antidromic AVRT is regular wide-complex tachycardia
- Atrial fibrillation with WPW is irregular, often very rapid, wide-complex, and variable in morphology
Pearls
- The deadly ECG is irregular wide-complex tachycardia in a patient with WPW β that is pre-excited AF until proven otherwise.
- Procainamide is the classic stable medication choice for pre-excited AF; unstable patients get synchronized cardioversion.
- A baseline delta wave may disappear at fast rates or be intermittent. Ask for old ECGs if the story suggests pre-excitation.
Pitfalls
- Avoid AV nodal blockers in pre-excited AF: adenosine, diltiazem, verapamil, beta-blockers, and digoxin can preferentially drive conduction down the accessory pathway.
- Do not confuse regular orthodromic AVRT with pre-excited AF; rhythm regularity changes the medication discussion.
- Computer interpretation may call WPW nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay; measure the PR and inspect the QRS upstroke yourself.
At the Bedside
For stable regular SVT, follow local SVT pathway while considering the mechanism. For irregular wide-complex tachycardia suspicious for pre-excited AF, avoid AV nodal blockers, use procainamide if stable, and cardiovert if unstable.
LITFL ECG Library β Pre-excitation Syndromes / WPW · reviewed 2026-06-12
Pre-excitation Syndromes (WPW) A short PR, a slurred delta-wave upstroke, and a widened QRS mean an accessory pathway β and a tracing that mimics infarction and hypertrophy.
A 24-year-old man presents after a self-terminating episode of palpitations, now asymptomatic with normal vitals. His resting 12-lead is unusual: the PR interval is strikingly short, under 120 ms, and the initial upstroke of each QRS is not sharp but slurred, rising slowly before the complex takes off. The QRS is broadened, though not as wide as a bundle branch block, and the ST segments and T waves point opposite to the main QRS deflection. There is a dominant R wave in V1 with T-wave inversions in the right precordial leads, and a negative deflection at the start of the complex in aVL that could be mistaken for an old lateral Q wave.
Key ECG findings
- Short PR interval < 120 ms
- Delta wave: slurred, slow-rising initial portion of the QRS
- QRS prolongation > 110 ms, but less broad than in bundle branch block
- Discordant ST-segment and T-wave changes (opposite to the major QRS component)
- Pseudo-infarction pattern in up to 70% (negative delta waves creating pseudo-Q waves; dominant R wave in V1-3 mimicking posterior MI or RVH); left-sided AP gives R/S > 1 in V1 (type A), right-sided gives a negative delta in V1-2 (type B)
Pearls
- The delta wave is just early ventricular activation via the bypass tract; abnormal depolarization forces abnormal, discordant repolarization β understanding the mechanism makes the ST/T changes expected rather than alarming.
- Pre-excitation can be subtle or intermittent and may become more obvious with increased vagal tone or AV blockade (e.g. Valsalva or nodal-blocking drugs).
- A concealed pathway conducts only retrograde, so the sinus-rhythm ECG is completely normal β a clean tracing does not exclude an accessory pathway in a patient with documented SVT.
Pitfalls
- Reading the pseudo-infarction Q waves (e.g. in aVL) or the dominant V1-3 R waves as an old MI or ventricular hypertrophy that isn't there.
- In pediatric ECGs the changes are subtle and normal-variant patterns (RSR' with T inversion in V1-2, or a dominant V1 R wave) overlap with WPW β look specifically for delta-wave slurring.
- Overcalling Lown-Ganong-Levine on a short PR with normal QRS β the term should not be applied without paroxysmal tachycardia, and its existence is disputed.
At the Bedside
Identify the accessory pathway on the resting tracing so that, if this patient returns in a tachyarrhythmia, you are prepared β pre-excited atrial fibrillation and AVRT change management, and AV-nodal blockers can be dangerous in pre-excited AF; arrange cardiology/electrophysiology follow-up for a symptomatic patient.
LITFL ECG Library β Pre-excitation Syndromes · reviewed 2026-07-06
Lown-Ganong-Levine Syndrome A short PR with a normal, narrow QRS and paroxysmal tachycardia is the disputed LGL pattern β a pre-excitation label to apply cautiously, if at all.
A 40-year-old woman presents after a self-terminating run of rapid palpitations, her third this year. Between episodes she feels well, with normal vitals. Her resting 12-lead shows a strikingly short PR interval, under 120 milliseconds, but the P-wave axis is normal and the QRS is narrow and entirely normal in shape β there is no slurred upstroke, no delta wave to be found on careful inspection of every lead. The tracing looks almost ordinary apart from that tight PR. The story of recurrent paroxysmal tachycardia is what makes the short PR interesting rather than incidental.
Key ECG findings
- Short PR interval, less than 120 ms
- Normal P-wave axis
- Normal, narrow QRS morphology β no delta wave (unlike WPW)
- Occurs in the setting of paroxysmal tachyarrhythmia
- Historically attributed to an accessory pathway of James fibres
Pearls
- LGL is a short PR with a normal narrow QRS and no delta wave β the absent delta wave and preserved QRS are what separate it from WPW at the bedside.
- The label should not be applied without paroxysmal tachycardia; a short PR alone on an asymptomatic tracing is not LGL.
- The eponym carries proposed anatomic substrates (James fibres between atria and distal AV node; later Brechenmacher's atrio-His tracts), but these remain hypothetical rather than established.
Pitfalls
- The existence of LGL is disputed and the entity may not actually exist β treat it as a description, not a firm diagnosis, and avoid over-committing management to it.
- Do not confuse it with WPW: LGL lacks the delta wave and QRS widening, so a slurred upstroke means you are looking at a different pre-excitation pattern.
- Historically these cases were often just lumped in as WPW variants, so the literature is muddied β anchor on the actual ECG (short PR, narrow QRS, no delta) and the clinical arrhythmia rather than the name.
At the Bedside
Focus management on the documented arrhythmia, not the eponym: work up and treat the paroxysmal tachyarrhythmia on its own merits, and reserve the LGL label for cases that actually pair a short PR and normal QRS with paroxysmal tachycardia.
LITFL ECG Library β Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome · reviewed 2026-07-06
Channelopathies & Inherited (5)
Brugada Syndrome An inherited sodium channelopathy producing characteristic right precordial ST elevation, with a high risk of polymorphic VT and sudden cardiac death.
A 32-year-old man presents after a syncopal episode. His father died of a cardiac arrest in his early 40s. He is afebrile and looks well. The ECG shows V1 and V2 with a coved-shape ST elevation of 2.5 mm, an inverted T wave, and a pseudo-RBBB pattern. The pattern is unchanged on a repeat tracing.
Key ECG findings
- Type 1 (coved): β₯ 2 mm ST elevation in V1βV2 with a downsloping (coved) ST segment, terminating in a negative T wave, in a pseudo-RBBB morphology β diagnostic when seen with a compatible clinical picture
- Type 2 (saddle-back): β₯ 0.5 mm saddle-shaped ST elevation with a positive or biphasic T wave β suspicious, not diagnostic
- Type 3: less than 1 mm ST elevation, coved or saddle morphology β suspicious
- Pattern can fluctuate; absence on a single tracing does not exclude the diagnosis
- High right precordial lead placement (V1βV2 in the second or third intercostal space) can unmask the Type 1 pattern
Pearls
- Fever can unmask or accentuate the Type 1 pattern. Fever in someone with a known or suspected Brugada history is a meaningful trigger to manage aggressively.
- Sodium channel blockers (TCAs, cocaine, propofol, certain antiarrhythmics) can unmask Brugada or precipitate arrhythmia. The medication list and toxicology history matter.
- Brugada pattern + symptoms (syncope, family history of SCD, documented VT/VF) is high-risk and earns EP referral. Brugada pattern alone in an asymptomatic patient with no family history is lower risk but still warrants follow-up.
Pitfalls
- Type 2 and Type 3 patterns are not diagnostic on their own. Don't tell an asymptomatic patient with a saddle-back V1 they have Brugada β they have a suspicious pattern that needs further evaluation.
- RBBB and athletic conditioning can produce ST elevation in V1βV2 that mimics Brugada. The morphology and clinical context separate them.
- A normal ECG in a symptomatic patient does not exclude Brugada. The pattern is intermittent, and provocation testing exists for a reason.
At the Bedside
Type 1 pattern with syncope, documented arrhythmia, or family history of sudden cardiac death warrants admission with cardiology / EP consultation. Treat fever aggressively, avoid sodium channel blockers, and counsel on medication and trigger avoidance. Type 2 / Type 3 patterns alone in an asymptomatic patient warrant outpatient cardiology referral and family screening.
LITFL ECG Library β Brugada Syndrome · reviewed 2026-06-12
Long QT Syndrome QT prolongation is a substrate for torsades; the ED job is to identify the trigger before the malignant rhythm appears.
A 36-year-old woman presents after syncope while taking escitalopram, hydroxyzine, and azithromycin for a respiratory illness. Her ECG shows a QTc over 560 ms with broad-based T waves and a pause-dependent premature ventricular beat. Potassium returns at 3.1 mmol/L and magnesium is low. She is currently awake.
Key ECG findings
- QTc prolongation, commonly >470 ms in men or >480 ms in women and especially concerning when >500 ms
- May show broad-based T waves, T-wave notching, prominent U waves, or T-U fusion depending on cause
- Pause-dependent PVCs can initiate torsades
- Acquired causes include medications, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, bradycardia, and structural heart disease
- Inherited forms include Romano-Ward and Jervell-Lange-Nielsen variants
Pearls
- QTc >500 ms is the threshold where your attention should sharpen; risk rises further with hypokalemia, bradycardia, and medication stacking.
- Medication reconciliation is treatment. Stop the offending drugs and correct potassium and magnesium aggressively.
- Syncope with prolonged QT is not benign fainting; it may be self-terminating torsades.
Pitfalls
- Automated QTc can be wrong when T and U waves merge. Manually inspect the tracing when the number drives disposition.
- Do not give more QT-prolonging antiemetics or antipsychotics to the patient whose ECG is already warning you.
- Congenital long QT may have a normal-looking ECG at times; family history and exertional or auditory-trigger syncope matter.
At the Bedside
Stop QT-prolonging medications, correct K/Mg/Ca, place on telemetry, and treat torsades immediately if it occurs. Syncope, QTc >500 ms with symptoms, or congenital concern warrants admission or urgent cardiology input.
LITFL ECG Library β QT Interval / Long QT · reviewed 2026-06-12
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD) A young patient with exertional syncope, T-wave inversion in V1-V3 without a bundle branch block, and a small terminal notch after the QRS is carrying the second most common cause of sudden death in the young.
A 22-year-old soccer player collapses on the field, is briefly unconscious, and walks into your ED insisting he is fine. He mentions his cousin died suddenly in his twenties. Vitals are normal. His resting 12-lead shows deeply inverted T waves across V1, V2, and V3, yet the QRS is not broad in the way a bundle branch block would make it, and there is no RSR' pattern. Looking closely at the terminal QRS in V1 you can make out a small, low-amplitude deflection riding just after the S wave, before the ST segment. The precordial S waves rise sluggishly. On the monitor you catch a run of broad-complex beats with a left bundle pattern and an inferior axis.
Key ECG findings
- T-wave inversion in the right precordial leads V1-V3 in the absence of RBBB (seen in ~85% of patients)
- Epsilon wave β a small terminal deflection after the QRS, best seen in V1; the most specific finding, present in ~50%
- Localized QRS widening in V1-V3 (>110 ms) and a prolonged S-wave upstroke (55 ms) in V1-V3
- Ventricular ectopy of LBBB morphology, with frequent PVCs (>1000 per 24 hours)
- Paroxysmal VT with LBBB morphology and an inferior axis (RVOT tachycardia)
Pearls
- The epsilon wave is subtle and easily lost in baseline artifact. Recording at double speed (50 mm/s) and double amplitude, or using Fontaine bipolar precordial leads (RA on the manubrium, LA on the xiphoid, LL at V4), raises your yield for catching it.
- The first presenting symptom can be sudden cardiac death, and there is usually a family history of it β take the exertional syncope and the family history as seriously as the tracing.
- The broad-complex VT of ARVD arises from the diseased right ventricle, so it carries an LBBB morphology with an inferior axis β a useful fingerprint distinguishing RVOT tachycardia from other wide-complex rhythms.
Pitfalls
- The right precordial T-wave inversion mimics benign persistent juvenile T-wave inversion, RBBB, and right-heart strain β but ARVD shows this pattern without a completed RBBB, which should prompt a second look.
- A normal-looking resting ECG does not exclude ARVD; the diagnosis rests on a combination of clinical, ECG, and imaging (echo, cardiac MRI) features per the 2010 Task Force Criteria.
- Reassuring and discharging a young syncope patient with these findings misses a high-risk substrate β syncope from cardiac arrest, unsuppressed arrhythmias, or a family history of arrest all mark high risk of sudden death.
At the Bedside
Do not clear this athlete. Admit for cardiology and electrophysiology evaluation with echo and cardiac MRI. Arrhythmia suppression is with beta-blockers, amiodarone, or sotalol; patients with any high-risk feature (syncope from cardiac arrest, recurrent unsuppressed arrhythmias, or first-degree family history of cardiac arrest) need urgent ICD implantation.
LITFL ECG Library β Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Short QT Syndrome A persistently short QT with tall peaked T waves in a young patient with syncope or a family history of sudden death is a rare but lethal channelopathy.
A 28-year-old man presents after a syncopal episode and a scare of rapid palpitations. He is healthy, athletic, and has no structural heart disease on prior evaluation; a maternal uncle died suddenly in his thirties. Vitals are normal. His 12-lead catches your eye because the interval from the QRS to the end of the T wave looks unusually compressed, with a very short or almost absent ST segment. The T waves are tall, narrow, and peaked, most striking across the precordial leads. On a rhythm strip taken while his heart rate slowed into the 60s, the short interval does not lengthen the way you would expect. You pull his old tracings to compare.
Key ECG findings
- Short QT interval β known patients had QT <320 ms and QTc <340 ms; QTc <330 ms (men) or <340 ms (women) is considered diagnostic
- Peaked T waves, particularly in the precordial leads
- Short or absent ST segments
- Lack of normal QT lengthening as heart rate slows β a fixed QT that fails to prolong at slower rates
- Paroxysmal episodes of atrial or ventricular fibrillation
Pearls
- At fast heart rates the calculated QTc can look deceptively normal ('pseudonormal'); capture the abnormality by looking at rest, with serial ECGs or Holter monitoring during relative bradycardia (60-80 bpm).
- The most common initial presentation is cardiac arrest (about one-third of cases), and up to 80% have documented atrial fibrillation β so AF in a young patient with a short QT is a red flag, not an incidental finding.
- This is on the same channelopathy spectrum as long QT, Brugada, and CPVT; diagnosis leans on symptoms and family history alongside the ECG because there are no formal diagnostic criteria.
Pitfalls
- Dismissing a short QT as a measurement artifact or benign variant can miss a substrate whose first manifestation is sudden death β including a possible cause of SIDS in infants.
- A pseudonormal QTc at tachycardic rates can falsely reassure; the fixed QT that fails to prolong when the rate slows is the giveaway.
- Reaching for class III agents like sotalol or ibutilide is ineffective here due to poor drug binding to the mutated channels; quinidine is the pharmacologic agent of choice, and definitive therapy is an ICD.
At the Bedside
Take a young patient with a persistently short QT and syncope, palpitations, arrest, or a family history of early sudden death seriously: place them on monitoring, obtain serial/resting ECGs to confirm the QT fails to prolong at slower rates, and refer urgently to cardiology/electrophysiology β definitive treatment is ICD implantation, with quinidine as the pharmacologic option.
LITFL ECG Library β Short QT Syndrome · reviewed 2026-07-06
Bundgaard Syndrome (Familial ST-Segment Depression Syndrome) Fixed, widespread concave-upward ST depression with ST elevation in aVR that never changes and shows clean coronaries is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome, not ischemia.
A 46-year-old woman presents with chest pain, and her ECG raises immediate alarm: concave-upward ST depression spread across at least seven leads β I, II, aVL, aVF and V2 through V6 β with reciprocal ST elevation in lead aVR. It looks exactly like the left-main-insufficiency pattern that would send you racing to the cath lab. But the story doesn't fit: serial troponins are flat, and when the angiogram comes back it is pristine, with no coronary disease and no ischemia. Digging up an old ECG from years earlier, you find the identical pattern, unchanged. On close inspection there is a subtle notch in the ascending limb of the ST segment in V3-4. Her father died suddenly and young.
Key ECG findings
- Widespread concave-upward ST depression in at least 7 leads, measured 90 ms after the J point
- ST elevation in lead aVR > 0.1 mV
- The pattern is persistent and static over time (unlike Brugada or LQTS), accentuated by exercise
- A notch in the ascending part of the ST segment in the precordial leads, most prominent in V3-4
- Autosomal dominant inheritance
Pearls
- The whole diagnosis hinges on 'unexplained': the criteria require excluding ischemia, structural heart disease and metabolic derangement before the label is applied.
- The static, unchanging nature over years is the key discriminator β an acute ischemic pattern evolves, this one does not.
- Affected individuals stay asymptomatic until tachyarrhythmias emerge, often starting with atrial fibrillation and progressing to VT/VF and sudden cardiac death, so recognition triggers family screening.
Pitfalls
- Mistaking it for the acute left-main / diffuse-ST-depression-with-aVR-elevation ischemic pattern and subjecting the patient to repeated unnecessary catheterization.
- Being falsely reassured by a negative genetic test β no causative gene has yet been identified, so genetics cannot exclude the syndrome.
- Failing to compare with prior ECGs; without the old tracing showing the identical static pattern, the diagnosis is easily missed.
At the Bedside
When chest-pain workup yields clean labs and clean coronaries but this fixed diffuse ST-depression/aVR-elevation pattern persists, stop re-cathing and instead flag familial ST-segment depression syndrome for cardiology evaluation and screening of first-degree relatives given the sudden-death risk.
LITFL ECG Library β Bundgaard syndrome · reviewed 2026-07-06
Electrolyte & Metabolic (6)
Hyperkalemia Peaked T waves are an early warning; QRS widening and sine-wave morphology are the pre-arrest findings that demand immediate calcium.
A 68-year-old dialysis patient arrives weak and nauseated after missing dialysis. The monitor shows a slow wide-complex rhythm. The 12-lead has tall narrow-based T waves that look too sharp for ischemia, PR prolongation, flattening P waves, and a QRS that is beginning to widen in the precordial leads. The nurse is waiting for the chemistry panel.
Key ECG findings
- Tall, narrow-based, symmetric peaked T waves, often best seen in the precordial leads
- Progressive PR prolongation and P-wave flattening or loss as potassium rises
- QRS widening that can merge with T waves into a sine-wave pattern in severe toxicity
- Bradyarrhythmias, escape rhythms, bundle branch blocks, or pseudo-STEMI patterns may occur
- ECG severity does not perfectly correlate with the serum potassium value
Pearls
- ECG changes from hyperkalemia are a calcium indication. Stabilize the myocardium first, then shift and remove potassium.
- Do not wait for the lab value when the ECG and story fit; hemolysis delays can cost the patient the arrest window.
- Hyperkalemia can mimic STEMI, Brugada, VT, and bundle branch block. A dialysis or renal-failure context should make potassium one of the first reflex diagnoses.
Pitfalls
- A normal ECG does not exclude dangerous hyperkalemia. Treat the patient, potassium value, and trend, not the tracing alone.
- Albuterol, insulin, bicarbonate, and dialysis move or remove potassium; only calcium stabilizes the membrane immediately.
- Peaked T waves from hyperkalemia are usually narrow and tented; ischemic hyperacute T waves tend to be broader and regional.
At the Bedside
Give IV calcium immediately for ECG changes or instability, then insulin/dextrose and other shifting therapies while arranging definitive potassium removal. Place on continuous monitoring and repeat ECG after calcium.
LITFL ECG Library β Hyperkalaemia · reviewed 2026-06-12
Hypokalemia Flattened T waves, prominent U waves, and a QT that isn't really a QT should send you straight to the potassium β and the magnesium.
A 62-year-old woman on chronic furosemide presents with palpitations and generalized weakness after a week of vomiting. Heart rate is 96, blood pressure normal. The monitor shows frequent ventricular ectopics. On the 12-lead, the T waves are strikingly flat and the precordial leads V2 and V3 carry tall, rounded humps riding just after each T. There is widespread ST depression. The computer flags a markedly prolonged QT, but on close inspection the T and U waves have fused into a single long deflection with no clear separation. The P waves look taller than expected and the PR interval is stretched. While you are reading the tracing, a run of polymorphic ventricular beats crosses the strip.
Key ECG findings
- Decreased T wave amplitude (the earliest change), progressing to T wave flattening and inversion
- Prominent U waves, best seen in precordial leads V2-V3
- Widespread ST depression
- Apparent long QT that is actually a long QU interval from fusion of T and U waves
- Increased P wave amplitude and PR interval prolongation
- Frequent supraventricular and ventricular ectopics; risk of AF, atrial flutter, VT, VF and torsades
Pearls
- The 'long QT' the machine reports is usually the QU interval β the T wave is buried and you are measuring through a fused U wave. Recognizing that changes the fix from an antiarrhythmic to potassium replacement.
- Think of hypokalemia as the T wave being 'pushed down' (flattening, ST depression, prominent U), the mirror image of hyperkalemia 'pulling' the T wave up into a tent.
- Hypokalemia rarely travels alone. It commonly coexists with hypomagnesemia, which is what tips an irritable myocardium into malignant ventricular arrhythmia.
Pitfalls
- ECG changes generally don't appear until potassium is moderately low (2.5-2.9 mmol/L), so a normal-looking tracing does not exclude clinically important hypokalemia.
- Replacing potassium while ignoring a low magnesium leaves the patient at ongoing risk for torsades β check and replace both.
- Mistaking the fused T-U complex for genuine QT prolongation and reaching for the wrong intervention instead of correcting the electrolyte.
At the Bedside
Check potassium and magnesium together. Replace potassium to >=4.0 mmol/L and magnesium to >=1.0 mmol/L to stabilize the myocardium; put the patient on a monitor for ectopy and torsades, and treat sustained polymorphic VT with IV magnesium.
LITFL ECG Library β Hypokalemia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Hypercalcemia A short QT interval in a patient with malignancy or renal stones points to hypercalcemia, and at extreme levels the ECG turns bizarre with a real risk of VF arrest.
A 41-year-old man with known parathyroid disease is brought in critically unwell β confused, dehydrated, and profoundly weak. While the nurse hangs fluids you glance at the monitor and the 12-lead. The QRS complexes look strange and misshapen, and the interval from the QRS to the end of the T wave is strikingly compressed β the T wave seems to sit almost on top of the QRS with barely any ST segment between them. In lead V1 there is a notch on the terminal portion of the QRS complex. The stat chemistry panel is still pending, but you know a J-wave notch and a QT this short in a sick patient is a warning. Moments later the rhythm degenerates on the monitor.
Key ECG findings
- Shortening of the QT interval β the hallmark abnormality (can be as short as ~260 ms)
- Osborn (J) waves β notching of the terminal QRS β in severe hypercalcemia, best seen in V1
- Bizarre, misshapen QRS complexes at extreme calcium levels
- Ventricular irritability with reported VF arrest in extreme hypercalcemia
Pearls
- The QT shortens as calcium rises; severity tracks the level β mild 2.7-2.9, moderate 3.0-3.4, severe >3.4 mmol/L. A conspicuously short QT should make you send an ionized/corrected calcium.
- Osborn waves are not exclusive to hypothermia β here they appear in a normothermic patient purely from severe hypercalcemia, so their presence should not anchor you on cold exposure.
- The reported etiologies are worth pattern-matching at the bedside: hyperparathyroidism, myeloma, bony metastases, paraneoplastic syndromes, milk-alkali, sarcoidosis, and vitamin D excess.
Pitfalls
- Extreme hypercalcemia can precipitate VF arrest β treat a critically unwell patient with a very short QT and bizarre QRS as an emergency, not a lab curiosity.
- Limb-lead reversal can exaggerate the apparent abnormality; confirm lead placement before over-interpreting a bizarre tracing.
- Anchoring on the odd QRS morphology can distract from the one finding that matters most for recognition β the strikingly short QT interval.
At the Bedside
Recognize the short QT as a chemistry emergency: send a corrected/ionized calcium immediately and begin treatment of severe hypercalcemia (aggressive IV fluids and calcium-lowering therapy) while placing the patient on continuous cardiac monitoring, given the risk of VF arrest.
LITFL ECG Library β Hypercalcemia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Hypocalcemia A long QT driven by a stretched ST segment β with a normal-looking T wave β points to low calcium.
A 45-year-old woman who had a thyroidectomy weeks ago presents with tingling around the mouth, cramping hands, and intermittent muscle spasms. Her fingers draw into a claw when the blood-pressure cuff inflates. Vitals are stable. The ECG is in sinus rhythm, but the QTc measures around 500 ms. Looking closely, the prolongation comes from a markedly lengthened, flat ST segment that pushes the T wave later and later; the T wave itself is normal in shape and width. There are no U waves and no ectopy, just that stretched isoelectric segment between the QRS and an unremarkable T.
Key ECG findings
- QTc prolongation as the hallmark change (examples with QTc ~500β510 ms)
- Prolongation driven specifically by lengthening of the ST segment
- T wave typically normal / unchanged in morphology
- Dysrhythmias uncommon, though atrial fibrillation has been reported
- Torsades de pointes possible but much less common than with hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia
Pearls
- The mechanism is the teaching point: it is the ST segment that stretches, not the T wave β so a long QT with a normal-shaped, normally-timed T wave should steer you toward calcium.
- Read the ECG alongside the bedside signs of neuromuscular excitability β carpopedal spasm, tetany, Chvostek and Trousseau signs, even seizures β which travel with the low calcium.
- Anchor the numbers: normal corrected calcium is about 2.2β2.6 mmol/L, and severe hypocalcemia is < 1.9 mmol/L; the ECG cases correlate long QT with corrected calcium in the 1.3β1.4 range.
Pitfalls
- Reflexively blaming a long QT on a drug or hypokalemia and missing calcium β the ST-segment morphology is the discriminator.
- Hunt for the cause: hypoparathyroidism (including post-thyroidectomy), vitamin D deficiency, acute pancreatitis, hyperphosphatemia, hypomagnesemia, and critical illness such as sepsis.
- Do not be reassured that torsades is 'less common' with hypocalcemia β a QTc of 500 ms still carries proarrhythmic risk.
At the Bedside
Confirm with a corrected (or ionized) calcium and a magnesium, and replace calcium β urgently and intravenously if the patient is symptomatic with tetany, seizures, or marked QT prolongation. Correct coexisting low magnesium, since it perpetuates the hypocalcemia.
LITFL ECG Library β Hypocalcaemia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Hypomagnesemia A prolonged QT with ventricular ectopy and a magnesium nobody checked is the setup for torsades.
A 76-year-old man presents with palpitations. He is intermittently symptomatic and looks anxious but perfused. The 12-lead shows sinus rhythm with a markedly prolonged QTc measured at 510 ms and a slightly long PR interval. Over a few minutes on the monitor you catch frequent ventricular ectopics and then a short run of nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia that self-terminates. His serum potassium and calcium are pending. The QRS duration and ST segments look unremarkable. As you are drawing up your plan, the monitor alarms again β this time the run is longer and the patient briefly loses consciousness before it breaks.
Key ECG findings
- Prolonged QT interval
- Prolonged PR interval
- Atrial and ventricular ectopy
- Predisposition to ventricular tachycardia and torsades de pointes
- QRS duration and ST segments typically unchanged in isolated hypomagnesemia
Pearls
- The dangerous ECG change to hang your hat on is QT prolongation with ectopy β that combination is the torsades runway.
- Hypomagnesemia rarely occurs in isolation; it usually travels with hypokalemia and/or hypocalcemia, and the tracing may show the changes of those disturbances layered on top.
- Because most studies never excluded coexisting electrolyte problems, the 'pure' hypomagnesemia ECG is poorly defined β treat the clinical picture and the arrhythmia risk, not a textbook pattern.
Pitfalls
- Correcting the potassium while leaving a low magnesium unaddressed misses a key driver of ongoing ectopy and ventricular arrhythmia.
- Attributing a prolonged QT solely to drugs or hypokalemia and never sending a magnesium level.
- Assuming a normal QRS and normal ST segments mean the electrolyte is fine β in isolated hypomagnesemia those are expected to be normal.
At the Bedside
Give a rapid IV bolus of 2 g magnesium for torsades. Correct serum magnesium to >1.0 mmol/L with concurrent correction of potassium to >4.0 mmol/L to suppress ectopy and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, and keep the patient monitored.
LITFL ECG Library β Hypomagnesemia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Hypothermia / Osborn Waves J waves after the QRS in a cold patient are Osborn waves until proven otherwise; the dysrhythmia risk rises as the temperature falls.
A 54-year-old unhoused patient is found outside overnight and arrives confused with a core temperature of 29Β°C. The ECG shows sinus bradycardia, a prolonged PR and QT interval, and prominent positive deflections at the J point in the inferior and lateral leads. The monitor intermittently shows atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular response.
Key ECG findings
- Osborn waves: positive deflection at the J point, often best in inferior and lateral leads
- Sinus bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, PR prolongation, QRS widening, and QT prolongation may occur
- Artifact from shivering can mimic atrial flutter or ventricular fibrillation
- Severe hypothermia increases risk of ventricular dysrhythmias, including VF
- ECG changes generally improve with rewarming
Pearls
- The treatment is rewarming and gentle handling. The myocardium becomes irritable as hypothermia worsens.
- Atrial fibrillation in hypothermia often resolves with rewarming and usually does not need aggressive rhythm control in the ED.
- Osborn waves are not exclusive to hypothermia, but hypothermia is the bedside diagnosis you cannot miss.
Pitfalls
- Do not shock fine shivering artifact mistaken for VF; check patient responsiveness, pulse, and multiple leads.
- Do not rely on a peripheral temperature; get a real core temperature.
- Standard ACLS medication timing changes in severe hypothermia. Follow local hypothermic arrest protocol.
At the Bedside
Confirm core temperature, begin active rewarming, handle gently, correct glucose/electrolytes, and monitor for dysrhythmias. In arrest, follow hypothermic cardiac arrest protocol and continue resuscitation until rewarmed per local guidance.
LITFL ECG Library β Hypothermia · reviewed 2026-05-11
Toxicology (5)
Beta-blocker Toxicity Bradycardia plus shock after beta-blocker exposure can progress to conduction failure, seizures, and cardiovascular collapse.
A 45-year-old patient is brought in after ingesting an unknown number of propranolol tablets. The ECG shows sinus bradycardia with a prolonged PR interval. The patient is hypotensive and then has a generalized seizure. A repeat ECG shows QRS widening.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus bradycardia, junctional bradycardia, or AV block
- Hypotension may be disproportionate to the ECG rate alone
- QRS widening can occur with propranolol or other membrane-stabilizing beta-blockers
- QT prolongation may occur with sotalol and increases torsades risk
- Hypoglycemia can occur, especially in children or depleted patients
Pearls
- Not all beta-blockers are the same: propranolol can cause seizures and QRS widening; sotalol can cause QT prolongation and torsades.
- Glucagon may help, but high-dose insulin therapy and vasopressors are often needed in severe shock.
- QRS widening in propranolol toxicity should trigger sodium bicarbonate thinking.
Pitfalls
- Do not let a transient glucagon response falsely reassure you; recurrent shock is common in severe overdose.
- Do not miss co-ingested calcium-channel blockers, clonidine, digoxin, or sedatives.
- Do not focus only on heart rate; perfusion is the endpoint.
At the Bedside
Call poison control early. Support airway/perfusion, consider glucagon, vasopressors, high-dose insulin therapy, sodium bicarbonate for QRS widening, lipid therapy for refractory lipophilic beta-blocker shock per guidance, and ICU admission.
LITFL Toxicology / ECG Library β Beta Blocker Toxicity · reviewed 2026-06-12
Calcium-channel Blocker Toxicity Bradycardia, AV block, shock, and hyperglycemia after CCB exposure is a high-risk tox ECG pattern even before the medication list is complete.
A 52-year-old patient arrives altered and hypotensive after a suspected overdose. The ECG shows sinus bradycardia with first-degree AV block that progresses to junctional bradycardia. Glucose is 340 despite no diabetes history.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus bradycardia, junctional rhythm, or high-grade AV block
- QRS is usually narrow unless severe shock, co-ingestion, or metabolic derangement develops
- Hypotension may be profound despite relatively bland ECG findings
- Hyperglycemia supports CCB toxicity, especially with verapamil or diltiazem
- Extended-release preparations can cause delayed or prolonged deterioration
Pearls
- The ECG may understate the shock. CCB toxicity is a hemodynamic poison, not just a rhythm problem.
- Hyperglycemia is a clue because calcium-channel blockade impairs insulin release.
- High-dose insulin euglycemia therapy is a core treatment; call poison control early.
Pitfalls
- Do not treat this like simple bradycardia and stop at atropine.
- Do not underestimate extended-release CCB ingestions after a stable early period.
- Do not miss mixed beta-blocker/CCB overdoses; medication reconciliation and tox consultation matter.
At the Bedside
Support airway and perfusion, give calcium, start vasopressors and high-dose insulin therapy per local/poison-control guidance, treat hypoglycemia/hypokalemia during HIET monitoring, and admit to ICU.
LITFL Toxicology / ECG Library β Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity · reviewed 2026-06-12
Digoxin Toxicity The combination of increased atrial automaticity and suppressed AV conduction on one tracing should make you think about digoxin before anything else.
An 82-year-old woman on digoxin and a diuretic for atrial fibrillation is brought in with two days of nausea, vomiting, and vague visual disturbance β she keeps mentioning that lights look yellow. She is bradycardic at 44 and mildly confused. The monitor shows an atrial rate around 150 with regular P waves, but only one QRS conducts for every four atrial beats, and frequent wide premature complexes interrupt the rhythm. On another strip her underlying fibrillation has become strikingly regular at a slow rate, with a narrow escape rhythm marching out independently. The rhythm keeps shifting between these patterns as you watch.
Key ECG findings
- Classic combination: supraventricular tachycardia from increased automaticity plus a slow ventricular response from depressed AV conduction
- Frequent PVCs β the most common abnormality β including ventricular bigeminy and trigeminy
- Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia with high-grade AV block (e.g. atrial rate 150 with a 4:1 A:V ratio)
- Regularized atrial fibrillation: AF with complete heart block and a junctional or ventricular escape rhythm
- Any degree of AV block, sinus bradycardia, slow AF, and bidirectional VT (frontal-plane axis alternating 180 degrees beat to beat)
Pearls
- The signature is paradoxical: enhanced automaticity above and blocked conduction below, on the same tracing. A tachy atrial focus with a paradoxically slow ventricular rate is digoxin until proven otherwise.
- When chronic AF suddenly becomes regular, do not read it as reversion to sinus β regularized AF means complete heart block with an escape rhythm, a marker of toxicity.
- The extracardiac clues travel with the ECG: nausea, anorexia, confusion, and the classic yellow-green vision or haloes. Ask about them when the rhythm is puzzling.
Pitfalls
- Bidirectional VT is nearly pathognomonic but easily mistaken for a nonspecific broad-complex tachycardia β look for the beat-to-beat 180-degree axis flip.
- Digoxin can produce almost any dysrhythmia, so a 'nonspecific' abnormal rhythm in a patient on digoxin should not be dismissed.
- Atrial tachycardia with block can be misread as a primary AV conduction disorder, missing the drug as the unifying cause.
At the Bedside
Recognize the pattern, stop the digoxin, and check a level and potassium. Treat the toxic patient β significant dysrhythmia, hemodynamic compromise, or hyperkalemia β with digoxin-specific antibody fragments (Fab) rather than chasing individual rhythms.
LITFL ECG Library β Digoxin Toxicity · reviewed 2026-07-06
Sodium Channel Blocker Toxicity A wide QRS with a terminal R wave in aVR after overdose is sodium-channel blockade until proven otherwise.
A 29-year-old patient is brought in somnolent after an unknown ingestion. The ECG shows sinus tachycardia with a QRS of 142 ms, a tall terminal R wave in aVR, and a slurred S wave in lead I. Blood pressure is soft and the patient has intermittent ventricular ectopy. The pill bottle history is unclear.
Key ECG findings
- QRS widening, often >100 ms and especially concerning when >120β160 ms
- Terminal R wave in aVR or R/S ratio >0.7 in aVR
- Rightward terminal QRS axis with deep terminal S wave in lead I
- Sinus tachycardia is common with anticholinergic co-toxicity, especially TCAs
- Severe cases can progress to ventricular dysrhythmias, hypotension, seizures, or Brugada-like patterns
Pearls
- The ECG is the antidote trigger. Sodium bicarbonate is indicated for QRS widening, ventricular dysrhythmia, or hypotension from sodium-channel blockade.
- TCAs are classic, but the pattern also appears with carbamazepine, diphenhydramine, cocaine, certain antipsychotics, and other sodium-channel blockers.
- The treatment target is QRS narrowing and hemodynamic improvement, not a specific blood pH number in isolation.
Pitfalls
- Do not anchor on the stated ingestion; patients often do not know or do not tell you what they took.
- A normal early ECG can evolve. Repeat ECGs are part of the tox workup when the history is concerning.
- Amiodarone can worsen sodium-channel blockade physiology; discuss with poison control for ventricular dysrhythmias.
At the Bedside
Give sodium bicarbonate boluses for QRS widening, hypotension, or ventricular dysrhythmia; repeat until QRS narrows and perfusion improves. Treat seizures aggressively, call poison control, and prepare vasopressors or lipid therapy for refractory shock depending on agent.
LITFL ECG Library / Toxicology β Sodium Channel Blocker Toxicity · reviewed 2026-06-12
Digoxin Effect Sagging 'reverse-tick' ST depression with a short QT means the patient takes digoxin β it does not mean they are toxic.
A 70-year-old woman on long-standing digoxin for atrial fibrillation comes in for a pre-operative evaluation, entirely asymptomatic. Her ECG catches your eye: across the lateral leads V4-6, I and aVL, the ST segments sag downward in a smooth downsloping curve that looks like a reverse tick β a shape someone once dubbed Salvador Dali's moustache. The T waves are biphasic, dipping negative first and then rising to a small terminal peak continuous with the depressed ST segment. The QT interval looks short, the PR is mildly long, and there are prominent U waves. You find yourself wondering whether this tracing is telling you she is poisoned.
Key ECG findings
- Downsloping ('sagging') ST depression with the characteristic reverse-tick / Salvador Dali moustache morphology
- Shortened QT interval
- Biphasic T waves (initial negative, terminal positive deflection), typically in leads with a dominant R wave such as V4-6
- Mild PR prolongation (up to ~240 ms from increased vagal tone), prominent U waves, and J-point depression in leads with tall R waves
Pearls
- Digoxin effect is a therapeutic-dose phenomenon: it tells you the patient is on digoxin, not that they are toxic β the two are distinct entities.
- The short QT and sagging morphology, with the T wave continuous with the depressed ST segment, are the fingerprints that separate it from primary ischemia.
- The mechanism is intuitive: shortened refractory periods give the short QT and repolarization changes, while increased vagal tone at the AV node lengthens the PR.
Pitfalls
- Mistaking the J-point depression and sagging ST for left ventricular hypertrophy β the short QT, inferior sagging, and absent LVH voltage criteria give it away.
- Reading the ST depression as active ischemia and launching an ACS workup in an asymptomatic patient with classic digoxin effect.
- Conversely, dismissing the whole tracing as 'just digoxin effect' and missing signs of true toxicity β frequent PVCs or other ectopy on the same ECG should raise that concern.
At the Bedside
Recognize digoxin effect as an expected finding rather than an emergency: do not treat it as ischemia or LVH, but do scrutinize the same tracing for ectopy or arrhythmia that would signal genuine digoxin toxicity and change management.
LITFL ECG Library β Digoxin Effect · reviewed 2026-07-06
Pulmonary & Thoracic (5)
Pulmonary Embolism / RV Strain ECG cannot rule out PE, but acute right-heart strain patterns can identify a sicker PE phenotype.
A 51-year-old woman with sudden dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, and syncope has an ECG showing sinus tachycardia, a new right bundle branch block, right-axis deviation, and deep T-wave inversions in V1 through V4 and lead III. The classic S1Q3T3 pattern is present but subtle. Bedside echo shows RV dilation.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus tachycardia is the most common ECG abnormality
- Right ventricular strain pattern: T-wave inversions in V1βV4 and inferior leads, especially lead III
- Right-axis deviation, right bundle branch block, or incomplete RBBB may occur
- S1Q3T3 can be present but is neither sensitive nor specific
- Severe PE can produce atrial arrhythmias, ST elevation in aVR, or anterior ischemia mimics from RV pressure overload
Pearls
- Anterior T-wave inversions in PE often reflect RV strain, not LAD ischemia; the clinical context and echo help separate them.
- ECG is a risk-stratification clue, not a rule-out tool. A normal ECG never excludes PE.
- Syncope plus RV strain on ECG should push you toward higher-risk PE thinking while definitive imaging and resuscitation proceed.
Pitfalls
- Do not wait for S1Q3T3. It is memorable, not reliable.
- Do not dismiss anterior T-wave inversions as anxiety or nonspecific changes in a hypoxic tachycardic patient.
- PE can coexist with ACS risk factors; avoid premature closure when the story or troponin is mixed.
At the Bedside
Use the ECG to support concern for RV strain and severity while pursuing PE workup. If unstable, activate local massive PE pathway, obtain bedside echo when available, start anticoagulation if not contraindicated, and consider thrombolysis or advanced therapy per protocol.
LITFL ECG Library β Pulmonary Embolism · reviewed 2026-05-11
Right Ventricular Strain T wave inversions in the right precordial AND inferior leads point at the right heart β and in the acute patient, at the pulmonary artery.
A 67-year-old woman presents with acute dyspnea and pleuritic chest pain after a long flight. She is tachycardic and hypoxic on room air. The 12-lead shows T wave inversions across the right precordial leads V1 to V4, and simultaneously in the inferior leads, most pronounced in lead III. The axis is deviated rightward and V1 carries a dominant R wave with a deep S wave persisting into V6. There is downsloping ST depression in the same right-sided leads. The left-sided leads I, aVL, V5 and V6 are relatively spared. She looks unwell and her heart rate is climbing.
Key ECG findings
- ST depression and T wave inversion in the right precordial leads V1-3 (+/- V4)
- T wave inversion in the inferior leads II, III, aVF, often most pronounced in lead III (the most rightward-facing lead)
- Right axis deviation
- Dominant R wave in V1
- Dominant S wave in V5 or V6
- Distinct from left ventricular strain, where the ST/T changes sit in the left-sided leads I, aVL, V5-6
Pearls
- The tell is the distribution: right precordial plus inferior TWI, with the inferior changes deepest in lead III because it faces most rightward. That paired pattern is what marks the right ventricle.
- Contrast it deliberately with LV strain, where the repolarization changes live in I, aVL, and V5-6 β location, not morphology, does the sorting.
- In a hemodynamically threatened, acutely dyspneic patient, a new RV strain pattern is a red flag for acute RV dilatation from a massive PE, not a chronic finding to be filed away.
Pitfalls
- Right precordial TWI from acute RV strain can look almost identical to Wellens-type anterior T wave inversion β clinical context (dyspnea and hypoxia vs. resolved chest pain) has to separate them.
- Reading the inferior and anterior TWI as ischemia and anchoring on ACS while a pulmonary embolism goes untreated.
- Assuming strain always means chronic disease β pulmonary hypertension, mitral stenosis, and cor pulmonale produce it chronically, but acute RV dilatation from PE produces it in minutes.
At the Bedside
Read a new RV strain pattern in an acutely unwell, dyspneic, hypoxic patient as presumed acute RV dilatation and work up PE urgently (bedside echo for RV dilatation, CT pulmonary angiography, risk-stratify for thrombolysis). When chronic, pursue the cause of right heart pressure or volume overload.
LITFL ECG Library β Right Ventricular Strain · reviewed 2026-07-06
ECG in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease A vertical, clockwise-rotated heart with tiny left-sided voltages and rightward P waves is the ECG signature of hyperinflated lungs.
A 70-year-old man with a long smoking history presents with worsening breathlessness. He is barrel-chested, tachycardic, and using accessory muscles. The 12-lead shows a vertical QRS axis around +90 degrees. The P waves are peaked and tall in the inferior leads but flattened and inverted in leads I and aVL, sitting on a rightward axis. The precordial leads show delayed R/S transition with clockwise rotation and near-absent R waves in V1 to V3. The QRS voltages are strikingly low over the left precordium in V4 to V6, and the PR and ST segments sag below the baseline. On the rhythm strip you notice the rate is irregular, with the P waves changing shape from beat to beat.
Key ECG findings
- Rightward shift of the P wave axis β peaked P waves in the inferior leads, flattened or inverted P waves in I and aVL
- Rightward QRS axis toward +90 degrees or beyond (right axis deviation)
- Low voltage QRS, especially in the left precordial leads V4-6
- Clockwise rotation with delayed R/S transition, +/- persistent S wave in V6 and absent R waves in V1-3 (the SV1-SV2-SV3 pattern)
- PR and ST segments that sag below the TP baseline
- With cor pulmonale: P pulmonale (right atrial enlargement) and right ventricular hypertrophy; may show RBBB or multifocal atrial tachycardia
Pearls
- The whole picture flows from mechanics: hyperinflated lungs push the diaphragm down and rotate the heart clockwise into a vertical position, so the axis swings right and the R waves vanish from the right precordium.
- The low voltages are an air problem β increased air between heart and electrodes damps the signal β so don't misread small left-sided complexes as an infarct or cardiomyopathy in a known emphysematous chest.
- Multifocal atrial tachycardia (irregular, at least three distinct P wave morphologies) is the arrhythmia to name here; it is associated with increased mortality in COPD.
Pitfalls
- Calling the SV1-SV2-SV3 pattern of absent right precordial R waves an anterior MI when it is clockwise rotation from lung disease.
- Mistaking multifocal atrial tachycardia for atrial fibrillation because both are irregular β the multiple distinct P wave morphologies distinguish it, and the treatment differs.
- Dismissing peaked inferior P waves as artifact rather than recognizing P pulmonale and evolving cor pulmonale.
At the Bedside
Recognize the pattern as chronic lung disease so you don't chase a false anterior MI or mistreat MAT as AF; treat the underlying COPD and hypoxia, and when P pulmonale and RVH appear, work up cor pulmonale.
LITFL ECG Library β ECG in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · reviewed 2026-07-06
Right Ventricular Hypertrophy A dominant R wave in V1 with right axis deviation and right precordial strain is the ECG fingerprint of a pressure-loaded right ventricle.
A 54-year-old woman with longstanding dyspnea on exertion has an ECG done for palpitations. The frontal axis is swung far to the right, around +150 degrees. In V1 the QRS is dominated by a tall R wave over 7 mm with an R/S ratio greater than 1, while V6 shows a correspondingly deep dominant S wave. The right precordial leads V1-4 carry down-sloping ST depression with T wave inversion, and the same strain pattern reaches into the inferior leads. The P wave in lead II is tall and peaked at over 2.5 mm. The QRS is not wide enough to be a bundle branch block. The overall picture is of a right-sided chamber under strain.
Key ECG findings
- Right axis deviation of +110 degrees or more
- Dominant R wave in V1 (> 7 mm tall or R/S ratio > 1)
- Dominant S wave in V5 or V6 (> 7 mm deep or R/S ratio < 1)
- QRS duration < 120 ms (changes not attributable to RBBB)
- Supporting features: right ventricular strain (ST depression / T wave inversion in V1-4 and inferior leads II, III, aVF), P pulmonale, and an S1-S2-S3 pattern
Pearls
- A dominant R in V1 has a short, high-stakes differential; pairing it with right axis deviation and a right precordial strain pattern is what points specifically at RVH rather than the other causes of tall R in V1.
- Read the supporting cast: P pulmonale (P wave in II > 2.5 mm) signals the right atrial enlargement that so often travels with a pressure-overloaded right ventricle.
- The causes are the clinical story β pulmonary hypertension, mitral stenosis, PE, chronic lung disease (cor pulmonale), congenital disease like Tetralogy of Fallot, and ARVC β so let the ECG send you looking for the right-heart process behind it.
Pitfalls
- Standard RVH voltage criteria do not apply in the presence of RBBB β there are no universally accepted criteria in that setting, so don't force the diagnosis on a wide QRS.
- The right precordial strain pattern (ST depression, T inversion in V1-4) can be misread as anterior ischemia rather than RV strain.
- Requiring QRS < 120 ms matters: attributing the tall R in V1 to hypertrophy when it is really a bundle branch block leads to the wrong conclusion.
At the Bedside
Read RVH as a signal to hunt for and manage the underlying right-heart process β pursue evaluation for pulmonary hypertension, PE, valvular or chronic lung disease rather than treating the tracing itself. In the right context (acute dyspnea) new RV strain should raise your suspicion for pulmonary embolism.
LITFL ECG Library β Right Ventricular Hypertrophy (RVH) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Right Atrial Enlargement A tall, peaked P wave β P pulmonale β is the ECG footprint of a pressure-loaded right atrium, most often from pulmonary hypertension.
A 58-year-old woman with longstanding COPD presents with worsening dyspnea and leg swelling. Her ECG shows sinus rhythm, and the P waves catch your eye: in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) they are tall and sharply peaked, taller than 2.5 mm, rather than the usual gentle dome. In V1 and V2 the P wave is also prominent, exceeding 1.5 mm. The QRS and ST segments look unremarkable, but the atrial signal alone is telling you the right heart is under strain as you consider what is driving her presentation.
Key ECG findings
- Peaked P wave (P pulmonale) > 2.5 mm in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF)
- P wave amplitude > 1.5 mm in V1 and V2
- Normal P-wave duration β the enlargement shows as height, not width
- Otherwise the QRS is often unremarkable, so the diagnosis lives in the P wave
Pearls
- P pulmonale is a window onto right-heart pressure loading, so finding it should send you looking for pulmonary hypertension and its causes rather than treating it as an isolated curiosity.
- The principal driver is pulmonary hypertension from chronic lung disease (cor pulmonale), tricuspid stenosis, congenital lesions like pulmonary stenosis and Tetralogy of Fallot, or primary pulmonary hypertension.
- RAE is defined by P-wave height, not duration β a tall, narrow, pointed P is the pattern, distinct from the broad, notched P of left atrial enlargement.
Pitfalls
- The finding is easy to overlook because the QRS may be normal; scan the P waves deliberately in II and V1.
- Do not conflate the peaked P of RAE with the wide, bifid P of left atrial enlargement β they point to opposite chambers.
- P pulmonale is a clue, not a diagnosis in itself; failing to pursue the underlying pulmonary or right-heart disease is the real miss.
At the Bedside
Treat P pulmonale as a prompt to evaluate the right heart and lungs: pursue the cause of pulmonary hypertension with echocardiography and directed workup, and manage the underlying chronic lung or congenital disease driving it.
LITFL ECG Library β Right Atrial Enlargement · reviewed 2026-07-06
Pediatric & Congenital (1)
Pediatric ECG Interpretation A child's ECG must be read against age-specific norms β what looks abnormal by adult rules can be normal, and true pathology hides behind that.
A toddler is brought in by worried parents after a brief unexplained spell. The child is now playful and well-perfused, with vitals that look reasonable for age. A 12-lead is obtained with pediatric lead placement, and the tracing looks nothing like an adult's: the proportions, the axis, and the wave amplitudes are all shifted from what you are used to reading at 3 a.m. on grown patients. Reflexively applying adult thresholds, one of the residents flags several 'abnormalities.' You pause before deciding whether the tracing is normal for this child's age or whether it is pointing at something real underneath.
Key ECG findings
- The normal pediatric ECG differs from the adult ECG and must be assessed against age-specific normal values
- Correct pediatric lead placement is a prerequisite for accurate interpretation
- A stepwise assessment of the pediatric ECG (rate, rhythm, axis, intervals, morphology) is used rather than pattern-matching to adult norms
- Pediatric arrhythmias have their own common patterns distinct from adults
- Non-arrhythmic abnormalities to look for include pericarditis, myocarditis, and electrolyte disturbances
Pearls
- Interpret every pediatric tracing against age-specific norms; findings that would be abnormal in an adult can be entirely normal in a child, so adult thresholds mislead.
- Work through the ECG stepwise rather than eyeballing it as a small adult tracing β a structured read is how age-appropriate variants are separated from disease.
- Confirm pediatric lead placement before you trust any morphology or axis call; misplacement in small chests corrupts the interpretation.
Pitfalls
- Applying adult criteria to a child's ECG generates false abnormalities and can also mask real ones.
- Pericarditis (usually viral) and myocarditis (viral or rheumatic) are named causes of abnormal pediatric ECGs and are easy to under-weight in a child who looks well.
- Electrolyte disturbances β hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia β can drive the ECG changes and must be considered rather than attributed to a benign pediatric variant.
At the Bedside
Before acting on a pediatric ECG, verify pediatric lead placement, read it stepwise against age-specific norms, and if it is genuinely abnormal, work the differential the source names β arrhythmia, pericarditis or myocarditis, and electrolyte disturbance.
LITFL ECG Library β Paediatric Interpretation · reviewed 2026-07-06
Pacing & Devices (2)
Pacemaker Malfunction A paced patient with syncope, a runaway tachycardia, or unexpected bradycardia may be showing failure to capture, oversensing, or a pacemaker-mediated tachycardia hiding in plain sight.
A 78-year-old with a dual-chamber pacemaker arrives feeling faint and short of breath. Heart rate is 38 and blood pressure is soft. The monitor shows a P wave before each QRS, and tiny pacing spikes march out ahead of the ventricular complexes, most visible in V3 through V6 and again in I, aVR and V1. But the spikes are not followed by a QRS β the ventricle does not respond. The native P waves themselves fail to reach the ventricles, and between the dropped paced beats there is a long, silent pause before an escape complex crawls through. The spike is there; the depolarization is not.
Key ECG findings
- Failure to capture: a pacing spike is present but is NOT followed by myocardial depolarization (no QRS after the spike)
- Undersensing: pacing spikes appear within or on top of native QRS complexes because the device fails to sense intrinsic activity and paces asynchronously
- Output failure: an expected pacing spike is entirely absent, from oversensing, wire fracture, lead displacement, or interference
- Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia: a paced ventricular tachycardia driven by retrograde P waves sensed as native atrial activity, rate capped by the programmed upper limit (usually 160-180 bpm)
- Runaway pacemaker: paroxysms of low-amplitude, high-rate pacing spikes that may fail to capture, seen with a depleted battery
Pearls
- If the patient's native rate is above the pacemaker's set rate, no pacing is expected β so failure to capture and output failure simply cannot be diagnosed on that ECG. Absence of spikes is not proof of malfunction.
- A change in paced QRS morphology from LBBB (RV lead) to RBBB (LV lead) suggests the lead has eroded through the interventricular septum; a chest x-ray helps confirm lead position.
- Oversensing of pectoral or rectus muscle activity can inhibit output β ask the patient to isometrically contract those muscles while you watch the monitor to unmask it.
Pitfalls
- Failure to capture has causes you can fix at the bedside β electrolyte disturbance (especially hyperkalemia), acute MI, and exit block β not just hardware failure. Check a potassium and a 12-lead before assuming a dead lead.
- A rapid paced rhythm with no preceding atrial activity is not automatically malfunction: it may be pacemaker-mediated tachycardia, sensor-induced tachycardia, or an entirely appropriate response to exercise. Don't reflexively call it a device failure.
- Diagnosing malfunction on the surface ECG is genuinely difficult and often impossible; the definitive answer is device interrogation, not your read of the strip.
At the Bedside
Place a magnet to force asynchronous pacing (VOO) β this can terminate a pacemaker-mediated or sensor-induced tachycardia and can be life-saving in runaway pacemaker while definitive replacement is arranged. For a symptomatic PMT you can also slow AV nodal conduction with adenosine. Correct reversible causes of failure to capture (potassium, ischemia), and get urgent cardiology for interrogation and reprogramming; have transcutaneous pacing ready if the patient is bradycardic and unstable.
LITFL ECG Library β Pacemaker Malfunction · reviewed 2026-07-06
Normal Pacemaker Function Vertical pacing spikes before P waves or QRS complexes, each followed by a captured beat with appropriate discordance, define a normally functioning pacemaker.
An 82-year-old man with a dual-chamber device comes in for a fall. Vitals are stable. On his 12-lead you see, before each beat, a pair of sharp vertical spikes of very short duration β one preceding a small P wave, a second preceding the QRS. Each atrial spike is followed by a P wave and each ventricular spike by a broad QRS, beat after beat. The QRS complexes are wide with a left bundle branch look, and the ST segments and T waves point in the opposite direction to the main QRS deflection. A couple of complexes in the middle of the strip are narrower and shaped differently, without the same relationship to the spikes. The rhythm is regular and the rate is adequate.
Key ECG findings
- Pacing spikes β vertical deflections of short duration (~2 ms); smaller with bipolar and epicardial leads than with unipolar/endocardial leads
- Atrial pacing: spike precedes the P wave; ventricular pacing: spike precedes the QRS
- RV-paced QRS shows an LBBB morphology (left epicardial lead placement produces an RBBB morphology)
- Appropriate discordance β ST segments and T waves opposite the terminal QRS
- AV-sequential (dual-chamber) pacing: both atrial and ventricular spikes with 100% capture, a P after each atrial spike and a QRS after each ventricular spike
Pearls
- The absence of paced complexes does not mean pacemaker failure β it often just means the patient's own conduction is adequate and the device is appropriately inhibited.
- Fusion and capture beats (narrower complexes with different morphology interspersed among paced beats) are normal findings when native impulses coincide with or outrun pacing, not malfunction.
- A magnet forces asynchronous pacing (AOO/VOO/DOO) in a pacemaker, but on an ICD a magnet instead deactivates the defibrillator β do not confuse the two responses.
Pitfalls
- RV-paced LBBB-morphology beats look like native LBBB; the pacing spikes are what identify them β and the same discordance rules (Sgarbossa) apply when hunting for ischemia.
- Atrially paced patients often show 1st-degree AV block or Wenckebach that isn't present at their native rate β this reflects AV-node fatigue from pacing above its capacity, not a new pathologic block, provided output isn't compromised.
- Asynchronous ventricular pacing (e.g., magnet mode) carries a risk of pacemaker-induced ventricular tachycardia β don't apply a magnet reflexively without understanding the device.
At the Bedside
Confirm capture and appropriate inhibition before calling a device problem: verify each spike is followed by a P wave or QRS, recognize fusion/capture beats and appropriate discordance as normal, and reserve interrogation and electrophysiology involvement for genuine failure to capture, sense, or pace.
LITFL ECG Library β Pacemaker Rhythms (Normal Patterns) · reviewed 2026-07-06
Other Patterns (19)
Pericardial Effusion / Tamponade / Electrical Alternans Low voltage plus electrical alternans in a hypotensive patient is tamponade until bedside echo proves otherwise.
A 48-year-old cancer patient presents with dyspnea, tachycardia, and hypotension. The ECG shows low-voltage QRS complexes and beat-to-beat alternation in QRS amplitude and axis. The chest x-ray shows an enlarged cardiac silhouette, and a bedside echo is performed.
Key ECG findings
- Low QRS voltage, especially when effusion is large
- Electrical alternans: beat-to-beat variation in QRS amplitude or axis from a swinging heart
- Sinus tachycardia is common in tamponade physiology
- PR segment changes may coexist if inflammatory pericarditis is present
- ECG findings are supportive; echocardiography confirms effusion and tamponade physiology
Pearls
- Electrical alternans is specific but not sensitive. Do not wait for it if the patient looks like tamponade.
- Bedside echo is the action step. The ECG should make you pick up the probe.
- Malignancy, renal failure, trauma/procedure, infection, and anticoagulation history raise the pretest probability.
Pitfalls
- Do not confuse low voltage from COPD/obesity with tamponade without clinical context.
- Do not let a normal-ish ECG rule out tamponade.
- Do not delay drainage consultation in crashing obstructive shock while chasing less likely diagnoses.
At the Bedside
Put the patient on monitor, obtain immediate bedside echo, support preload/perfusion, avoid unnecessary positive-pressure ventilation if possible, and activate pericardiocentesis/surgical drainage pathway for tamponade physiology.
LITFL ECG Library β Electrical Alternans / Pericardial Effusion · reviewed 2026-06-12
Pericarditis Diffuse concave ST elevation with PR depression is pericarditis, but the ED job is to separate it from STEMI and myocarditis.
A 31-year-old man presents with sharp pleuritic chest pain that improves when leaning forward. The ECG shows diffuse concave ST elevation in I, II, aVL, aVF, and V2 through V6 with PR depression in multiple leads and reciprocal PR elevation in aVR. There is no focal reciprocal ST depression except in aVR and V1.
Key ECG findings
- Diffuse concave ST elevation across many leads
- PR depression in multiple leads with reciprocal PR elevation in aVR
- ST depression typically limited to aVR and sometimes V1
- Spodick sign: downsloping TP segment may be present
- Serial evolution can include normalization then T-wave inversion after ST segments improve
Pearls
- PR depression is the high-yield clue that points toward pericardial inflammation.
- Pericarditis should be a clinical diagnosis supported by ECG, not an ECG-only label.
- Myopericarditis can have troponin elevation; the disposition changes when myocardium is involved.
Pitfalls
- Do not call focal territorial ST elevation pericarditis just because the patient is young.
- Do not ignore reciprocal ST depression outside aVR/V1; that should pull you back toward STEMI.
- Do not miss tamponade red flags: hypotension, JVD, dyspnea, muffled heart sounds, large effusion, or pulsus paradoxus.
At the Bedside
Evaluate for STEMI mimics and high-risk pericarditis features, check troponin/inflammatory markers as appropriate, obtain echo if concern for effusion/myocarditis, and treat/dispose per risk profile.
LITFL ECG Library β Pericarditis · reviewed 2026-05-11
Benign Early Repolarization Widespread concave ST elevation with J-point notching in a young, well patient is usually benign β but the same read in anyone over 50 should not be called BER.
A 24-year-old man is sent in from a walk-in clinic after an ECG done for palpitations showed 'ST elevation.' He feels well, has no chest pain, and his vitals are normal. On the tracing there is widespread concave ST elevation, most prominent across the mid-to-left precordial leads V2-5, with smaller elevation in the inferior limb leads. Look closely at V4 and there is a notch at the J point β a small hook where the QRS meets the ST segment. The T waves are tall, peaked and slightly asymmetrical, concordant with the QRS. In V6 the ST elevation is dwarfed by the T wave. There is no reciprocal ST depression anywhere.
Key ECG findings
- Widespread concave ST elevation, most prominent in the mid-to-left precordial leads (V2-5)
- Notching or slurring at the J point β the 'fish hook' pattern, best seen in V4
- Prominent, slightly asymmetrical T waves concordant with the QRS
- ST elevation to T wave height ratio in V6 < 0.25
- No reciprocal ST depression to suggest occlusion MI
Pearls
- The ST/T ratio in V6 does real work at the bedside: < 0.25 favors BER, > 0.25 favors pericarditis, since pericarditis raises the ST segment relative to a normal-amplitude T wave.
- BER is dynamic with autonomic tone β the ST elevation and J-point notching become more prominent at slower heart rates and fade with tachycardia or exercise, which can be reassuring on a repeat tracing.
- Up to 10-15% of ED chest-pain patients have BER, so this is a pattern you will meet constantly; the skill is separating it from the occlusion it mimics.
Pitfalls
- Do not diagnose BER in patients over 50, especially with ischemic risk factors β ST elevation in that group is far more likely to be ischemia.
- BER mimics both pericarditis and acute MI; the distinguishing features (ST/T ratio, fish hook, PR depression) have limited specificity and can coexist.
- The label 'benign' is not absolute: global early repolarization patterns have been linked to idiopathic VF and, in inferior leads, to increased cardiac death in long-term follow-up.
At the Bedside
In a young, well patient whose morphology fits BER with no reciprocal change, you can avoid an unnecessary cath activation β but confirm with an old ECG and, when in doubt or the patient is older, treat the ST elevation as ischemia until serial ECGs and troponins prove otherwise.
LITFL ECG Library β Benign Early Repolarisation · reviewed 2026-07-06
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A young patient with exertional symptoms, high precordial voltages, and deep narrow 'dagger' Q waves has HCM until proven otherwise β not an old infarct.
A 30-year-old man presents after several episodes of exertional lightheadedness and palpitations. He is well-appearing now, with normal vitals. His 12-lead meets voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy across the precordial and limb leads, with nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave changes riding along. In the lateral leads I, aVL, and V5-6 there are deep but strikingly narrow Q waves, each under 40 milliseconds wide, with a couple echoed inferiorly. The computer, and even the reviewing team, are drawn to the words 'lateral infarct, age undetermined.' The R waves are tall, the young man looks fit, and he is asking to go home.
Key ECG findings
- Left ventricular hypertrophy with increased precordial voltages plus nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities
- Deep, narrow ('dagger-like') Q waves in the lateral leads (I, aVL, V5-6), sometimes inferiorly (II, III, aVF) β septal Q waves are less than 40 ms, and lateral Q waves are more common than inferior
- Possible left atrial enlargement ('P mitrale') from diastolic dysfunction
- WPW features (short PR, delta wave) in a subset β seen in 33% of HCM patients in one study
- Giant precordial T-wave inversions in the apical variant
Pearls
- The Q-wave morphology separates HCM from prior infarction: infarct Q waves are typically over 40 ms, while the septal Q waves of HCM are narrow (under 40 ms). Width, not just depth, is the clue.
- HCM is the number one cause of sudden cardiac death in young people, so exertional syncope or pre-syncope is the most worrying symptom β it flags dynamic LVOT obstruction and arrhythmic risk.
- A small subset have an abnormal ECG with a normal echo; if syncope, chest pain, and characteristic ECG changes are present but the echo is unremarkable, refer for cardiac MRI rather than reassure.
Pitfalls
- The classic trap is reading it as 'lateral infarct, age undetermined' and discharging the patient β the source cites a 30-year-old misread this way who died of a VF arrest while running for a bus.
- Giant precordial T-wave inversions may be dismissed as ischemia when they actually mark apical HCM.
- Most HCM (about 75%) has no LVOT obstruction, so a quiet murmur or absent outflow gradient does not rule out the disease or its arrhythmic danger.
At the Bedside
In a young patient with exertional symptoms and this ECG, think HCM: do not label it an old infarct or clear them home. Admit or refer for echocardiography, cardiology evaluation, and cardiac MRI if the echo is unremarkable, given the sudden-death risk.
LITFL ECG Library β Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Towering left-sided voltages with a lateral strain pattern is LVH β but voltage alone doesn't make the diagnosis.
A 68-year-old man with long-standing hypertension and a harsh systolic murmur presents with exertional breathlessness. He is stable. The ECG shows enormous QRS voltages: the S wave in V2 and the R wave in V5 together far exceed 35 mm, and adjacent precordial complexes overlap each other. R-wave peak time in V5β6 is prolonged with some QRS broadening. In the lateral leads β I, aVL, V5β6 β there is downsloping ST depression with T-wave inversion, while V1β3 show ST elevation proportional to the deep S waves. The axis is leftward and prominent U waves appear in the right precordial leads.
Key ECG findings
- Sokolow-Lyon voltage: S wave in V1 plus tallest R in V5 or V6 > 35 mm (multiple other voltage criteria across limb and precordial leads)
- Non-voltage criteria required for diagnosis: R-wave peak time > 50 ms in V5β6, plus ST depression and T-wave inversion in the left-sided leads (LV 'strain' pattern)
- Increased R amplitude in left-sided leads (I, aVL, V4β6) with deep S waves in right-sided leads (III, aVR, V1β3)
- Discordant ST elevation in V1β3 proportional to the deep S waves
- Supporting features: left atrial enlargement, left axis deviation, and prominent U waves proportional to QRS amplitude
Pearls
- Voltage criteria alone are not diagnostic β pair them with a non-voltage criterion (prolonged R-wave peak time or the strain pattern) before you call LVH.
- Severe LVH can look almost identical to LBBB; the clue that it is hypertrophy rather than a bundle block is the excessively high voltages.
- The ST elevation in V1β3 is 'appropriate discordance' in proportion to the deep S waves β don't misread it as anterior injury.
Pitfalls
- The ECG is insensitive: a patient with echocardiographically significant LVH may have a near-normal tracing, so a normal ECG does not exclude it.
- The lateral strain pattern (ST depression, T inversion) mimics ischemia β reading it as primary ischemia is the classic trap.
- Discordant V1β3 ST elevation can be mistaken for STEMI when it is simply proportional to the deep S waves.
At the Bedside
Use LVH as context, not a diagnosis of the acute complaint: it recalibrates how you read ST/T changes (expect strain and proportional discordance) so you neither over-call STEMI nor miss superimposed ischemia. Correlate with the clinical picture β hypertension, aortic stenosis, HCM β and pursue echocardiography for confirmation.
LITFL ECG Library β Left Ventricular Hypertrophy · reviewed 2026-07-06
Limb Lead Reversal A completely inverted single limb lead or a flat-line lead is usually swapped electrodes, not pathology β check the cables before you chase a diagnosis.
A 71-year-old woman is placed on the monitor for palpitations and the printed 12-lead looks alarming. Lead I is completely inverted β P wave, QRS, and T wave all pointing down β aVR has become upright, and there is marked right axis deviation. At a glance it suggests dextrocardia or a strange ectopic rhythm. But the precordial leads march out with entirely normal R wave progression across V1 to V6. On a second tracing from a different day, instead lead II records as a perfectly flat line at zero, while aVR and aVF look identical to each other. The patient is comfortable and asymptomatic, and the nurse is reaching to re-check the cables.
Key ECG findings
- LA/RA reversal: lead I completely inverted (P, QRS, T), leads II and III switch, aVL and aVR switch, aVF unchanged; aVR often becomes positive with marked right axis deviation
- LA/LL reversal: lead III completely inverted, I and II switch, aVL and aVF switch, aVR unchanged; the P wave is unexpectedly larger in I than II
- RA/LL reversal: leads I, II, III and aVF all completely inverted with an upright aVR
- A limb lead recording as a flat line (zero potential) signals a neutral-electrode swap β lead II flat in RA/RL(N) reversal, lead III flat in LA/RL(N) reversal, lead I flat in bilateral arm-leg reversal
- Neutral-electrode swaps also make a pair of augmented leads become mathematically identical (e.g. aVR and aVF appear exactly alike)
Pearls
- Preserved, normal R wave progression across the precordial leads is the tell that separates LA/RA reversal from true dextrocardia, which the inverted lead I would otherwise mimic.
- A dead-flat limb lead is a giveaway for neutral (RL/N) electrode involvement β normal cardiac signals never produce a true zero-potential lead.
- Learn the rotation shorthand: clockwise RAβLAβLLβRA versus anti-clockwise RAβLLβLAβRA lets you predict which leads invert or swap without re-deriving Einthoven's triangle.
Pitfalls
- Reversal can convincingly simulate real pathology β ectopic atrial rhythm, chamber enlargement, or myocardial ischemia and infarction β and trigger unnecessary workup.
- LA/RA reversal is easily misread as dextrocardia if you don't check precordial R wave progression.
- LL/RL(N) reversal produces no change at all because the two leg signals are virtually identical β so a normal-looking tracing never rules a swap in or out; only the characteristic patterns do.
At the Bedside
Before acting on an alarming limb-lead pattern, verify electrode placement and repeat the ECG with corrected leads. Confirming a reversal spares the patient a false diagnosis of ischemia, chamber enlargement, or arrhythmia and the interventions that would follow.
LITFL ECG Library β ECG Limb Lead Reversal · reviewed 2026-07-06
Low QRS Voltage Small complexes plus a tachycardia plus beat-to-beat swing in QRS size is a pericardial effusion until you've put the probe on the chest.
A 58-year-old woman presents with progressive dyspnea and chest heaviness. She is tachycardic at 118, blood pressure 96/68, and looks uncomfortable sitting forward. The 12-lead is unremarkable at first glance, but every QRS complex is tiny β under 5 mm in all the limb leads and under 10 mm across the precordium. Then you notice the R wave height marches up and down from beat to beat, a regular alternation in complex amplitude against a steady rhythm. The rate is fast, the voltages are small, and the complexes are swinging. Her neck veins are full and the heart sounds are muffled.
Key ECG findings
- QRS amplitude <5 mm in all limb leads, or <10 mm in all precordial leads
- Electrical alternans β beat-to-beat variation in QRS amplitude
- Tachycardia
- The triad of low voltage, tachycardia, and electrical alternans suggests massive pericardial effusion
- May accompany diffuse loss of R wave height when there is extensive prior myocardial loss
Pearls
- The low-voltage/tachycardia/electrical-alternans triad is the ECG's warning of a large pericardial effusion β its presence should drive you to the ultrasound machine, not the next lead.
- Sort the causes by what sits between the heart and the electrode: fluid (pericardial or pleural effusion), fat (obesity), or air (emphysema, pneumothorax) all damp the signal.
- Low voltage can also mean lost myocardium β a previous massive MI or end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy β or an infiltrated heart (amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis) or myxedema.
Pitfalls
- Seeing the triad and not immediately assessing for tamponade β these patients need clinical or echocardiographic evaluation without delay.
- Reading low limb-lead voltages as 'normal for body habitus' when they are the clockwise-rotated, air-damped signature of emphysema, missing the underlying lung disease.
- Overlooking that diffuse low precordial voltage can signal extensive prior anterior infarction β and that a superimposed biphasic anterior T wave may flag new critical LAD occlusion.
At the Bedside
When the triad is present, get an immediate bedside echo and assess for tamponade physiology; a tamponading effusion needs urgent pericardiocentesis. Otherwise, use the low voltage as a prompt to hunt its cause β effusion, obesity, emphysema, infiltrative disease, or lost myocardium.
LITFL ECG Library β Low QRS Voltage · reviewed 2026-07-06
Myocarditis Sinus tachycardia with nonspecific ST-T changes in a young patient after a viral illness is myocarditis until the ECG or troponin forces you to take it seriously.
A 24-year-old presents with pleuritic chest pain and dyspnea a week after a flu-like illness. Heart rate is 118, and he looks more unwell than a simple viral syndrome should make him. The ECG shows a sinus tachycardia with nonspecific ST segment and T wave changes that don't fit a single coronary territory. In another young patient with the same story, the tracing instead shows widespread concave ST elevation across multiple leads β the pattern of pericardial inflammation. Elsewhere the QRS looks slightly prolonged and the QT stretched, and there are scattered T wave inversions. The rhythm strip catches a run of ventricular ectopy. Nothing on the tracing is diagnostic on its own.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus tachycardia β the most common abnormality
- Nonspecific ST segment and T wave changes
- Widespread concave ST elevation when the adjacent pericardium is inflamed (myopericarditis)
- Prolonged QRS and QT prolongation
- Diffuse T wave inversion, ventricular arrhythmias, and AV conduction defects
Pearls
- The ECG in myocarditis is deliberately nondiagnostic β sinus tachycardia plus nonspecific ST-T change is the rule, so the diagnosis is clinical and the tracing mainly flags risk (conduction disease, arrhythmia).
- When concave, widespread ST elevation appears, the pericardium is involved too β myopericarditis β which links the picture to the pericarditis pattern rather than a coronary territory.
- Though usually a benign disease long-term, in the acute phase it can produce arrhythmias, cardiac failure, cardiogenic shock, and death, so a quiet-looking ECG doesn't equal a safe patient.
Pitfalls
- The nonspecific or diffusely elevated ST changes can mimic ACS; the tracing alone cannot exclude ischemia.
- Under-triaging a young patient because the ECG is 'only sinus tach with nonspecific changes' misses the acute arrhythmic and pump-failure risk.
- New QRS prolongation or AV block signals conduction-system involvement that can progress β do not dismiss it as incidental.
At the Bedside
Treat these ECG changes in the right clinical context (recent viral illness, chest pain, troponin rise) as possible myocarditis: monitor for arrhythmias and conduction block, check cardiac enzymes, and admit for observation given the risk of acute heart failure and shock. Consider ACS in parallel since neither the ST changes nor the presentation reliably distinguish them.
LITFL ECG Library β Myocarditis · reviewed 2026-07-06
Raised Intracranial Pressure (Cerebral T Waves) Widespread giant T-wave inversions with a very long QT in a comatose patient point to the brain, not the heart.
A comatose 55-year-old woman is wheeled in after a sudden collapse preceded by the worst headache of her life. She is unresponsive with a sluggish pupil, and the monitor shows a slow heart rate. The 12-lead is dramatic: deep, giant, symmetric T-wave inversions sprawling across nearly every lead, with a grossly prolonged QT interval measuring around 600 ms. The T-wave morphology looks unsettlingly like an anterior ischemic pattern, but the patient has no chest pain β she has no history you can obtain at all. There is a whisper of ST depression in a couple of leads. The bradycardia is new and deepening.
Key ECG findings
- Widespread giant T-wave inversions ('cerebral T waves') across multiple leads
- Marked QT prolongation (up to ~600 ms; often greater than half the R-R interval)
- Bradycardia as part of the Cushing reflex, indicating imminent brainstem herniation
- Possible ST elevation or depression mimicking ischemia or pericarditis, plus increased U-wave amplitude
Pearls
- Cerebral T waves are common with catastrophic bleeds β one series found this cerebral-T-wave-plus-long-QT pattern in 72% of SAH and 57% of intraparenchymal hemorrhage patients.
- The clinical picture separates it from ischemia: coma or a devastating headache versus chest pain, even when the T-wave morphology looks nearly identical.
- The changes can reflect neurogenic stunned myocardium with real regional wall-motion abnormalities on echo β and they normalize as the intracranial pressure is controlled.
Pitfalls
- Reflexively activating the cath lab for the 'anterior ischemia' pattern and delaying the head CT that the patient actually needs.
- Reading the bradycardia as benign β in this context it is a herniation warning (Cushing reflex), not a stable vagal slowdown.
- The long QT is a real proarrhythmic risk; adding QT-prolonging drugs on top can precipitate torsades.
At the Bedside
Redirect from a cardiac workup to emergent neuroimaging and management of raised ICP; recognize the bradycardia as impending herniation, protect the airway, and treat the intracranial catastrophe (the ECG changes reverse as ICP is controlled).
LITFL ECG Library β Raised Intracranial Pressure · reviewed 2026-07-06
Dextrocardia Global negativity in lead I with an upright aVR and vanishing precordial R waves is dextrocardia β or a limb-lead swap, and you must tell them apart.
A 40-year-old man presents for an unrelated complaint and a routine ECG is done. The machine flags it as abnormal. Lead I is upside-down: the P wave, QRS, and T wave are all inverted β global negativity. aVR, which is normally negative, shows an upright P wave, positive QRS, and upright T wave. Across the precordium the expected growth of the R wave never happens; instead there are dominant S waves from V1 through V6. The frontal axis is markedly rightward. The patient is asymptomatic and unaware of any cardiac history.
Key ECG findings
- Right axis deviation
- Positive QRS complexes with upright P and T waves in aVR
- Lead I global negativity: inverted P wave, negative QRS, and inverted T wave
- Absent R-wave progression across the precordial leads, with dominant S waves throughout
Pearls
- The findings normalize if you place the precordial leads in a mirror-image position on the right chest and reverse the left and right arm leads β a quick confirmatory maneuver.
- Global negativity in lead I plus an upright aVR is the signature that should make you think 'either dextrocardia or arm-lead reversal' every time.
- Dextrocardia may travel with situs inversus and Kartagener syndrome, so the ECG can be your first hint of a broader anatomical picture.
Pitfalls
- Left-right arm electrode reversal mimics dextrocardia in the limb leads β but the precordial leads look normal, whereas true dextrocardia loses R-wave progression across the chest.
- Reading the chest leads is the tiebreaker: if the precordium is normal, suspect a lead swap, not dextrocardia.
- Missing dextrocardia can lead to misplaced defibrillation pads and misinterpretation of any future ischemic changes.
At the Bedside
Confirm the anatomy by repeating the ECG with right-sided precordial leads and reversed arm leads; once dextrocardia is established, document it so future tracings, lead placement, and pad positioning are interpreted correctly.
LITFL ECG Library β Dextrocardia · reviewed 2026-07-06
Dilated Cardiomyopathy There is no ECG finding unique to dilated cardiomyopathy β but the ECG is almost never normal, and QS complexes in V1-V4 can masquerade as an old infarct.
A 58-year-old man presents with weeks of worsening dyspnea, orthopnea and ankle swelling. He is tachypneic with crackles at both bases. The ECG shows tall precordial voltages meeting criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy, with a downsloping ST depression and asymmetric T-wave changes in the lateral leads. The limb leads, by contrast, look relatively small in amplitude. In V1 the P wave has a broad, deep terminal negative component, and across V1 through V4 the R waves fail to build, leaving QS complexes that look like an anterior scar. The QRS is broad, approaching a bundle branch pattern but not quite typical.
Key ECG findings
- Left ventricular hypertrophy or biventricular enlargement, often with an LV 'strain' repolarization pattern in leads with dominant R waves
- Left atrial enlargement (which may progress to atrial fibrillation) or biatrial enlargement
- Left bundle branch block from cardiac dilatation (RBBB can also occur), and left axis deviation
- Poor R-wave progression with QS complexes in V1-V4 β a 'pseudoinfarction' pattern mimicking prior MI
- Discrepancy between hypertrophy voltages in V4-6 and low-voltage limb leads from diffuse fibrosis; frequent ventricular ectopy, bigeminy, and VT/VF in severe disease
Pearls
- DCM has no pathognomonic ECG β but a normal ECG is uncommon, so a clean tracing should make you question the diagnosis rather than confirm it.
- Small Q waves in V5-V6 rule out LBBB: an interventricular conduction delay from dilatation can mimic LBBB, but true LBBB has no Q waves in V6.
- The prognosis is grim β roughly 50% two-year survival β with death from progressive cardiogenic shock or sudden ventricular dysrhythmia, so frequent ectopy and NSVT on the strip are meaningful.
Pitfalls
- QS complexes and poor R-wave progression in V1-V4 are a pseudoinfarction pattern β don't reflexively diagnose an old anterior MI on the ECG alone.
- Widespread downsloping ST depression may be appropriate discordance from LVH or digoxin effect, not fresh ischemia; correlate with the clinical picture.
- LV dominance can mask coexisting right ventricular hypertrophy β right axis deviation in the presence of LVH is a clue to biventricular enlargement that's easy to overlook.
At the Bedside
Use the ECG to raise suspicion, then confirm with echocardiography (ejection fraction < 40%, chamber dilatation) β recognition drives heart-failure therapy, telemetry for the malignant ventricular arrhythmias that cause sudden death, and referral for advanced management up to transplant evaluation in end-stage disease. Treat decompensated biventricular failure and don't be falsely reassured by a 'pseudoinfarct' pattern.
LITFL ECG Library β Dilated Cardiomyopathy · reviewed 2026-07-06
Hyperthyroidism Unexplained sinus tachycardia or new atrial fibrillation with high LV voltage but no strain should put thyrotoxicosis on your differential.
A thin, tremulous 34-year-old woman presents with palpitations, heat intolerance, and weight loss over two months. She is anxious and diaphoretic. Her heart rate is 132. The 12-lead shows an irregularly irregular rhythm with no discernible P waves and a rapid ventricular response. The QRS voltages are tall enough to meet criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy, yet there is no accompanying ST depression or T-wave inversion of a strain pattern. Scattered through the tracing are nonspecific ST and T-wave changes and an occasional early wide beat. You note her staring gaze and the fine tremor of her outstretched hands as you order labs.
Key ECG findings
- Sinus tachycardia (around 50% of thyrotoxic patients have a resting rate >100 bpm)
- Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (seen in up to 20% of patients)
- High left-ventricular voltage meeting LVH voltage criteria without an LV strain pattern
- Other supraventricular arrhythmias β premature atrial beats, PSVT, multifocal atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter β plus nonspecific ST/T changes and ventricular extrasystoles
- In thyroid storm, atrial tachycardias at rates >200 bpm
Pearls
- Atrial tissue is especially sensitive to thyroid hormone, which is why atrial tachydysrhythmias dominate the picture β the ECG changes are driven by sympathetic activation plus direct myocardial stimulation.
- High voltage without strain is a useful discriminator: it suggests a hyperdynamic, thyroid-driven state rather than the pressure-overload LVH you'd expect to come with a strain pattern.
- Unexplained sinus tachycardia or new AF is itself a prompt to check TSH and T4 β the ECG can be the first clue that sends you to the thyroid.
Pitfalls
- Attributing new AF or sinus tachycardia purely to anxiety, pain, or volume status misses occult thyrotoxicosis β the source explicitly recommends thyroid function testing in these patients.
- Rates >200 bpm signal possible thyroid storm, a life threat that shouldn't be managed as ordinary rate control alone.
- Reading the high voltage as fixed structural LVH can anchor you away from the reversible thyroid driver, especially when the expected strain pattern is absent.
At the Bedside
Send TSH and T4 in any patient with unexplained sinus tachycardia or new AF, and control thyrotoxic atrial tachydysrhythmias with intravenous beta-blockade (titrated IV propranolol boluses or an esmolol infusion) while treating the underlying thyrotoxicosis; escalate to thyroid-storm management when rates exceed 200 bpm.
LITFL ECG Library β Hyperthyroidism · reviewed 2026-07-06
Hypothyroidism (Myxedema) The triad of bradycardia, low QRS voltage, and widespread T-wave inversion in a cold, obtunded patient is the ECG of severe myxedema.
A 79-year-old man is referred to the ICU with coma, hypothermia, and hypotension that is not responding to inotropes. He is profoundly bradycardic. The admission 12-lead confirms a heart rate around 30. The QRS complexes are strikingly small in amplitude, especially in the limb leads, and there are widespread T-wave inversions across the tracing without accompanying ST-segment shift. The QT looks long. Nothing on the ECG points to an acute coronary event, and the low voltages and diffuse T-wave changes together give the tracing a flat, blunted appearance out of keeping with a primary cardiac catastrophe.
Key ECG findings
- Bradycardia (in severe cases marked, e.g. around 30 bpm)
- Low QRS voltage, especially in the limb leads
- Widespread T-wave inversions, usually without ST deviation
- QT prolongation
- First-degree AV block and interventricular conduction delay may also be seen
Pearls
- Bradycardia, low voltage, and diffuse T-wave inversion together form the classic myxedema triad β reading them as one picture in a hypothermic, obtunded patient points you at the thyroid rather than the heart.
- The changes are driven by myxedematous gelatinous infiltration of the myocardium, reduced sympathetic activity, and the blunted inotropy and chronotropy of low thyroxine.
- The ECG can track treatment: with thyroid replacement (e.g. intravenous T3 and T4) the rate normalizes and T-wave inversions correct, though low limb-lead voltage may persist from residual myxedematous infiltration.
Pitfalls
- Widespread T-wave inversion invites an ischemic or ACS read; here it is typically without ST deviation and accompanies bradycardia and low voltage, pointing away from coronary occlusion.
- Low QRS voltage has other causes (e.g. effusion); anchoring on those and missing the thyroid in a bradycardic, hypothermic patient delays the real diagnosis.
- Hypotension refractory to inotropes should raise myxedema coma rather than prompting escalating pressors alone β the ECG is a prompt to check thyroid function.
At the Bedside
Let the triad trigger thyroid testing (TSH, T4) in the coma/hypothermia/bradycardia patient and start thyroid hormone replacement for myxedema coma; expect the rate and T-wave changes to correct with treatment rather than chasing them cardiac-first.
LITFL ECG Library β Hypothyroidism · reviewed 2026-07-06
Biatrial Enlargement When a single ECG meets criteria for both right and left atrial enlargement, both atria are enlarged β read lead II and V1 together.
A 55-year-old man with known cardiomyopathy presents with worsening exertional dyspnea. He is stable in sinus rhythm. On the 12-lead the P waves in lead II are both tall and broad β a bifid complex at least 2.5 mm in amplitude and over 120 ms wide. In V1 the P wave is distinctly biphasic, with a tall initial positive deflection nearly 3 mm high followed by a deep, wide terminal negative component exceeding 1 mm in depth and 40 ms in duration. The notched, prolonged P waves carry through to V5 and V6. The rest of the tracing reflects his underlying disease.
Key ECG findings
- Criteria for both right and left atrial enlargement met on the same ECG
- Lead II: bifid P wave with amplitude >=2.5 mm AND duration >=120 ms
- V1/V2: biphasic P wave with initial positive deflection >=1.5 mm tall AND terminal negative deflection >=1 mm deep and >=40 ms in duration
- Combination criterion: P positive deflection >=1.5 mm in V1/V2 plus notched P waves >120 ms in limb leads, V5 or V6
- Diagnosis requires LAE and RAE criteria met in lead II, V1, or a combination of leads
Pearls
- Biatrial enlargement is a composite diagnosis: it means you can point to right atrial enlargement AND left atrial enlargement features on the same tracing β tall P (RAE) plus wide/notched or deep-terminal P (LAE).
- Lead II and V1 do most of the work β the tall-and-wide bifid P in II and the big-biphasic P in V1 capture both atria at once.
- The finding is a marker of the underlying structural disease driving it, so let it prompt you toward the cause rather than treating it as an end in itself.
Pitfalls
- Calling it left atrial enlargement alone because you fixed on the wide notched P and missed the tall initial component that signals RAE (or vice versa).
- Requiring both criteria in the same single lead β the diagnosis is allowed across a combination of leads (e.g., tall positive P in V1/V2 with notched wide P in limb leads).
- Treating biatrial enlargement as a diagnosis in itself rather than a clue to structural heart disease β mitral/aortic valve disease and hypertension load the left atrium, pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale load the right.
At the Bedside
Use the finding as a pointer to underlying structural or pressure-overload disease β pursue the cause (valve disease, hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy) with echocardiography and clinical correlation rather than treating the ECG pattern itself.
LITFL ECG Library β Biatrial Enlargement · reviewed 2026-07-06
Biventricular Hypertrophy Large biphasic QRS complexes across the mid-precordium β the Katz-Wachtel phenomenon β betray hypertrophy of both ventricles when the usual criteria cancel out.
A 6-year-old with a known ventricular septal defect comes in for a febrile illness and gets a screening ECG. The tracing shows enormous QRS voltages, and across the mid-precordial leads V2-5 the complexes are large and biphasic β tall R waves stacked over deep S waves in the same leads. There are voltage criteria that would satisfy LVH, yet there are also persistent deep S waves carried out to V5-6 and peaked P waves in lead II. The forces seem to be pulling in both directions at once, and no single hypertrophy pattern fully explains what you are seeing.
Key ECG findings
- Katz-Wachtel phenomenon: large biphasic QRS complexes (tall R plus deep S) in V2-5
- Coexisting LVH criteria (e.g. S in V2 + R in V5 > 35 mm, R in aVL > 11 mm) with added RVH features
- RVH signs in the presence of LVH: right atrial enlargement, right axis deviation, deep S waves in V5-6
- LVH signs in the presence of RVH: tall R and deep S waves in V2-5, QRS amplitude > 50 mm
- Signs of LV strain (ST depression, T-wave inversion in V4-6) may accompany the voltages
Pearls
- The ECG has low sensitivity for BVH because opposing left and right ventricular forces cancel each other out, so a normal-looking tracing does not exclude it.
- The Katz-Wachtel phenomenon is the classic tell and is most commonly seen in children with congenital heart disease such as a VSD β context and age raise your suspicion.
- Look for a second chamber's signature: LVH voltages plus right atrial enlargement or right axis deviation should make you think both ventricles, not just one.
Pitfalls
- In children, right axis deviation and T-wave inversion in V1-3 are normal, so do not over-read them as pathologic RVH.
- Limb-lead reversal and other artifacts can fake the voltage and P-wave findings β verify lead placement before diagnosing BVH.
- Because the two ventricles' forces offset, relying on standard single-chamber criteria will systematically under-call biventricular disease.
At the Bedside
Recognizing BVH β especially the Katz-Wachtel pattern in a child β points toward significant structural or congenital heart disease and should prompt echocardiography and cardiology referral rather than reassurance based on 'just LVH.'
LITFL ECG Library β Biventricular Hypertrophy · reviewed 2026-07-06
J Point The J point β where the QRS meets the ST segment β is the landmark you measure everything from, and its deviation is the common language of ischemia, early repolarization, and hypothermia.
A young, healthy man has an ECG for a pre-participation physical. The tracing is otherwise unremarkable, but at the junction where each QRS ends and the ST segment begins, the baseline sits slightly above the isoelectric line. In several precordial leads there is a subtle notch or slur at that terminal-QRS-to-ST transition, lifting the takeoff of the ST segment upward. There is no chest pain, no reciprocal change, no evolution on a repeat tracing. The elevation is at the very junction point, not a discrete separate wave, and the young man feels completely well.
Key ECG findings
- The J point is the junction where the QRS complex terminates and the ST segment begins β the approximate end of depolarization and start of repolarization
- It is present on every ECG and is often situated slightly above baseline, particularly in healthy young males
- J-point elevation occurs with benign early repolarization
- J-point deviation is also seen with epicardial or endocardial ischemia/injury, pericarditis, RBBB, LBBB, RVH, LVH, and digitalis effect
- A positive deflection occurring BEFORE the J point is a J wave (Osborn wave), characteristically seen with hypothermia
Pearls
- The J point is a point in time, not a wave β it is the reference landmark from which ST elevation and depression are measured, so mislocating it distorts every downstream call.
- The letter J marks two unrelated things: the J point (present on all ECGs) versus the J wave / Osborn wave (an uncommon slow deflection before the J point, classically from hypothermia). Keep them distinct.
- J-point elevation above baseline is a normal finding in healthy young males β context, not the elevation alone, decides whether it's benign early repolarization or something pathological.
Pitfalls
- J-point elevation has a broad differential β early repolarization is benign, but injury currents from acute ischemia and pericarditis elevate it too; don't call every elevated J point 'normal variant.'
- Confusing the J wave (Osborn wave) with the J point leads to missing hypothermia, where the tell is the deflection immediately preceding the junction.
- Because the J point moves the reference line, sloppy identification of it against a slurred terminal QRS produces spurious ST-segment measurements.
At the Bedside
Nail the J point first β it anchors every ST-segment measurement you make, and getting it right determines whether you call ischemia, pericarditis, early repolarization, or hypothermia. When the J point is elevated, use the clinical context and reciprocal-change assessment to decide whether it's a benign variant or an injury current, and look specifically for an Osborn wave when hypothermia is possible.
LITFL ECG Library β J Point · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Atrial Enlargement A broad, notched P wave in lead II with a deep terminal negative deflection in V1 marks a pressure- or volume-loaded left atrium β a substrate for atrial fibrillation.
A 63-year-old woman with exertional dyspnea and a soft diastolic murmur has a 12-lead recorded. The rhythm is sinus, but the P waves draw the eye. In lead II each P wave is broad, running beyond 110 ms, and clearly bifid β two humps separated by more than 40 ms, an M-shaped 'P mitrale'. Over in V1 the P wave is biphasic, and its terminal negative portion is both wide, more than 40 ms, and deep, dipping over 1 mm below baseline. The QRS and ST segments look unremarkable. Everything abnormal here lives in the P wave.
Key ECG findings
- Broad, bifid P wave in lead II (P mitrale) with > 40 ms between the two peaks
- Total P wave duration > 110 ms in lead II
- Biphasic P wave in V1 with a terminal negative portion > 40 ms in duration
- Terminal negative portion of the V1 P wave > 1 mm deep
- Reflects pressure or volume overload of the left atrium
Pearls
- The whole diagnosis lives in the P wave β lead II for width and the bifid P mitrale, V1 for the depth and duration of the terminal negative deflection. Read both before you call it.
- LAE is often a precursor to atrial fibrillation, so finding it on a sinus tracing is a marker of arrhythmic substrate, not just an anatomical curiosity.
- The company it keeps is a clue: in isolation it classically means mitral stenosis, while alongside LVH it points to systemic hypertension, aortic stenosis, mitral incompetence, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Pitfalls
- Overlooking the finding entirely because attention goes to the QRS and ST segments β the abnormality is confined to the P wave.
- Calling a broad or notched P wave LAE without meeting the numeric thresholds (>110 ms duration, >40 ms interpeak, >40 ms/>1 mm terminal negativity in V1) risks over-reading normal variation.
- Treating LAE as an incidental blip and missing its link to underlying valvular or hypertensive disease and to future atrial fibrillation.
At the Bedside
Use LAE as a pointer to underlying disease and future arrhythmia: look for the causative process β mitral stenosis in isolation, or hypertension, aortic stenosis, mitral incompetence, or HCM when it accompanies LVH β and recognize the patient as being at risk for atrial fibrillation.
LITFL ECG Library β Left Atrial Enlargement · reviewed 2026-07-06
Left Axis Deviation A dominant R wave in lead I with dominant S waves in II, III, and aVF puts the QRS axis beyond -30 degrees β left axis deviation, and the question is always what's driving it.
A 68-year-old man presents for a routine pre-operative evaluation, asymptomatic. Vitals are unremarkable. On his 12-lead you run the quick axis check: lead I shows a clearly dominant, upright R wave, while leads II, III, and aVF each show a dominant downward S wave. Lead aVL, like lead I, is upright. Putting those together, the frontal-plane QRS axis sits more negative than -30 degrees. The QRS duration itself is normal and there are no acute ST-segment changes. You look back through the rest of the tracing for the features that would tell you which of several causes is responsible.
Key ECG findings
- QRS axis more negative than -30 degrees (definition of left axis deviation)
- Positive (dominant R wave) QRS in lead I
- Negative (dominant S wave) QRS in leads II, III, and aVF
- Lead aVL typically positive, as in the source's example
- Normal axis for reference spans -30 to +90 degrees
Pearls
- The three-lead check (positive I; negative II, III, aVF) is a fast bedside way to call LAD without a protractor β confirm lead II is net negative before committing, since that is the tipping point past -30 degrees.
- LAD is a finding, not a diagnosis: left anterior fascicular block is a classic cause, but so are LBBB, LVH, inferior MI, ventricular ectopy, paced rhythms, and WPW β read it as a prompt to identify the driver.
- Pairing the axis with the rest of the tracing sorts the benign from the meaningful β an old inferior MI, a pacemaker, or a delta wave each explains the axis and points management in a different direction.
Pitfalls
- Calling LAD in isolation and stopping there misses the underlying cause β inferior MI and WPW are on the list and each carries very different implications.
- Left axis deviation (down to -30) should not be confused with extreme/northwest axis (-90 to 180), which reflects a different set of pathologies.
- Attributing the axis reflexively to left anterior fascicular block can overlook LVH, a paced rhythm, or ventricular ectopy producing the same shift.
At the Bedside
Treat left axis deviation as a trigger to hunt for its cause on the same tracing and the clinical context β look for left anterior fascicular block, LBBB, LVH, inferior MI, ventricular ectopy, a paced rhythm, or WPW β and let the identified driver, not the axis label itself, direct disposition and further workup.
LITFL ECG Library β Left Axis Deviation · reviewed 2026-07-06
Right Axis Deviation A QRS axis beyond +90 degrees β positive in II, III and aVF but negative in I β is right axis deviation, and its differential runs from benign to lethal.
A 60-year-old man with long-standing COPD presents short of breath. Working through his 12-lead systematically, you check the axis: the QRS is upright with a dominant R wave in leads II, III and aVF, but in lead I the complex is predominantly negative, a deep S wave dragging it below the baseline. Lead aVL is negative as well. Estimating the frontal-plane vector on the hexaxial system puts the axis past +90 degrees, swung rightward. The rest of the tracing shows a tall R wave in V1. He is tachypneic and hypoxic, and you are trying to decide whether this axis is his chronic lung disease talking or something acute.
Key ECG findings
- QRS axis greater than +90 degrees (normal axis is -30 to +90)
- QRS positive (dominant R wave) in leads II, III and aVF
- QRS negative (dominant S wave) in lead I
- Lead aVL also negative in the illustrative example
Pearls
- RAD is a finding, not a diagnosis β the same axis can be a thin healthy young adult with a vertical heart or a patient with life-threatening pathology, so context decides.
- In a breathless patient the right-sided causes cluster: acute lung disease such as pulmonary embolism, chronic lung disease/COPD, and right ventricular hypertrophy all push the axis rightward.
- New RAD can be a clue to left posterior fascicular block or lateral MI β pair the axis with the clinical scenario rather than reading it in isolation.
Pitfalls
- Forgetting the toxic and metabolic causes β hyperkalemia and sodium-channel-blocker toxicity can produce RAD and demand entirely different, urgent treatment.
- Dismissing RAD as benign 'just their baseline' in a sick patient, when it may signal acute right-heart strain from PE.
- Overcalling pathology in a thin adult or child where a vertically positioned heart makes RAD a normal variant.
At the Bedside
Use RAD as a prompt to place the axis in clinical context: in the acutely dyspneic patient, work up right-heart strain (e.g. pulmonary embolism) and consider hyperkalemia or sodium-channel-blocker toxicity, which carry specific, time-critical treatments rather than reassurance.
LITFL ECG Library β Right Axis Deviation · reviewed 2026-07-06
No ECG patterns match that filter.
For educational use only. Verify ECG interpretation against the LITFL entry and your institution’s practice before clinical decision-making.