An Emergency Medicine Broadsheet
·Phoenix·
Est. MMXXVI
Blue Fish Med · Today's Topic
Perirectal Abscess
A perirectal abscess can progress to sepsis, necrotizing infection, fistula, or pelvic extension while remaining occult on surface examination. Antibiotics alone rarely cure a mature abscess; drainage and source control determine outcome.
A 42-year-old man shifts constantly on the stretcher, sweating through his jeans as he describes four days of worsening deep rectal pressure. He has a temperature of 38.6°C, a heart rate of 118, and says bowel movements now feel like “passing glass,” though the skin around the anus looks nearly normal. The pain is worse when he sits, but external inspection reveals no obvious fluctuance. The next move is still undecided.
— What’s your move? Read on.
Before you read
Who needs immediate operative drainage and broad-spectrum antibiotics?
Why can a benign external exam be falsely reassuring?
When to Think of It
Enter the diagnosis with severe anorectal pain, fever, urinary difficulty, tenesmus, pain with defecation, constipation, or deep pelvic/rectal pressure—especially when external findings are minimal. Immunosuppression, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy, and prior anorectal disease increase concern.
Sick or Not Sick
The key call is superficial and drainable at bedside versus deep-space, systemic, or complicated infection requiring imaging and surgical involvement. Toxic appearance, hypotension, immunocompromise, severe pain out of proportion, urinary retention, crepitus, rapidly progressive symptoms, or unclear anatomy should trigger escalation.
The First Fifteen Minutes
Obtain two IVs, CBC, metabolic panel, lactate, blood cultures if febrile or septic, and analgesia; resuscitate with lactated Ringer’s 1 L IV, reassessing after each bolus, because restoring preload supports perfusion. Use smaller aliquots in heart failure or renal failure.
Sepsis with hypotension or hypoperfusion → additional lactated Ringer’s 30 mL/kg IV (individualize for overload risk), because fluid restores circulating volume.
Suspected deep, systemic, or immunocompromised infection → piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g IV now, because it covers enteric gram-negatives and anaerobes; dose-adjust for renal dysfunction.
Severe beta-lactam allergy → vancomycin 20–25 mg/kg IV loading dose plus cefepime 2 g IV and metronidazole 500 mg IV; verify institutional allergy and renal-dosing protocols.
Persistent MAP <65 after fluids → norepinephrine 0.05–0.1 mcg/kg/min IV infusion, titrated, because α-adrenergic vasoconstriction restores perfusion pressure; peripheral initiation is acceptable while obtaining central access.
Pain → fentanyl 25–50 mcg IV, repeated every 5 minutes as needed with monitoring, because it provides rapid titratable analgesia without delaying surgical evaluation.
Do not force a painful bedside rectal examination; if required and tolerated, use abundant lubricant and gentle technique.
Definitive Care & Disposition
Perianal abscesses may undergo prompt incision and drainage when clearly superficial and accessible. Ischiorectal, intersphincteric, supralevator, horseshoe, recurrent, or unclear abscesses need colorectal/general surgery consultation, usually examination under anesthesia and operative drainage. CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast is useful for deep extension, but do not delay source control in a toxic patient. Antibiotics are added for cellulitis, systemic illness, immunocompromise, diabetes, deep infection, or incomplete drainage—not routinely for a small uncomplicated abscess. Admit septic, deep, recurrent, immunocompromised, or operative patients; selected healthy patients with complete superficial drainage may discharge with close follow-up.
How This One Kills
The lethal error is treating “no visible abscess” as “no abscess,” delaying drainage while a supralevator or ischiorectal infection progresses to pelvic sepsis or necrotizing fasciitis.
The Differential — What Else Looks Like This
Thrombosed external hemorrhoid — focal bluish perianal lump with maximal pain early; confusing it with a deep abscess delays drainage and misses sepsis.
Anal fissure — linear tear with sphincter spasm and pain during defecation; antibiotics or incision will not fix it.
Proctitis — tenesmus and discharge without a drainable collection; missing STI/IBD treatment prolongs disease.
Necrotizing soft-tissue infection — pain out of proportion, bullae, crepitus, or systemic toxicity; mistaking it for a routine abscess delays urgent debridement.
The Second-Day Story
In older adults, patients with diabetes, HIV, neutropenia, or recent antibiotics, fever and leukocytosis may be absent while deep pain, urinary retention, malaise, or inability to sit are prominent. A normal-appearing anus does not exclude a deep abscess. Persistent focal symptoms with pain on digital examination, elevated inflammatory markers, or unexplained sepsis should prompt CT and surgical consultation.
Back to Our Patient
Back to the 42-year-old man: fever, tachycardia, deep pressure, and pain with minimal external findings make a deep perirectal abscess more likely than a superficial lesion. He is risk-stratified as potentially complicated because of systemic signs and occult anatomy; IV access, lactate, cultures, cautious crystalloid, broad enteric/anaerobic antibiotics, and analgesia begin immediately. CT demonstrates an ischiorectal collection, and colorectal surgery performs examination under anesthesia with drainage. He is admitted for postoperative monitoring and IV antibiotics, with later follow-up for fistula formation.
Patient Presentation to Attending
How you’d present this patient on the floor — tight, pertinent positives and negatives, no rambling
“This is a 42-year-old man with four days of progressive deep rectal pain, fever, and painful defecation, now tachycardic at 118 with a temperature of 38.6°C. He reports severe pressure and inability to sit, but no diarrhea or rectal bleeding, and external inspection shows no fluctuance or necrotic skin. He is uncomfortable, with marked pain on gentle rectal examination and no peritoneal signs. I’m concerned for an occult deep perirectal or ischiorectal abscess with early sepsis rather than a simple hemorrhoid or fissure. I’m obtaining lactate, cultures, labs, and CT abdomen/pelvis with contrast while starting IV fluids, piperacillin-tazobactam, and analgesia. I recommend urgent colorectal surgery consultation for operative drainage and admission.”
Study Directive
Draw the perianal, intersphincteric, ischiorectal, and supralevator spaces from memory.
Review CT examples of deep anorectal abscesses and identify which require operative drainage.
Practice a sepsis medication calculation for a 70-kg adult, including renal-adjustment questions.
Rehearse a 30-second surgical consultation focused on anatomy, systemic illness, and source-control urgency.
Akinmoladun O, Hatch QM · Surg Clin North Am, 2024 · PMID 38677815 · cited 3×
Provides an up-to-date evidence-based framework for diagnosing and managing cryptoglandular anorectal abscesses, including drainage strategy and fistula considerations.
Maniskas SA, Jebbia MI, Nasir D, et al. · Am Surg, 2024 · PMID 38684322 · cited 1×
Suggests that appropriately selected perirectal abscesses can undergo incision and drainage in the emergency department with outcomes comparable to operating-room drainage.
More in Today's Issue
3 additional topics
2 of 4
Body Packers
Body packers carry multiple drug-filled packets that can rupture, causing abrupt lethal toxicity or bowel obstruction. The wrong intervention—especially...
A 29-year-old traveler sits rigidly on the stretcher, clutching a plastic bag and answering every question with the same rehearsed sentence. He has abdominal cramping, a dry mouth, and a pulse of 126; the radiograph shows several smooth, similarly shaped densities scattered through the abdomen. He denies swallowing anything and repeatedly asks when he can leave. The decision about how aggressively to intervene remains open.
Before You Read
What separates an asymptomatic carrier from a ruptured packet emergency?
Which imaging study best defines packet burden and complications?
When is endoscopy or surgery dangerous but unavoidable?
Why It Matters
Body packers carry multiple drug-filled packets that can rupture, causing abrupt lethal toxicity or bowel obstruction. The wrong intervention—especially unprepared manipulation, endoscopy, or delayed surgery—can convert a contained risk into an overdose catastrophe.
When to Think of It
Consider body packing after concealed travel, inconsistent history, abrupt sympathomimetic or opioid findings, abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, or multiple uniform radiopaque/air-outlined packets on imaging. Body stuffing involves fewer, hastily swallowed poorly wrapped packets and carries a higher rupture risk per packet.
Sick or Not Sick
The decisive call is stable packet carrier versus packet rupture, obstruction, perforation, or severe toxidrome. Any altered mental status, seizure, hyperthermia, severe hypertension, respiratory depression, peritonitis, shock, or progressive obstruction requires immediate resuscitation and toxicology/surgical involvement.
The First Fifteen Minutes
Place on continuous cardiac, temperature, pulse-oximetry, and capnography monitoring; obtain IV access, glucose, ECG, electrolytes, renal function, CK, and pregnancy testing when relevant.
Sympathomimetic agitation or seizure → lorazepam 2–4 mg IV, repeated every 5–10 minutes as needed, because benzodiazepines reduce catecholamine-driven agitation, seizures, and hyperthermia.
Opioid toxidrome with inadequate ventilation → naloxone 0.04 mg IV, escalating every 2 minutes to 0.4 mg, 2 mg, and higher until respirations improve; use the least effective dose to avoid abrupt withdrawal. If recurrent toxicity, begin an infusion based on the effective bolus; consult toxicology.
Severe hyperthermia → active external cooling immediately; do not use antipyretics, which do not correct toxin-driven heat production.
Hypotension → lactated Ringer’s 1 L IV, reassessing; persistent shock → norepinephrine 0.05–0.1 mcg/kg/min IV infusion, because vasoconstriction supports perfusion.
Do not induce vomiting, give activated charcoal, perform blind rectal examination, or use endoscopy in a suspected intact body packer; mechanical manipulation may rupture packets.
Whole-bowel irrigation is generally the preferred decontamination strategy for stable patients with intact packets, but start only after toxicology consultation and confirmation that there is no ileus, obstruction, perforation, or significant aspiration risk.
Definitive Care & Disposition
CT abdomen/pelvis without and with contrast, when feasible, helps identify packet number, obstruction, perforation, or rupture; plain radiographs may miss packets. Admit all confirmed body packers to a monitored setting, usually ICU if symptomatic. Surgical consultation is urgent for obstruction, perforation, peritonitis, packet rupture, or failure of progression. Endoscopic retrieval is generally avoided because of rupture risk. Continue observation until all packets have passed and the patient remains asymptomatic; confirm clearance according to local protocol.
How This One Kills
The critical failure is assuming a stable carrier is merely intoxicated—or giving naloxone, lavage, charcoal, or endoscopy without a rupture plan—while an obstructed or leaking packet produces sudden fatal toxicity.
The Atypical Presentation
A body packer may be completely asymptomatic, deny ingestion, and have normal vital signs. Conversely, opioid packet leakage may first appear as mild somnolence or hypoventilation rather than dramatic coma. Serial examinations, ventilation monitoring, targeted imaging, and a low threshold for toxicology consultation are more reliable than a single reassuring interview or film.
Back to Our Patient
Back to the 29-year-old traveler: tachycardia, dry mouth, abdominal cramping, and uniform packets raise concern for body packing with possible sympathomimetic exposure. He is initially protecting his airway without peritonitis, so he receives monitoring, IV access, ECG/labs, toxicology and surgical consultation, and CT confirmation rather than forced manipulation. As agitation and hypertension develop, IV lorazepam controls the catecholamine surge; imaging shows no obstruction or rupture, and supervised whole-bowel irrigation is initiated. He remains admitted to a monitored unit until packet clearance and sustained clinical stability.
Patient Presentation to Attending
“This is a 29-year-old traveler with abdominal cramping, tachycardia to 126, dry mucous membranes, and multiple uniform abdominal densities concerning for body packing. He denies ingestion, but his history is inconsistent; he is currently awake with no respiratory depression, peritonitis, or hyperthermia. I’m concerned for concealed sympathomimetic packets with risk of rupture, obstruction, and sudden toxicity. I’ve placed him on continuous cardiac, temperature, pulse-oximetry, and capnography monitoring and sent ECG, glucose, electrolytes, renal function, CK, and toxicology-related labs. I recommend CT abdomen/pelvis, immediate toxicology and surgical consultation, avoidance of endoscopy or activated charcoal, and benzodiazepines if agitation or seizure develops.”
Study Directive
Compare packing, stuffing, and concealment in a three-column note: packet number, wrapping, and rupture risk.
Interpret five abdominal radiographs/CTs and identify packets, obstruction, and perforation.
Memorize the escalation sequence for opioid toxicity and stimulant toxicity.
Review your institution’s whole-bowel-irrigation and toxicology consultation protocol.
Key Medications
Lorazepam: 2–4 mg IV, repeat q5–10 min for severe agitation/seizure; monitor respiratory depression.
Naloxone: 0.04 mg IV, escalate to effect; infusion dosing is variable—consult toxicology/reference.
Lactated Ringer’s: 1 L IV bolus, reassess.
Norepinephrine: 0.05–0.1 mcg/kg/min IV, titrate.
Polyethylene glycol–electrolyte solution for whole-bowel irrigation: commonly 1.5–2 L/h orally or via NG tube in adults, continued until clear effluent; protocols vary—check institutional guidance, and do not use with obstruction, ileus, perforation, or unstable airway.
Pediatric dosing is weight-based and requires a pediatric toxicology protocol.
High-Yield Pearls
Body packing is a packet-number problem; body stuffing is a packet-integrity problem.
A normal initial examination does not eliminate the need for monitored observation until clearance.
Sudden toxidrome in a known carrier means rupture until proven otherwise.
The Mimics
Body stuffing — few, poorly wrapped packets swallowed hurriedly; rupture risk is higher and observation may need to be longer.
Ileus or bowel obstruction — dilated loops without uniform packets; confusing it with packing delays surgical evaluation.
Sympathomimetic intoxication without packets — toxidrome but no packet burden; unnecessary invasive retrieval causes harm.
Pharmacobezoar — medication concretions rather than discrete packets; management depends on the drug and formulation.
Board Question
A stable patient who swallowed multiple intact cocaine packets has no obstruction, perforation, or toxidrome. Which management is most appropriate?
AImmediate endoscopic extraction
BInduced emesis
CWhole-bowel irrigation with monitored observation
DRoutine activated charcoal alone
Reveal answer
Correct: C
Whole-bowel irrigation can promote passage of intact packets while avoiding mechanical manipulation. Endoscopy and emesis may rupture packets; charcoal alone is inadequate for multiple concealed packets.
Synthesizes reported presentations, complications, diagnostic approaches, and management of packet obstruction or rupture, providing a focused reference for body packer syndrome.
Provides real-world outcome and management data for cocaine body packers, informing ED decisions about observation, decontamination, imaging, and escalation to surgery.
Rectal foreign bodies range from easily removable objects to perforating, fragile, or concealed hazards. Repeated blind attempts can push the object higher,...
A 37-year-old man arrives walking stiffly, one hand pressed against his lower abdomen, while a metallic edge is visible just inside the anal canal. He reports escalating pressure and says he has been unable to pass stool since earlier that evening. His abdomen is soft but tender low in the pelvis, and he is embarrassed enough to minimize the story. The question is whether this can be safely solved at the bedside.
Before You Read
What must be established before attempting removal?
Which objects should never be blindly manipulated?
When does a “successful” extraction still require imaging or surgical evaluation?
Why It Matters
Rectal foreign bodies range from easily removable objects to perforating, fragile, or concealed hazards. Repeated blind attempts can push the object higher, cause mucosal tears, or precipitate perforation.
When to Think of It
Suspect a rectal foreign body with pelvic/rectal pain, tenesmus, bleeding, inability to defecate, unexplained obstruction, or a witnessed insertion. Ask directly and nonjudgmentally about object type, time, material, breakage, and insertion route. Consider sexual assault, intoxication, psychiatric disease, and concealment of drug packets.
Sick or Not Sick
The key fork is stable patient without peritonitis and with a low, palpable object versus suspected perforation, obstruction, high/impacted object, or dangerous material. Peritonitis, shock, free air, severe bleeding, sharp/fragile objects, magnets, batteries, or failed bedside attempts require early surgical involvement.
The First Fifteen Minutes
NPO, IV access, CBC, metabolic panel, type and screen if bleeding, and analgesia; obtain pregnancy testing when relevant.
Pain or procedural discomfort → fentanyl 25–50 mcg IV, repeated q5 minutes as needed with monitoring, because rapid titration facilitates examination without masking deterioration.
Significant nausea → ondansetron 4 mg IV or ODT, because reducing emesis limits pressure and aspiration risk.
If peritonitis, free air, or suspected perforation → piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g IV now, because it covers enteric gram-negative and anaerobic flora; consult surgery immediately.
Avoid oral intake, laxatives, enemas, and repeated blind digital sweeps before the object’s location and integrity are known.
Perform external inspection and a gentle digital examination only if safe; document bleeding, sphincter tone, palpable location, and whether the object is sharp or breakable.
Obtain AP/lateral abdominal-pelvic radiographs for radiopaque objects or suspected perforation; CT is preferred when radiographs are nondiagnostic or complications are suspected.
Definitive Care & Disposition
A low, blunt, intact object may be removed with adequate analgesia, lubrication, direct visualization, and appropriate procedural sedation, with surgery available. High or inaccessible objects usually require removal under anesthesia, often with endoscopic or operative assistance. After extraction, inspect the object for completeness and repeat abdominal/rectal examination; perform endoscopic evaluation or CT when mucosal injury, perforation, significant bleeding, or persistent pain is present. Discharge is reasonable only after uncomplicated removal, normal examination, reliable follow-up, and no retained fragments or complications.
How This One Kills
The classic failure is repeated bedside attempts that drive a proximal object through an unrecognized rectal perforation, converting a controlled problem into feculent peritonitis.
The Atypical Presentation
Patients may deny insertion because of shame, intoxication, fear of legal consequences, or concern about judgment. Elderly or immunocompromised patients may have little pain despite perforation. Unexplained rectal bleeding, obstruction, pelvic pain, or an abnormal radiograph should prompt a private, direct history and imaging rather than reliance on disclosure.
Back to Our Patient
Back to the 37-year-old man: a low, metallic, palpable object with stable vital signs and no peritonitis places him in the potentially uncomplicated branch, but the risk of mucosal injury requires a controlled plan. He remains NPO, receives IV access, analgesia, imaging to define position and exclude free air, and early surgical awareness. Under adequate procedural sedation and direct visualization, the intact object is removed without complication; repeat examination shows only a superficial abrasion, and he is discharged after observation with explicit return precautions and follow-up.
Patient Presentation to Attending
“This is a 37-year-old man with several hours of pelvic pressure, constipation, and rectal pain after insertion of a metallic object, which is currently low and palpable on examination. He is hemodynamically stable, has a soft abdomen without guarding or rebound, and has no major bleeding or fever. I’m concerned for a retained rectal foreign body with possible mucosal injury, but there is no current evidence of perforation. He is NPO with IV access, analgesia, and pelvic-abdominal imaging underway. I recommend controlled removal under direct visualization with surgical backup, followed by repeat examination and imaging or endoscopy if pain, bleeding, or peritoneal findings persist.”
Study Directive
Build a removal algorithm from memory: stabilize, image, assess for perforation, plan controlled extraction, reassess.
Review indications for radiograph versus CT and practice identifying free air.
Rehearse a nonjudgmental three-question history about object, timing, and complications.
Practice documenting pre- and post-extraction abdominal and rectal findings.
Key Medications
Fentanyl: 25–50 mcg IV, repeat q5 min as needed; monitor ventilation.
Ondansetron: 4 mg IV/ODT, may repeat once; adjust caution in marked QT prolongation.
Procedural sedation, if needed, should follow local protocol; common options include ketamine 1 mg/kg IV or propofol 0.5–1 mg/kg IV, with airway-skilled personnel and monitoring. Dosing varies with age/comorbidity—check institutional protocol.
Piperacillin-tazobactam: 4.5 g IV, then q6–8h; renal-adjust.
Pediatric patients require weight-based sedation and antibiotic dosing.
High-Yield Pearls
Before removal, know the object’s material, location, orientation, and whether it is intact.
A second examination after extraction is not optional; retained fragments and occult perforation are common failure points.
Failed bedside attempts increase injury risk and should lower the threshold for operative removal.
The Mimics
Fecal impaction — hard stool without a discrete object or insertion history; aggressive “disimpaction” can worsen an actual foreign body injury.
Rectal prolapse — concentric mucosal folds protruding externally; manipulating it as an object worsens edema and trauma.
Perirectal abscess — fever and deep pain without a palpable object; delay in drainage risks sepsis.
Bowel obstruction — proximal distention and transition point; assuming the rectal object explains everything can miss a second pathology.
Board Question
A patient with a retained blunt rectal object has severe abdominal tenderness, guarding, and free intraperitoneal air. What is the next step?
ABlind bedside extraction
BEnema
CUrgent surgical consultation and operative management
DDischarge after oral analgesia
Reveal answer
Correct: C
Peritonitis and free air indicate perforation until proven otherwise. Manipulation through a perforation can worsen contamination and delay definitive source control.
Provides a systematic evidence summary of presentation, diagnostic evaluation, extraction strategies, and complications to guide emergency management of rectal foreign bodies.
Offers contemporary clinical experience with escalation from transanal extraction to operative management, helping residents anticipate when bedside removal may fail and surgical consultation is needed.
High or complicated rectal foreign bodies can produce perforation, hemorrhage, obstruction, ischemia, and sepsis. Fragmentation and repeated attempts make...
A 55-year-old woman is pale and nauseated, with a large glass object lodged beyond the reach of a routine examination. She has lower abdominal guarding and a small amount of bright blood on her clothing, but her blood pressure is still normal. Her partner says several removal attempts were made before arrival, and the object may have cracked. The next move must account for both the patient and what may now be inside her pelvis.
Before You Read
Which complications demand immediate operative management?
How should sharp, fragile, large, or high objects be approached?
What must be checked after an apparently successful removal?
Why It Matters
High or complicated rectal foreign bodies can produce perforation, hemorrhage, obstruction, ischemia, and sepsis. Fragmentation and repeated attempts make the injury more dangerous than the original insertion.
When to Think of It
Part 2 applies when the object is high, impacted, sharp, fragile, large, radiolucent, broken, associated with bleeding/peritonitis, or not removable after a careful attempt. Persistent pain, fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, inability to pass stool/gas, or worsening abdominal findings signal complication.
Sick or Not Sick
The single decision is uncomplicated retained object suitable for controlled specialist removal versus perforation/ischemia/hemorrhage requiring emergent operative source control. Guarding, rebound, shock, free air, active bleeding, sepsis, or suspected sharp fragments means surgery now—not repeated bedside experimentation.
The First Fifteen Minutes
NPO, two large-bore IVs, CBC, CMP, coagulation studies, lactate, type and crossmatch, and early colorectal/general surgery consultation.
Suspected perforation, sepsis, or significant mucosal injury → piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g IV now, because it provides broad enteric gram-negative and anaerobic coverage; renal-adjust.
Severe beta-lactam allergy → vancomycin 20–25 mg/kg IV loading plus cefepime 2 g IV and metronidazole 500 mg IV; verify institutional protocol.
Hemorrhagic shock → balanced crystalloid 500–1,000 mL IV, followed by blood products when indicated, because limiting crystalloid reduces dilution and supports oxygen delivery.
Ongoing hypotension after blood/fluid resuscitation → norepinephrine 0.05–0.1 mcg/kg/min IV infusion, because vasopressor support maintains perfusion while source control is arranged.
Pain → fentanyl 25–50 mcg IV, repeated q5 minutes as needed with respiratory monitoring.
Do not administer enemas, laxatives, oral intake, or perform blind extraction; avoid pulling on sharp or fragile objects.
If unstable, peritonitic, or actively bleeding, proceed toward the operating room rather than delaying for extensive imaging. If stable, CT abdomen/pelvis is the preferred study for location, fragments, free air, and abscess.
Definitive Care & Disposition
High or complicated objects should be removed in the operating room or endoscopy suite with anesthesia and surgical backup. Laparotomy or laparoscopy may be required for perforation, inaccessible objects, failed transanal removal, or severe contamination. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, source control, abdominal washout, repair, and possible diversion depend on injury. After removal, inspect the rectum and sigmoid colon—often with proctoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy—and observe for delayed perforation. Admit all patients with perforation, significant mucosal injury, systemic illness, difficult extraction, or unreliable follow-up.
How This One Kills
The dangerous mistake is declaring victory after extraction while a sharp fragment, full-thickness tear, or delayed perforation remains, allowing fecal contamination and sepsis to evolve after discharge.
The Atypical Presentation
Patients may present days later with fever, malaise, constipation, or vague abdominal pain after an object has passed or been removed elsewhere. Older adults, patients on steroids, and those with immunosuppression may lack guarding despite perforation. Persistent tachycardia, rising lactate, leukocytosis, anemia, or escalating pain should prompt CT and surgical reassessment even when the object is no longer palpable.
Back to Our Patient
Back to the 55-year-old woman: a high, possibly cracked glass object, prior failed attempts, bleeding, and guarding place her in the complicated branch with suspected perforation. She is kept NPO, receives large-bore IV access, laboratory and crossmatch testing, analgesia, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and immediate surgical/anesthesia consultation. CT shows free air and pelvic contamination, so further bedside manipulation is abandoned and she proceeds urgently to the operating room for removal, repair, and washout. She is admitted postoperatively for antibiotics, serial examinations, and monitoring for leak or sepsis.
Patient Presentation to Attending
“This is a 55-year-old woman with a high retained glass rectal foreign body, worsening lower abdominal pain, bright red bleeding, and multiple failed extraction attempts before arrival. She is pale with guarding and tenderness, although currently normotensive; the object may have fractured. I’m concerned for rectal perforation with pelvic contamination and possible hemorrhage, not an uncomplicated retained object. She is NPO with two IVs, CBC, coagulation studies, lactate, type and crossmatch, analgesia, and broad-spectrum antibiotics started. I recommend immediate colorectal surgery and anesthesia involvement, CT only if it will not delay the operating room, and no further bedside manipulation.”
Study Directive
Memorize operative triggers: peritonitis, free air, shock, active bleeding, sharp/fragmented object, high location, and failed extraction.
Review pelvic CT anatomy and distinguish extraperitoneal from intraperitoneal rectal injury.
Practice a post-extraction checklist: object intact, bleeding controlled, abdominal exam, endoscopic assessment, observation plan.
Rehearse an emergency surgical handoff in four lines: object, attempts, complication signs, resuscitation, and requested intervention.
Key Medications
Piperacillin-tazobactam: 4.5 g IV q6–8h; renal-adjust.
Vancomycin: 20–25 mg/kg IV loading, then pharmacy-guided; check reference.
Cefepime: 2 g IV q8h; renal-adjust.
Metronidazole: 500 mg IV q8h.
Fentanyl: 25–50 mcg IV, repeat q5 min as needed with monitoring.
Norepinephrine: 0.05–0.1 mcg/kg/min IV, titrate to perfusion.
Blood products: follow massive transfusion or hemorrhage protocol; dosing varies by clinical context and institutional policy.
Pediatric sedation, resuscitation, and antimicrobial dosing are weight-based and require pediatric protocols.
High-Yield Pearls
Sharp, glass, large, or high objects belong in a controlled specialist environment—not repeated bedside attempts.
The rectum may look intact while an intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal perforation is evolving.
Post-extraction tachycardia is a complication signal until proven otherwise, even when pain improves.
The Mimics
Perforated diverticulitis — left lower quadrant pain and free air may coexist but are not explained by the rectal object; wrong attribution delays source control.
Colorectal malignancy with obstruction — altered bowel habits and narrowing may mimic impaction; missing it forfeits diagnosis and treatment.
Mesenteric ischemia — pain out of proportion with metabolic acidosis; assuming rectal trauma is the sole cause delays revascularization.
Sexual assault-related injury — genital/anal trauma may be present without a retained object; failure to address safety and forensic needs causes additional harm.
Board Question
After removal of a difficult high rectal foreign body, the patient has persistent tachycardia, increasing abdominal pain, and a rising lactate despite a benign initial examination. What is the best next step?
ADischarge with stool softener
BRepeat digital examination only
CCT abdomen/pelvis and urgent surgical reassessment
DAdminister an enema
Reveal answer
Correct: C
Delayed perforation or ongoing contamination may become evident after extraction, and early signs can be subtle. CT and surgical reassessment are appropriate; enemas and discharge can worsen or delay recognition of injury.
Provides a consolidated evidence base for choosing transanal, endoscopic, or operative extraction and anticipating complications of rectal foreign bodies.
A quick test of recall from prior editions. Commit to an answer before you check.
From yesterday's edition
A 74-year-old woman on digoxin for atrial fibrillation is brought in feeling nauseated and 'off,' with some blurred vision. She is stable, and the monitor shows a regular narrow-complex rhythm at about 80. What’s the diagnosis, and the first move?
Check your answer
Accelerated Junctional Rhythm. Recognition redirects you to the cause rather than to rate control: in a digoxin-treated patient, evaluate for toxicity, and otherwise look for ischemia, myocarditis, sympathomimetics, or recent cardiac surgery, since the rhythm itself is usually a marker rather than the primary target.
From the August 3 edition
Today, three days ago: Vasopressin. What’s the adult ED dose, and the contraindication you’d most regret missing?
Check your answer
Septic shock adjunct: 0.03 units/min IV infusion, usually added to norepinephrine rather than titrated as first-line monotherapy. Hypersensitivity.
From the July 27 edition
A 66-year-old man vomits during an opioid overdose and develops hypoxemia with bilateral patchy infiltrates. Six hours later he is afebrile, hemodynamically stable, and oxygenation is improving with supportive care. What is the best management?
AImmediate clindamycin
BAmpicillin-sulbactam for 14 days
CSupportive care with close reassessment
DEmergent bronchoscopy in all cases
Reveal answer
Correct · C
Acute chemical pneumonitis after gastric aspiration is initially managed with airway support, oxygen, suction, and observation. Antibiotics are reserved for persistent or progressive findings suggesting bacterial infection; bronchoscopy is selective, especially for particulate obstruction.
Journal Watch
From the FOAMed wire
No new items in the last week. The wire resumes when sources update.
In this episode, Sam Ashoo, MD and Dr. T.R. Eckler, MD discuss the July 2026 Emergency Medicine Practice article, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Diagnosis and Management in the Emergency Department . 0:17 – Intro & sponsor promo 1:09 – Episode introduction 4:03 – Definitions: SJS vs. TEN vs. "overlap" by body surface area 6:12 –...
We kick off July with pieces on sepsis from Haney, peds fingertip injuries from Ilene, and a case of a cranky consult with Jan and Swami. Megan and Mel work through last month’s EMA papers 1. Mel's July Update 2....
Pharmacology Corner
Two drugs for the shift
One antimicrobial and one other ED workhorse — selected daily, with sources and last-reviewed dates so every dose is cross-checkable.
Antimicrobial of the Day
Clindamycin
Lincosamide antibiotic; toxin-suppressing protein synthesis inhibitor
Indication
Adjunctive toxin suppression in necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock; anaerobic and gram-positive coverage in selected dental, skin, and soft tissue infections; alternative in some beta-lactam allergy scenarios.
What’s your dose? — reveal dosing & cautions
ED Dose
600–900 mg IV q8h for severe infection. 300–450 mg PO q6–8h for outpatient SSTI/dental infections when appropriate.
Renal Adjustment
No renal dose adjustment.
Contraindications
Known clindamycin allergy; history of severe C. difficile is a major caution.
Interactions
Neuromuscular blockers may be potentiated; erythromycin antagonism possible in vitro.
Monitoring
Diarrhea/C. difficile risk, LFTs and CBC with prolonged courses, local resistance patterns for MRSA.
ED Pearl
In suspected nec fasc or streptococcal toxic shock, clindamycin is not there for coverage breadth — it is there to suppress toxin production while definitive source control happens.
For educational use only. Verify dosing against the FDA label and your institution’s pharmacy resources before administering.
ECG of the Day
Misc
J Point
The J point — where the QRS meets the ST segment — is the landmark you measure everything from, and its deviation is the common language of ischemia, early repolarization, and hypothermia.
The Tracing
A young, healthy man has an ECG for a pre-participation physical. The tracing is otherwise unremarkable, but at the junction where each QRS ends and the ST segment begins, the baseline sits slightly above the isoelectric line. In several precordial leads there is a subtle notch or slur at that terminal-QRS-to-ST transition, lifting the takeoff of the ST segment upward. There is no chest pain, no reciprocal change, no evolution on a repeat tracing. The elevation is at the very junction point, not a discrete separate wave, and the young man feels completely well.
The J point is the junction where the QRS complex terminates and the ST segment begins — the approximate end of depolarization and start of repolarization
It is present on every ECG and is often situated slightly above baseline, particularly in healthy young males
J-point elevation occurs with benign early repolarization
J-point deviation is also seen with epicardial or endocardial ischemia/injury, pericarditis, RBBB, LBBB, RVH, LVH, and digitalis effect
A positive deflection occurring BEFORE the J point is a J wave (Osborn wave), characteristically seen with hypothermia
Pearls
The J point is a point in time, not a wave — it is the reference landmark from which ST elevation and depression are measured, so mislocating it distorts every downstream call.
The letter J marks two unrelated things: the J point (present on all ECGs) versus the J wave / Osborn wave (an uncommon slow deflection before the J point, classically from hypothermia). Keep them distinct.
J-point elevation above baseline is a normal finding in healthy young males — context, not the elevation alone, decides whether it's benign early repolarization or something pathological.
Pitfalls
J-point elevation has a broad differential — early repolarization is benign, but injury currents from acute ischemia and pericarditis elevate it too; don't call every elevated J point 'normal variant.'
Confusing the J wave (Osborn wave) with the J point leads to missing hypothermia, where the tell is the deflection immediately preceding the junction.
Because the J point moves the reference line, sloppy identification of it against a slurred terminal QRS produces spurious ST-segment measurements.
At the Bedside
Nail the J point first — it anchors every ST-segment measurement you make, and getting it right determines whether you call ischemia, pericarditis, early repolarization, or hypothermia. When the J point is elevated, use the clinical context and reciprocal-change assessment to decide whether it's a benign variant or an injury current, and look specifically for an Osborn wave when hypothermia is possible.
For educational use only. Verify ECG interpretation against the LITFL entry and your institution’s practice before clinical decision-making.
Case of the Day
From the lead · Perirectal Abscess
Self-Examination
Test Your Understanding
A 48-year-old man has fever, severe rectal pain, urinary hesitancy, and no visible perianal mass. CT shows a supralevator abscess. What is the best next step?
AOral amoxicillin-clavulanate and outpatient follow-up
BBedside needle aspiration only
CBroad-spectrum IV antibiotics and urgent surgical drainage
DTopical nitroglycerin
Reveal answer
Correct answer · C
A supralevator abscess is a deep-space infection requiring systemic therapy and operative source control. Bedside treatment risks incomplete drainage and injury.
Study Pace4 topics today; Issue 23 of 94 — Gastrointestinal (Week 13)Deadline · June 1, 2026